There are some typos in the documentation: 'a' -> 'at', missing 'to'.
Fix them.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst b/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
index dae78dfa7cdc..c700dde9259c 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
@@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ checking* and *theorem proving*) with a more practical approach for complex
 systems.
 
 Instead of relying on a fine-grained model of a system (e.g., a
-re-implementation a instruction level), RV works by analyzing the trace of the
+re-implementation at instruction level), RV works by analyzing the trace of the
 system's actual execution, comparing it against a formal specification of
 the system behavior.
 
 The main advantage is that RV can give precise information on the runtime
 behavior of the monitored system, without the pitfalls of developing models
 that require a re-implementation of the entire system in a modeling language.
-Moreover, given an efficient monitoring method, it is possible execute an
+Moreover, given an efficient monitoring method, it is possible to execute an
 *online* verification of a system, enabling the *reaction* for unexpected
 events, avoiding, for example, the propagation of a failure on safety-critical
 systems.
-- 
2.47.1.404.ge66fd72e97

Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com> writes:

> There are some typos in the documentation: 'a' -> 'at', missing 'to'.
> Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

jon

On Mon,  9 Dec 2024 15:06:00 +0200
Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are some typos in the documentation: 'a' -> 'at', missing 'to'.
> Fix them.
> 

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

-- Steve

> Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst b/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
> index dae78dfa7cdc..c700dde9259c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
> @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ checking* and *theorem proving*) with a more practical approach for complex
>  systems.
>  
>  Instead of relying on a fine-grained model of a system (e.g., a
> -re-implementation a instruction level), RV works by analyzing the trace of the
> +re-implementation at instruction level), RV works by analyzing the trace of the
>  system's actual execution, comparing it against a formal specification of
>  the system behavior.
>  
>  The main advantage is that RV can give precise information on the runtime
>  behavior of the monitored system, without the pitfalls of developing models
>  that require a re-implementation of the entire system in a modeling language.
> -Moreover, given an efficient monitoring method, it is possible execute an
> +Moreover, given an efficient monitoring method, it is possible to execute an
>  *online* verification of a system, enabling the *reaction* for unexpected
>  events, avoiding, for example, the propagation of a failure on safety-critical
>  systems.