From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>

Array @dummy_imask only needs MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS elements, but it actually
has (MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS + 1) elements.

Fix by using (MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS - 1) as max element index in initializer.

Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
---
 drivers/of/irq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
index 43cf60479b9e18eb0eec35f39c147deccd8fe8dd..758eb9b3714868112e83469d131b244ce77d4e82 100644
--- a/drivers/of/irq.c
+++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ int of_irq_parse_raw(const __be32 *addr, struct of_phandle_args *out_irq)
 	struct device_node *ipar, *tnode, *old = NULL;
 	__be32 initial_match_array[MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS];
 	const __be32 *match_array = initial_match_array;
-	const __be32 *tmp, dummy_imask[] = { [0 ... MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS] = cpu_to_be32(~0) };
+	const __be32 *tmp, dummy_imask[] = { [0 ... (MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS - 1)] = cpu_to_be32(~0) };
 	u32 intsize = 1, addrsize;
 	int i, rc = -EINVAL;
 

-- 
2.34.1

On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 09:25:00PM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
> 
> Array @dummy_imask only needs MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS elements, but it actually
> has (MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS + 1) elements.
> 
> Fix by using (MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS - 1) as max element index in initializer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/irq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied, thanks.

Rob