Currently the Qualcomm CAMSS driver only supports D-PHY while the
hardware on most SoCs also supports C-PHY. Until this support is added,
check for D-PHY to make it somewhat explicit that C-PHY won't work.
Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
---
drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
index 9fb31f4c18adee886cd0bcf84438a8f27635e07f..b99af35074cdf6fa794a0d2f0d54ecf12ac354d9 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
@@ -1855,6 +1855,15 @@ static int camss_of_parse_endpoint_node(struct device *dev,
if (ret)
return ret;
+ /*
+ * Most SoCs support both D-PHY and C-PHY standards, but currently only
+ * D-PHY is supported in the driver.
+ */
+ if (vep.bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Unsupported bus type %d\n", vep.bus_type);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
csd->interface.csiphy_id = vep.base.port;
mipi_csi2 = &vep.bus.mipi_csi2;
--
2.47.1
Hi Luca.
On 12/9/24 14:01, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Currently the Qualcomm CAMSS driver only supports D-PHY while the
> hardware on most SoCs also supports C-PHY. Until this support is added,
> check for D-PHY to make it somewhat explicit that C-PHY won't work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> index 9fb31f4c18adee886cd0bcf84438a8f27635e07f..b99af35074cdf6fa794a0d2f0d54ecf12ac354d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> @@ -1855,6 +1855,15 @@ static int camss_of_parse_endpoint_node(struct device *dev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Most SoCs support both D-PHY and C-PHY standards, but currently only
> + * D-PHY is supported in the driver.
> + */
> + if (vep.bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Unsupported bus type %d\n", vep.bus_type);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> csd->interface.csiphy_id = vep.base.port;
>
> mipi_csi2 = &vep.bus.mipi_csi2;
My cautious worries were futile, the change works as expected and
the regression testing on RB5 is passed:
===== begin parsing endpoint /soc@0/camss@ac6a000/ports/port@2/endpoint
fwnode video bus type not specified (0), mbus type not specified (0)
lane 0 position 0
lane 1 position 1
lane 2 position 2
lane 3 position 3
clock lane position 7
no lane polarities defined, assuming not inverted
assuming media bus type MIPI CSI-2 D-PHY (5)
===== end parsing endpoint /soc@0/camss@ac6a000/ports/port@2/endpoint
Tested-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
On 09/12/2024 12:01, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Currently the Qualcomm CAMSS driver only supports D-PHY while the
> hardware on most SoCs also supports C-PHY. Until this support is added,
> check for D-PHY to make it somewhat explicit that C-PHY won't work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> index 9fb31f4c18adee886cd0bcf84438a8f27635e07f..b99af35074cdf6fa794a0d2f0d54ecf12ac354d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> @@ -1855,6 +1855,15 @@ static int camss_of_parse_endpoint_node(struct device *dev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Most SoCs support both D-PHY and C-PHY standards, but currently only
> + * D-PHY is supported in the driver.
> + */
> + if (vep.bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Unsupported bus type %d\n", vep.bus_type);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> csd->interface.csiphy_id = vep.base.port;
>
> mipi_csi2 = &vep.bus.mipi_csi2;
>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
On 12/9/24 14:32, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 09/12/2024 12:01, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> Currently the Qualcomm CAMSS driver only supports D-PHY while the
>> hardware on most SoCs also supports C-PHY. Until this support is added,
>> check for D-PHY to make it somewhat explicit that C-PHY won't work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
>> index 9fb31f4c18adee886cd0bcf84438a8f27635e07f..b99af35074cdf6fa794a0d2f0d54ecf12ac354d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
>> @@ -1855,6 +1855,15 @@ static int camss_of_parse_endpoint_node(struct device *dev,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Most SoCs support both D-PHY and C-PHY standards, but currently only
>> + * D-PHY is supported in the driver.
>> + */
>> + if (vep.bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Unsupported bus type %d\n", vep.bus_type);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
Looks like it would break all old board dtbs, which is not just bad, but NAK.
V4L2_MBUS_UNKNOWN shall be properly handled without the risk of regressions.
>> csd->interface.csiphy_id = vep.base.port;
>>
>> mipi_csi2 = &vep.bus.mipi_csi2;
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
>
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
On Fri Dec 13, 2024 at 12:02 PM CET, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 12/9/24 14:32, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > On 09/12/2024 12:01, Luca Weiss wrote:
> >> Currently the Qualcomm CAMSS driver only supports D-PHY while the
> >> hardware on most SoCs also supports C-PHY. Until this support is added,
> >> check for D-PHY to make it somewhat explicit that C-PHY won't work.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 9 +++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> >> index 9fb31f4c18adee886cd0bcf84438a8f27635e07f..b99af35074cdf6fa794a0d2f0d54ecf12ac354d9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
> >> @@ -1855,6 +1855,15 @@ static int camss_of_parse_endpoint_node(struct device *dev,
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * Most SoCs support both D-PHY and C-PHY standards, but currently only
> >> + * D-PHY is supported in the driver.
> >> + */
> >> + if (vep.bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "Unsupported bus type %d\n", vep.bus_type);
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> +
>
> Looks like it would break all old board dtbs, which is not just bad, but NAK.
>
> V4L2_MBUS_UNKNOWN shall be properly handled without the risk of regressions.
Please see drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c around line 218.
The code there sets bus_type if it's UNKNOWN
if (bus_type == V4L2_MBUS_UNKNOWN)
vep->bus_type = V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY;
So setting "bus-type" in dt is not necessary, even if it makes things
more explicit from dt side. I don't think we'll ever get UNKNOWN here in
camss.
Regards
Luca
>
> >> csd->interface.csiphy_id = vep.base.port;
> >>
> >> mipi_csi2 = &vep.bus.mipi_csi2;
> >>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
> >
>
> --
> Best wishes,
> Vladimir
On 12/13/24 13:22, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Fri Dec 13, 2024 at 12:02 PM CET, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> On 12/9/24 14:32, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>> On 09/12/2024 12:01, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> Currently the Qualcomm CAMSS driver only supports D-PHY while the
>>>> hardware on most SoCs also supports C-PHY. Until this support is added,
>>>> check for D-PHY to make it somewhat explicit that C-PHY won't work.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 9 +++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
>>>> index 9fb31f4c18adee886cd0bcf84438a8f27635e07f..b99af35074cdf6fa794a0d2f0d54ecf12ac354d9 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c
>>>> @@ -1855,6 +1855,15 @@ static int camss_of_parse_endpoint_node(struct device *dev,
>>>> if (ret)
>>>> return ret;
>>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Most SoCs support both D-PHY and C-PHY standards, but currently only
>>>> + * D-PHY is supported in the driver.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (vep.bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Unsupported bus type %d\n", vep.bus_type);
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>
>> Looks like it would break all old board dtbs, which is not just bad, but NAK.
>>
>> V4L2_MBUS_UNKNOWN shall be properly handled without the risk of regressions.
>
> Please see drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c around line 218.
> The code there sets bus_type if it's UNKNOWN
>
> if (bus_type == V4L2_MBUS_UNKNOWN)
> vep->bus_type = V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY;
>
> So setting "bus-type" in dt is not necessary, even if it makes things
> more explicit from dt side. I don't think we'll ever get UNKNOWN here in
> camss.
Thank you for pointing it out, I haven't tested the change yet, but hopefully
I will find time today to do it later on, it should exclude any doubts.
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.