tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Perf tools side uses extended mask to display the platform
supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
as part of each sample. This mask value is decided based on
the processor version ( from PVR ).
Add PVR value for power11 to enable capturing the extended regs
as part of sample in power11.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
index e8e6e6fc6f17..bd36cfd420a2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
#define PVR_POWER10 0x0080
+#define PVR_POWER11 0x0082
static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
@@ -207,7 +208,7 @@ uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
if (version == PVR_POWER9)
extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
- else if (version == PVR_POWER10)
+ else if ((version == PVR_POWER10) || (version == PVR_POWER11))
extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
else
return mask;
--
2.43.5
On 12/6/24 19:26, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> Perf tools side uses extended mask to display the platform
> supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
> as part of each sample. This mask value is decided based on
> the processor version ( from PVR ).
>
> Add PVR value for power11 to enable capturing the extended regs
> as part of sample in power11.
Patch looks fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> index e8e6e6fc6f17..bd36cfd420a2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>
> #define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
> #define PVR_POWER10 0x0080
> +#define PVR_POWER11 0x0082
>
> static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
> @@ -207,7 +208,7 @@ uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
> version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
> if (version == PVR_POWER9)
> extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
> - else if (version == PVR_POWER10)
> + else if ((version == PVR_POWER10) || (version == PVR_POWER11))
> extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
> else
> return mask;
> On 11 Dec 2024, at 5:32 PM, kajoljain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/6/24 19:26, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> Perf tools side uses extended mask to display the platform
>> supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
>> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
>> as part of each sample. This mask value is decided based on
>> the processor version ( from PVR ).
>>
>> Add PVR value for power11 to enable capturing the extended regs
>> as part of sample in power11.
>
> Patch looks fine to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Hi
Can we please pull in this patch if it looks fine.
Thanks
Athira
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
>> index e8e6e6fc6f17..bd36cfd420a2 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>
>> #define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
>> #define PVR_POWER10 0x0080
>> +#define PVR_POWER11 0x0082
>>
>> static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
>> SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
>> @@ -207,7 +208,7 @@ uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
>> version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
>> if (version == PVR_POWER9)
>> extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
>> - else if (version == PVR_POWER10)
>> + else if ((version == PVR_POWER10) || (version == PVR_POWER11))
>> extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
>> else
>> return mask;
>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 03:32:12PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote: > > On 11 Dec 2024, at 5:32 PM, kajoljain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > On 12/6/24 19:26, Athira Rajeev wrote: > >> Perf tools side uses extended mask to display the platform > >> supported register names (with -I? option) to the user > >> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers > >> as part of each sample. This mask value is decided based on > >> the processor version ( from PVR ). > >> Add PVR value for power11 to enable capturing the extended regs > >> as part of sample in power11. > > Patch looks fine to me. > > Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> > Can we please pull in this patch if it looks fine. Sure, Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, - Arnaldo
> On 16 Dec 2024, at 10:15 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 03:32:12PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote: >>> On 11 Dec 2024, at 5:32 PM, kajoljain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> wrote: >>> On 12/6/24 19:26, Athira Rajeev wrote: >>>> Perf tools side uses extended mask to display the platform >>>> supported register names (with -I? option) to the user >>>> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers >>>> as part of each sample. This mask value is decided based on >>>> the processor version ( from PVR ). > >>>> Add PVR value for power11 to enable capturing the extended regs >>>> as part of sample in power11. > >>> Patch looks fine to me. > >>> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com> > >> Can we please pull in this patch if it looks fine. > > Sure, > > Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, > > - Arnaldo Thanks Arnaldo for pulling this in Athira
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.