Parameters were created using wrong C types, which caused them to be of
wrong size on some architectures, causing problems.
The problem with SO_RCVLOWAT was found on s390 (big endian), while x86-64
didn't show it. After the fix, all tests pass on s390.
Then Stefano Garzarella pointed out that SO_VM_SOCKETS_* calls might have
a similar problem, which turned out to be true, hence, the second patch.
Changes for v8:
- Fix whitespace warnings from "checkpatch.pl --strict"
- Add maintainers to Cc:
Changes for v7:
- Rebase on top of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git
- Add the "net" tags to the subjects
Changes for v6:
- rework the patch #3 to avoid creating a new file for new functions,
and exclude vsock_perf from calling the new functions.
- add "Reviewed-by:" to the patch #2.
Changes for v5:
- in the patch #2 replace the introduced uint64_t with unsigned long long
to match documentation
- add a patch #3 that verifies every setsockopt() call.
Changes for v4:
- add "Reviewed-by:" to the first patch, and add a second patch fixing
SO_VM_SOCKETS_* calls, which depends on the first one (hence, it's now
a patch series.)
Changes for v3:
- fix the same problem in vsock_perf and update commit message
Changes for v2:
- add "Fixes:" lines to the commit message
Konstantin Shkolnyy (3):
vsock/test: fix failures due to wrong SO_RCVLOWAT parameter
vsock/test: fix parameter types in SO_VM_SOCKETS_* calls
vsock/test: verify socket options after setting them
tools/testing/vsock/control.c | 9 +-
tools/testing/vsock/msg_zerocopy_common.c | 10 --
tools/testing/vsock/msg_zerocopy_common.h | 1 -
tools/testing/vsock/util.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/vsock/util.h | 7 ++
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c | 20 ++-
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 75 ++++++------
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test_zerocopy.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_uring_test.c | 2 +-
9 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1