The code is running arithmentics with the enum, which when not done with
care makes the compiler a bit nervous.
Because those enums are only used as defines (no argument or variable
from that enumeration type), convert it into a define and move on.
It is required to build with llvm 9 without these warnings:
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:673:17: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum TS_PORT' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:680:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:687:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:702:17: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum TS_PORT' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:709:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum TS_PORT' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:718:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:727:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum TS_PORT') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:737:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum TS_PORT') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:749:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum TS_PORT') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
---
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h | 18 +++++++-----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h
index 5bc44f194d0a..62ffa16bb82c 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h
@@ -57,19 +57,17 @@ enum USB_SPEED{
};
#define TS_MASK 0x6
-enum TS_PORT{
- NO_TS_PORT = 0x0, /* 2'b00: Neither port used. PCB not a Hybrid,
+#define NO_TS_PORT 0x0 /* 2'b00: Neither port used. PCB not a Hybrid,
only offers Analog TV or Video */
- TS1_PORT = 0x4, /* 2'b10: TS1 Input (Hybrid mode :
+#define TS1_PORT 0x4 /* 2'b10: TS1 Input (Hybrid mode :
Digital or External Analog/Compressed source) */
- TS1_TS2_PORT = 0x6, /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 Inputs
+#define TS1_TS2_PORT 0x6 /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 Inputs
(Dual inputs from Digital and/or
External Analog/Compressed sources) */
- TS1_EXT_CLOCK = 0x6, /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 as selector
+#define TS1_EXT_CLOCK 0x6 /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 as selector
to external clock */
- TS1VIP_TS2_PORT = 0x2 /* 2'b01: TS1 used as 656/VIP Output,
+#define TS1VIP_TS2_PORT 0x2 /* 2'b01: TS1 used as 656/VIP Output,
TS2 Input (from Compressor) */
-};
#define EAVP_MASK 0x8
enum EAV_PRESENT{
@@ -89,10 +87,8 @@ enum AT_MODE{
};
#define PWR_SEL_MASK 0x40
-enum POWE_TYPE{
- SELF_POWER = 0x0, /* 0: self power */
- BUS_POWER = 0x40 /* 1: bus power */
-};
+#define SELF_POWER 0x0 /* 0: self power */
+#define BUS_POWER 0x40 /* 1: bus power */
enum USB_POWE_TYPE{
USB_SELF_POWER = 0,
--
2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
Em Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:47:15 +0000
Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> escreveu:
> The code is running arithmentics with the enum, which when not done with
> care makes the compiler a bit nervous.
>
> Because those enums are only used as defines (no argument or variable
> from that enumeration type), convert it into a define and move on.
>
> It is required to build with llvm 9 without these warnings:
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:673:17: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum TS_PORT' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:680:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:687:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:702:17: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum TS_PORT' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:709:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum TS_PORT' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:718:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:727:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum TS_PORT') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:737:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum TS_PORT') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:749:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum TS_PORT') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h | 18 +++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h
> index 5bc44f194d0a..62ffa16bb82c 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h
> @@ -57,19 +57,17 @@ enum USB_SPEED{
> };
>
> #define TS_MASK 0x6
> -enum TS_PORT{
> - NO_TS_PORT = 0x0, /* 2'b00: Neither port used. PCB not a Hybrid,
> +#define NO_TS_PORT 0x0 /* 2'b00: Neither port used. PCB not a Hybrid,
> only offers Analog TV or Video */
> - TS1_PORT = 0x4, /* 2'b10: TS1 Input (Hybrid mode :
> +#define TS1_PORT 0x4 /* 2'b10: TS1 Input (Hybrid mode :
> Digital or External Analog/Compressed source) */
> - TS1_TS2_PORT = 0x6, /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 Inputs
> +#define TS1_TS2_PORT 0x6 /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 Inputs
> (Dual inputs from Digital and/or
> External Analog/Compressed sources) */
> - TS1_EXT_CLOCK = 0x6, /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 as selector
> +#define TS1_EXT_CLOCK 0x6 /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 as selector
> to external clock */
> - TS1VIP_TS2_PORT = 0x2 /* 2'b01: TS1 used as 656/VIP Output,
> +#define TS1VIP_TS2_PORT 0x2 /* 2'b01: TS1 used as 656/VIP Output,
> TS2 Input (from Compressor) */
> -};
>
> #define EAVP_MASK 0x8
> enum EAV_PRESENT{
> @@ -89,10 +87,8 @@ enum AT_MODE{
> };
>
> #define PWR_SEL_MASK 0x40
> -enum POWE_TYPE{
> - SELF_POWER = 0x0, /* 0: self power */
> - BUS_POWER = 0x40 /* 1: bus power */
> -};
> +#define SELF_POWER 0x0 /* 0: self power */
> +#define BUS_POWER 0x40 /* 1: bus power */
>
> enum USB_POWE_TYPE{
> USB_SELF_POWER = 0,
>
IMO keeping them into enums are a lot better than defines.
Perhaps the right thing would be to join both enums here.
Thanks,
Mauro
On 12/3/24 09:31, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:47:15 +0000
> Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> escreveu:
>
>> The code is running arithmentics with the enum, which when not done with
>> care makes the compiler a bit nervous.
>>
>> Because those enums are only used as defines (no argument or variable
>> from that enumeration type), convert it into a define and move on.
>>
>> It is required to build with llvm 9 without these warnings:
>> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:673:17: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum TS_PORT' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
>> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:680:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
>> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:687:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
>> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:702:17: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum TS_PORT' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
>> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:709:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum TS_PORT' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
>> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:718:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum POWE_TYPE') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
>> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:727:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum TS_PORT') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
>> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:737:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum TS_PORT') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
>> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.c:749:21: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum AVDEC_STATUS' and 'enum TS_PORT') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h | 18 +++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h
>> index 5bc44f194d0a..62ffa16bb82c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-pcb-cfg.h
>> @@ -57,19 +57,17 @@ enum USB_SPEED{
>> };
>>
>> #define TS_MASK 0x6
>> -enum TS_PORT{
>> - NO_TS_PORT = 0x0, /* 2'b00: Neither port used. PCB not a Hybrid,
>> +#define NO_TS_PORT 0x0 /* 2'b00: Neither port used. PCB not a Hybrid,
>> only offers Analog TV or Video */
>> - TS1_PORT = 0x4, /* 2'b10: TS1 Input (Hybrid mode :
>> +#define TS1_PORT 0x4 /* 2'b10: TS1 Input (Hybrid mode :
>> Digital or External Analog/Compressed source) */
>> - TS1_TS2_PORT = 0x6, /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 Inputs
>> +#define TS1_TS2_PORT 0x6 /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 Inputs
>> (Dual inputs from Digital and/or
>> External Analog/Compressed sources) */
>> - TS1_EXT_CLOCK = 0x6, /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 as selector
>> +#define TS1_EXT_CLOCK 0x6 /* 2'b11: TS1 & TS2 as selector
>> to external clock */
>> - TS1VIP_TS2_PORT = 0x2 /* 2'b01: TS1 used as 656/VIP Output,
>> +#define TS1VIP_TS2_PORT 0x2 /* 2'b01: TS1 used as 656/VIP Output,
>> TS2 Input (from Compressor) */
>> -};
>>
>> #define EAVP_MASK 0x8
>> enum EAV_PRESENT{
>> @@ -89,10 +87,8 @@ enum AT_MODE{
>> };
>>
>> #define PWR_SEL_MASK 0x40
>> -enum POWE_TYPE{
>> - SELF_POWER = 0x0, /* 0: self power */
>> - BUS_POWER = 0x40 /* 1: bus power */
>> -};
>> +#define SELF_POWER 0x0 /* 0: self power */
>> +#define BUS_POWER 0x40 /* 1: bus power */
>>
>> enum USB_POWE_TYPE{
>> USB_SELF_POWER = 0,
>>
>
> IMO keeping them into enums are a lot better than defines.
>
> Perhaps the right thing would be to join both enums here.
ORing enums is really not a good idea: you would normally never do that, and the
compiler warning is IMHO appropriate.
I think this is a good change and I plan to take this.
Regards,
Hans
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:55:42PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 12/3/24 09:31, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: ... > ORing enums is really not a good idea: you would normally never do that, and I think you missed a keyword "different", so "ORing different enums ..." which I totally agree on, but the same enum values are fine. > the compiler warning is IMHO appropriate. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On 2/20/25 15:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:55:42PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> On 12/3/24 09:31, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > ... > >> ORing enums is really not a good idea: you would normally never do that, and > > I think you missed a keyword "different", so "ORing different enums ..." > which I totally agree on, but the same enum values are fine. While the compiler might be happy with that, I think ORing enums regardless is weird. It's not what enums are for. Regards, Hans > >> the compiler warning is IMHO appropriate. >
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 04:12:38PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 2/20/25 15:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:55:42PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > >> On 12/3/24 09:31, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: ... > >> ORing enums is really not a good idea: you would normally never do that, and > > > > I think you missed a keyword "different", so "ORing different enums ..." > > which I totally agree on, but the same enum values are fine. > > While the compiler might be happy with that, I think ORing enums regardless > is weird. It's not what enums are for. I disagree. It's totally normal to have "mixed" enums where we have ranges of sequential values mixed with bit flags. Cross-enum bit operations (and what this patch is about) should be prohibited, indeed. > >> the compiler warning is IMHO appropriate. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.