[PATCH v1 0/3] x86/Documentation: boot.rst: More style &format fixes

Andy Shevchenko posted 3 patches 1 year, 2 months ago
Documentation/arch/x86/boot.rst | 369 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 184 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-)
[PATCH v1 0/3] x86/Documentation: boot.rst: More style &format fixes
Posted by Andy Shevchenko 1 year, 2 months ago
The boot.rst is combined from the pieces of different epochs, hence has
some inconsistencies in style and format. Fix (some of) them in this
mini-series. Rendered result has been manually checked for PDF and HTML.

Andy Shevchenko (3):
  x86/Documentation: Make Literal Blocks to follow reStructuredText
    specification
  x86/Documentation: Align Note Blocks style
  x86/Documentation: Elaborate Intel MID device list

 Documentation/arch/x86/boot.rst | 369 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 184 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac
Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] x86/Documentation: boot.rst: More style &format fixes
Posted by Jonathan Corbet 1 year, 2 months ago
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> writes:

> The boot.rst is combined from the pieces of different epochs, hence has
> some inconsistencies in style and format. Fix (some of) them in this
> mini-series. Rendered result has been manually checked for PDF and HTML.
>
> Andy Shevchenko (3):
>   x86/Documentation: Make Literal Blocks to follow reStructuredText
>     specification
>   x86/Documentation: Align Note Blocks style
>   x86/Documentation: Elaborate Intel MID device list
>
>  Documentation/arch/x86/boot.rst | 369 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 184 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-)

How were you thinking of getting this one upstream?  I can take it
through docs if that's what's wanted, but would like an x86 ack first.

Thanks,

jon
Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] x86/Documentation: boot.rst: More style &format fixes
Posted by Dave Hansen 1 year, 2 months ago
On 12/6/24 08:47, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> How were you thinking of getting this one upstream?  I can take it
> through docs if that's what's wanted, but would like an x86 ack first.

It all looks sane to me.  Going through docs works for me.  Thanks, Jon!

For the series:

Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] x86/Documentation: boot.rst: More style &format fixes
Posted by Jonathan Corbet 1 year, 2 months ago
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> writes:

> On 12/6/24 08:47, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> How were you thinking of getting this one upstream?  I can take it
>> through docs if that's what's wanted, but would like an x86 ack first.
>
> It all looks sane to me.  Going through docs works for me.  Thanks, Jon!
>
> For the series:
>
> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

OK, then, I've applied the set.

Thanks,

jon