Removed hba->clk_gating.active_reqs check from ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy
function to separate clock gating logic from general device busy checks.

Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index e0a7ef1cb052..838bbab97438 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -266,8 +266,7 @@ static bool ufshcd_has_pending_tasks(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 
 static bool ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 {
-	return hba->clk_gating.active_reqs || hba->outstanding_reqs ||
-	       ufshcd_has_pending_tasks(hba);
+	return hba->outstanding_reqs || ufshcd_has_pending_tasks(hba);
 }
 
 static const struct ufs_dev_quirk ufs_fixups[] = {
@@ -1949,7 +1948,9 @@ static void ufshcd_gate_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		goto rel_lock;
 	}
 
-	if (ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(hba) || hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL)
+	if (ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(hba) ||
+	    hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL ||
+	    hba->clk_gating.active_reqs)
 		goto rel_lock;
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
@@ -8262,7 +8263,9 @@ static void ufshcd_rtc_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	hba = container_of(to_delayed_work(work), struct ufs_hba, ufs_rtc_update_work);
 
 	 /* Update RTC only when there are no requests in progress and UFSHCI is operational */
-	if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(hba) && hba->ufshcd_state == UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL)
+	if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(hba) &&
+	    hba->ufshcd_state == UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL &&
+	    !hba->clk_gating.active_reqs)
 		ufshcd_update_rtc(hba);
 
 	if (ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba) && hba->dev_info.rtc_update_period)
-- 
2.25.1

On 11/23/24 11:08 PM, Avri Altman wrote:
> Removed hba->clk_gating.active_reqs check from ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy
> function to separate clock gating logic from general device busy checks.

Patch descriptions should use the imperative mood. If this series
is reposted, please change "removed" into "remove". Since otherwise
this patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>