Add an ICE node to qcs8300 SoC description and enable it by adding a
phandle to the UFS node.
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Ranganathan <quic_yrangana@quicinc.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
index 2c35f96c3f28..ab91c3b7bba6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
@@ -685,6 +685,7 @@ &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 0>,
<0 0>,
<0 0>,
<0 0>;
+ qcom,ice = <&ice>;
status = "disabled";
};
@@ -710,6 +711,13 @@ ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
status = "disabled";
};
+ ice: crypto@1d88000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-inline-crypto-engine",
+ "qcom,inline-crypto-engine";
+ reg = <0x0 0x01d88000 0x0 0x18000>;
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
+ };
+
tcsr_mutex: hwlock@1f40000 {
compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex";
reg = <0x0 0x01f40000 0x0 0x20000>;
--
2.34.1
On 22/11/2024 14:20, Yuvaraj Ranganathan wrote: > Add an ICE node to qcs8300 SoC description and enable it by adding a > phandle to the UFS node. > > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> This did not happen. Provide a proof (lore link). Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof, Same mistake is done for this patch series as well. I sincerely apologize for the inconvenience. I will remove the tag in the next patch series. Thanks, Yuvaraj. On 11/22/2024 8:25 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 22/11/2024 14:20, Yuvaraj Ranganathan wrote: >> Add an ICE node to qcs8300 SoC description and enable it by adding a >> phandle to the UFS node. >> >> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> > > This did not happen. Provide a proof (lore link). > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
On 22.11.2024 2:20 PM, Yuvaraj Ranganathan wrote:
> Add an ICE node to qcs8300 SoC description and enable it by adding a
> phandle to the UFS node.
>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Getting *a review* does *not* mean I gave you a Reviewed-by tag.
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#using-reported-by-tested-by-reviewed-by-suggested-by-and-fixes
> Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Ranganathan <quic_yrangana@quicinc.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
> index 2c35f96c3f28..ab91c3b7bba6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
> @@ -685,6 +685,7 @@ &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 0>,
> <0 0>,
> <0 0>,
> <0 0>;
> + qcom,ice = <&ice>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> @@ -710,6 +711,13 @@ ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + ice: crypto@1d88000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-inline-crypto-engine",
> + "qcom,inline-crypto-engine";
> + reg = <0x0 0x01d88000 0x0 0x18000>;
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
> + };
Although this looks good now, so I'll allow you to keep it.
I won't add it a second time here to avoid confusing the maintainer
tools.
Konrad
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.