[PATCH RFC net-next v3 25/27] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: microchip,pd692x0: Add manager regulator supply

Kory Maincent posted 27 patches 2 days, 14 hours ago
[PATCH RFC net-next v3 25/27] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: microchip,pd692x0: Add manager regulator supply
Posted by Kory Maincent 2 days, 14 hours ago
From: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>

This patch adds the regulator supply parameter of the managers.
It updates also the example as the regulator supply of the PSE PIs
should be the managers itself and not an external regulator.

Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
---

Changes in v3:
- New patch
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/net/pse-pd/microchip,pd692x0.yaml    | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/pse-pd/microchip,pd692x0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/pse-pd/microchip,pd692x0.yaml
index fd4244fceced..0dc0da32576b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/pse-pd/microchip,pd692x0.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/pse-pd/microchip,pd692x0.yaml
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ properties:
           "#size-cells":
             const: 0
 
+          vmain-supply:
+            description: Regulator power supply for the PD69208X manager.
+
         patternProperties:
           '^port@[0-7]$':
             type: object
@@ -106,10 +109,11 @@ examples:
           #address-cells = <1>;
           #size-cells = <0>;
 
-          manager@0 {
+          manager0: manager@0 {
             reg = <0>;
             #address-cells = <1>;
             #size-cells = <0>;
+            vmain-supply = <&pse1_supply>;
 
             phys0: port@0 {
               reg = <0>;
@@ -128,7 +132,7 @@ examples:
             };
           };
 
-          manager@1 {
+          manager1: manager@1 {
             reg = <1>;
             #address-cells = <1>;
             #size-cells = <0>;
@@ -161,7 +165,7 @@ examples:
             pairset-names = "alternative-a", "alternative-b";
             pairsets = <&phys0>, <&phys1>;
             polarity-supported = "MDI", "S";
-            vpwr-supply = <&vpwr1>;
+            vpwr-supply = <&manager0>;
           };
           pse_pi1: pse-pi@1 {
             reg = <1>;
@@ -169,7 +173,7 @@ examples:
             pairset-names = "alternative-a";
             pairsets = <&phys2>;
             polarity-supported = "MDI";
-            vpwr-supply = <&vpwr2>;
+            vpwr-supply = <&manager0>;
           };
         };
       };

-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 25/27] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: microchip,pd692x0: Add manager regulator supply
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 day, 21 hours ago
On 21/11/2024 15:42, Kory Maincent wrote:
> From: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
> 
> This patch adds the regulator supply parameter of the managers.
> It updates also the example as the regulator supply of the PSE PIs
> should be the managers itself and not an external regulator.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
> ---
> 


<form letter>
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
</form letter>

... unless you do not expect review.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 25/27] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: microchip,pd692x0: Add manager regulator supply
Posted by Kory Maincent 1 day, 20 hours ago
Hello Krzysztof,

On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:58:26 +0100
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:

> On 21/11/2024 15:42, Kory Maincent wrote:
> > From: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
> > 
> > This patch adds the regulator supply parameter of the managers.
> > It updates also the example as the regulator supply of the PSE PIs
> > should be the managers itself and not an external regulator.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >   
> 
> 
> <form letter>
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
> 
> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
> (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
> fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
> patches to the patchset.
> 
> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
> tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
> a waste of time.
> 
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
> </form letter>
> 
> ... unless you do not expect review.

Indeed I didn't expected binding reviews on this series that's why I did not add
you and devicetree mailing list to the CC. I would like to confirm the core PSE
design choices before that.
Maybe I should have notify it somewhere to avoid you these emails, sorry.

Regards,
-- 
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 25/27] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: microchip,pd692x0: Add manager regulator supply
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 day, 19 hours ago
On 22/11/2024 09:42, Kory Maincent wrote:
>> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
>> tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
>> a waste of time.
>>
>> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
>> </form letter>
>>
>> ... unless you do not expect review.
> 
> Indeed I didn't expected binding reviews on this series that's why I did not add
> you and devicetree mailing list to the CC. I would like to confirm the core PSE
> design choices before that.
> Maybe I should have notify it somewhere to avoid you these emails, sorry.
No worries, I just never know whether this is intentional.

Best regards,
Krzysztof