Add SPI NAND support for ipq9574 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>
---
Change in [v14]
* No change
Change in [v13]
* No change
Change in [v12]
* No change
Change in [v11]
* No change
Change in [v10]
* No change
Change in [v9]
* No change
Change in [v8]
* No change
Change in [v7]
* No change
Change in [v6]
* No change
Change in [v5]
* No change
Change in [v4]
* No change
Change in [v3]
* Updated gpio number as per pin control driver
* Fixed alignment issue
Change in [v2]
* Added initial enablement for spi-nand
Change in [v1]
* Posted as RFC patch for design review
.../boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi | 43 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 27 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi
index 91e104b0f865..6429a6b3b903 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi
@@ -139,6 +139,49 @@ gpio_leds_default: gpio-leds-default-state {
drive-strength = <8>;
bias-pull-up;
};
+
+ qpic_snand_default_state: qpic-snand-default-state {
+ clock-pins {
+ pins = "gpio5";
+ function = "qspi_clk";
+ drive-strength = <8>;
+ bias-disable;
+ };
+
+ cs-pins {
+ pins = "gpio4";
+ function = "qspi_cs";
+ drive-strength = <8>;
+ bias-disable;
+ };
+
+ data-pins {
+ pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3";
+ function = "qspi_data";
+ drive-strength = <8>;
+ bias-disable;
+ };
+ };
+};
+
+&qpic_bam {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
+&qpic_nand {
+ pinctrl-0 = <&qpic_snand_default_state>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ status = "okay";
+
+ flash@0 {
+ compatible = "spi-nand";
+ reg = <0>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ nand-ecc-engine = <&qpic_nand>;
+ nand-ecc-strength = <4>;
+ nand-ecc-step-size = <512>;
+ };
};
&usb_0_dwc3 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
index d1fd35ebc4a2..45fb26bc9480 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
@@ -330,6 +330,33 @@ tcsr: syscon@1937000 {
reg = <0x01937000 0x21000>;
};
+ qpic_bam: dma-controller@7984000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.7.0";
+ reg = <0x7984000 0x1c000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 146 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_QPIC_AHB_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "bam_clk";
+ #dma-cells = <1>;
+ qcom,ee = <0>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
+ qpic_nand: spi@79b0000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-snand";
+ reg = <0x79b0000 0x10000>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ clocks = <&gcc GCC_QPIC_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_QPIC_AHB_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_QPIC_IO_MACRO_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "core", "aon", "iom";
+ dmas = <&qpic_bam 0>,
+ <&qpic_bam 1>,
+ <&qpic_bam 2>;
+ dma-names = "tx", "rx", "cmd";
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
sdhc_1: mmc@7804000 {
compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
reg = <0x07804000 0x1000>,
--
2.34.1
On 20.11.2024 10:15 AM, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> Add SPI NAND support for ipq9574 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>
> ---
[...]
Feel free to put dt patches in a separate series after Miquel picks
up the mtd changes
> &usb_0_dwc3 {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> index d1fd35ebc4a2..45fb26bc9480 100644
board and dtsi patches should be 2 separate ones
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> @@ -330,6 +330,33 @@ tcsr: syscon@1937000 {
> reg = <0x01937000 0x21000>;
> };
>
> + qpic_bam: dma-controller@7984000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.7.0";
> + reg = <0x7984000 0x1c000>;
Please pad the address part to 8 hex digits with leading zeroes
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 146 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_QPIC_AHB_CLK>;
> + clock-names = "bam_clk";
> + #dma-cells = <1>;
> + qcom,ee = <0>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + qpic_nand: spi@79b0000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-snand";
> + reg = <0x79b0000 0x10000>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_QPIC_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_QPIC_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_QPIC_IO_MACRO_CLK>;
> + clock-names = "core", "aon", "iom";
> + dmas = <&qpic_bam 0>,
> + <&qpic_bam 1>,
> + <&qpic_bam 2>;
> + dma-names = "tx", "rx", "cmd";
Please make clock/dma names a vertical list, like clocks/dmas
Also, is it okay not to use any of the GCC_QPIC_BCR/
GCC_QPIC_AHB_ARES/GCC_QPIC_ARES resets found in GCC?
Konrad
On 12/5/2024 10:49 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 20.11.2024 10:15 AM, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>> Add SPI NAND support for ipq9574 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
> Feel free to put dt patches in a separate series after Miquel picks
> up the mtd changes
Ok
>
>> &usb_0_dwc3 {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> index d1fd35ebc4a2..45fb26bc9480 100644
>
> board and dtsi patches should be 2 separate ones
Ok
>
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> @@ -330,6 +330,33 @@ tcsr: syscon@1937000 {
>> reg = <0x01937000 0x21000>;
>> };
>>
>> + qpic_bam: dma-controller@7984000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.7.0";
>> + reg = <0x7984000 0x1c000>;
>
> Please pad the address part to 8 hex digits with leading zeroes
Ok
>
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 146 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_QPIC_AHB_CLK>;
>> + clock-names = "bam_clk";
>> + #dma-cells = <1>;
>> + qcom,ee = <0>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>> + qpic_nand: spi@79b0000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-snand";
>> + reg = <0x79b0000 0x10000>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_QPIC_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_QPIC_AHB_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_QPIC_IO_MACRO_CLK>;
>> + clock-names = "core", "aon", "iom";
>> + dmas = <&qpic_bam 0>,
>> + <&qpic_bam 1>,
>> + <&qpic_bam 2>;
>> + dma-names = "tx", "rx", "cmd";
>
> Please make clock/dma names a vertical list, like clocks/dmas
Ok
>
> Also, is it okay not to use any of the GCC_QPIC_BCR/
> GCC_QPIC_AHB_ARES/GCC_QPIC_ARES resets found in GCC?
It's recommended by HW team, will check once again with HW
team.
>
> Konrad
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.