[PATCH] docs: remove duplicate word

Ruffalo Lavoisier posted 1 patch 1 year, 2 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] docs: remove duplicate word
Posted by Ruffalo Lavoisier 1 year, 2 months ago
- Remove duplicate word, 'to'.
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst
index 30c61474dec5..43b128c0225b 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ pre-allocation or re-sizing of any kernel data structures.
 dentry-negative
 ----------------------------
 
-Policy for negative dentries. Set to 1 to to always delete the dentry when a
+Policy for negative dentries. Set to 1 to always delete the dentry when a
 file is removed, and 0 to disable it. By default, this behavior is disabled.
 
 dentry-state
-- 
2.46.1
Re: [PATCH] docs: remove duplicate word
Posted by Jonathan Corbet 1 year, 2 months ago
Ruffalo Lavoisier <ruffalolavoisier@gmail.com> writes:

> - Remove duplicate word, 'to'.
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst
> index 30c61474dec5..43b128c0225b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/fs.rst
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ pre-allocation or re-sizing of any kernel data structures.
>  dentry-negative
>  ----------------------------
>  
> -Policy for negative dentries. Set to 1 to to always delete the dentry when a
> +Policy for negative dentries. Set to 1 to always delete the dentry when a
>  file is removed, and 0 to disable it. By default, this behavior is disabled.

This patch lacks a Signed-off-by line; please see
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.

In this case, it is trivial enough that I have applied it anyway, but
any future changes will need to be properly signed off.

Thanks,

jon