[PATCHv1 0/8] zram: introduce multi-handle entries

Sergey Senozhatsky posted 8 patches 4 days, 5 hours ago
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 368 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h |  12 +-
include/linux/zsmalloc.h      |   2 +
mm/zsmalloc.c                 |   2 -
4 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)
[PATCHv1 0/8] zram: introduce multi-handle entries
Posted by Sergey Senozhatsky 4 days, 5 hours ago
	ZRAM_HUGE objects are incompressible and each takes a whole
physical page on the zsmalloc side.  zsmalloc pool, naturally, has
some internal memory fragmentation (within size-classes), so what
we can do for ZRAM_HUGE objects is to split them into several
smaller objects (2 at this point) and store those parts individually
in regular size-classes (hence multi-handle entries). This, basically,
lets us to use already allocated (but unused) zspages memory for
ZRAM_HUGE objects, instead of unconditional allocation of 0-order
page for each ZRAM_HUGE object.

v1:
-- reworked ZRAM_SAME patch (added missing slot lock guard for slot
   flags operation, added missing .pages_stored bump, factored out
   into a separate function)
-- renamed mhandle defines and added mhandle tail len define
-- fixed some typos

Sergey Senozhatsky (8):
  zram: cond_resched() in writeback loop
  zram: free slot memory early during write
  zram: remove entry element member
  zram: factor out ZRAM_SAME write
  zram: factor out ZRAM_HUGE write
  zram: factor out ZRAM_HUGE read
  zsmalloc: move ZS_HANDLE_SIZE to zsmalloc header
  zram: introduce multi-handle entries

 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 368 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h |  12 +-
 include/linux/zsmalloc.h      |   2 +
 mm/zsmalloc.c                 |   2 -
 4 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.0.371.ga323438b13-goog
Re: [PATCHv1 0/8] zram: introduce multi-handle entries
Posted by Sergey Senozhatsky 4 days, 3 hours ago
On (24/11/19 16:20), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> 	ZRAM_HUGE objects are incompressible and each takes a whole
> physical page on the zsmalloc side.  zsmalloc pool, naturally, has
> some internal memory fragmentation (within size-classes), so what
> we can do for ZRAM_HUGE objects is to split them into several
> smaller objects (2 at this point) and store those parts individually
> in regular size-classes (hence multi-handle entries). This, basically,
> lets us to use already allocated (but unused) zspages memory for
> ZRAM_HUGE objects, instead of unconditional allocation of 0-order
> page for each ZRAM_HUGE object.

Forgot to mention, this is still just "RFC".