fs/jbd2/journal.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
The code indicates that journal_init_common() fills the journal_t object
it returns while the comment incorrectly states that only a few fields are
initialised. Also, the comment claims that journal structures could be
created from scratch which isn't possible as journal_init_common() calls
journal_load_superblock() which loads and checks journal superblock from
disk.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Martín Gómez <dalme@riseup.net>
---
fs/jbd2/journal.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
index 97f487c3d8fc..3c1d42133687 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
@@ -1518,9 +1518,10 @@ static int journal_load_superblock(journal_t *journal)
* destroy journal_t structures, and to initialise and read existing
* journal blocks from disk. */
-/* First: create and setup a journal_t object in memory. We initialise
- * very few fields yet: that has to wait until we have created the
- * journal structures from from scratch, or loaded them from disk. */
+/* The journal_init_common() function creates and fills a journal_t object
+ * in memory. It calls journal_load_superblock() to load the on-disk journal
+ * superblock and initialize the journal_t object.
+ */
static journal_t *journal_init_common(struct block_device *bdev,
struct block_device *fs_dev,
--
2.39.5
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:45:38 +0100, Daniel Martín Gómez wrote: > The code indicates that journal_init_common() fills the journal_t object > it returns while the comment incorrectly states that only a few fields are > initialised. Also, the comment claims that journal structures could be > created from scratch which isn't possible as journal_init_common() calls > journal_load_superblock() which loads and checks journal superblock from > disk. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] jbd2: Fix comment describing journal_init_common() commit: 3e7c69cdb053f9edea95502853f35952ab6cbf06 Best regards, -- Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
On 2024/11/7 22:45, Daniel Martín Gómez wrote: > The code indicates that journal_init_common() fills the journal_t object > it returns while the comment incorrectly states that only a few fields are > initialised. Also, the comment claims that journal structures could be > created from scratch which isn't possible as journal_init_common() calls > journal_load_superblock() which loads and checks journal superblock from > disk. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Martín Gómez <dalme@riseup.net> Ha, thank you for the fix. This comment became stale after commit c30713084ba5 ("jbd2:move load_superblock() into journal_init_common()") in the "ext4,jbd2: cleanup journal load and initialization process" series. Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> > --- > fs/jbd2/journal.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c > index 97f487c3d8fc..3c1d42133687 100644 > --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c > +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c > @@ -1518,9 +1518,10 @@ static int journal_load_superblock(journal_t *journal) > * destroy journal_t structures, and to initialise and read existing > * journal blocks from disk. */ > > -/* First: create and setup a journal_t object in memory. We initialise > - * very few fields yet: that has to wait until we have created the > - * journal structures from from scratch, or loaded them from disk. */ > +/* The journal_init_common() function creates and fills a journal_t object > + * in memory. It calls journal_load_superblock() to load the on-disk journal > + * superblock and initialize the journal_t object. > + */ > > static journal_t *journal_init_common(struct block_device *bdev, > struct block_device *fs_dev,
On Thu 07-11-24 15:45:38, Daniel Martín Gómez wrote: > The code indicates that journal_init_common() fills the journal_t object > it returns while the comment incorrectly states that only a few fields are > initialised. Also, the comment claims that journal structures could be > created from scratch which isn't possible as journal_init_common() calls > journal_load_superblock() which loads and checks journal superblock from > disk. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Martín Gómez <dalme@riseup.net> Indeed. Thanks for fixing this up. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Honza > --- > fs/jbd2/journal.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c > index 97f487c3d8fc..3c1d42133687 100644 > --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c > +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c > @@ -1518,9 +1518,10 @@ static int journal_load_superblock(journal_t *journal) > * destroy journal_t structures, and to initialise and read existing > * journal blocks from disk. */ > > -/* First: create and setup a journal_t object in memory. We initialise > - * very few fields yet: that has to wait until we have created the > - * journal structures from from scratch, or loaded them from disk. */ > +/* The journal_init_common() function creates and fills a journal_t object > + * in memory. It calls journal_load_superblock() to load the on-disk journal > + * superblock and initialize the journal_t object. > + */ > > static journal_t *journal_init_common(struct block_device *bdev, > struct block_device *fs_dev, > -- > 2.39.5 > > -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> SUSE Labs, CR
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.