[PATCH v2 2/3] perf cpumap: Add more tests for CPU map merging

Leo Yan posted 3 patches 2 weeks, 2 days ago
[PATCH v2 2/3] perf cpumap: Add more tests for CPU map merging
Posted by Leo Yan 2 weeks, 2 days ago
Add additional tests for CPU map merging to cover more cases.

These tests include different types of arguments, such as when one CPU
map is a subset of another, as well as cases with or without overlap
between the two maps.

Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c b/tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c
index 7f189d57232f..f8187a801b8e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c
@@ -156,21 +156,45 @@ static int test__cpu_map_print(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subte
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int test__cpu_map_merge(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused)
+static int __test__cpu_map_merge(const char *lhs, const char *rhs, int nr, const char *expected)
 {
-	struct perf_cpu_map *a = perf_cpu_map__new("4,2,1");
-	struct perf_cpu_map *b = perf_cpu_map__new("4,5,7");
+	struct perf_cpu_map *a = perf_cpu_map__new(lhs);
+	struct perf_cpu_map *b = perf_cpu_map__new(rhs);
 	char buf[100];
 
 	perf_cpu_map__merge(&a, b);
-	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to merge map: bad nr", perf_cpu_map__nr(a) == 5);
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to merge map: bad nr", perf_cpu_map__nr(a) == nr);
 	cpu_map__snprint(a, buf, sizeof(buf));
-	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to merge map: bad result", !strcmp(buf, "1-2,4-5,7"));
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to merge map: bad result", !strcmp(buf, expected));
 	perf_cpu_map__put(b);
 	perf_cpu_map__put(a);
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int test__cpu_map_merge(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
+			       int subtest __maybe_unused)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("4,2,1", "4,5,7", 5, "1-2,4-5,7");
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("1-8", "6-9", 9, "1-9");
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("1-8,12-20", "6-9,15", 18, "1-9,12-20");
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("4,2,1", "1", 3, "1-2,4");
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("1", "4,2,1", 3, "1-2,4");
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("1", "1", 1, "1");
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int __test__cpu_map_intersect(const char *lhs, const char *rhs, int nr, const char *expected)
 {
 	struct perf_cpu_map *a = perf_cpu_map__new(lhs);
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf cpumap: Add more tests for CPU map merging
Posted by Adrian Hunter 1 week, 1 day ago
On 7/11/24 14:53, Leo Yan wrote:
> Add additional tests for CPU map merging to cover more cases.
> 
> These tests include different types of arguments, such as when one CPU
> map is a subset of another, as well as cases with or without overlap
> between the two maps.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c b/tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c
> index 7f189d57232f..f8187a801b8e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c
> @@ -156,21 +156,45 @@ static int test__cpu_map_print(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subte
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int test__cpu_map_merge(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused)
> +static int __test__cpu_map_merge(const char *lhs, const char *rhs, int nr, const char *expected)
>  {
> -	struct perf_cpu_map *a = perf_cpu_map__new("4,2,1");
> -	struct perf_cpu_map *b = perf_cpu_map__new("4,5,7");
> +	struct perf_cpu_map *a = perf_cpu_map__new(lhs);
> +	struct perf_cpu_map *b = perf_cpu_map__new(rhs);
>  	char buf[100];
>  
>  	perf_cpu_map__merge(&a, b);
> -	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to merge map: bad nr", perf_cpu_map__nr(a) == 5);
> +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to merge map: bad nr", perf_cpu_map__nr(a) == nr);
>  	cpu_map__snprint(a, buf, sizeof(buf));
> -	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to merge map: bad result", !strcmp(buf, "1-2,4-5,7"));
> +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to merge map: bad result", !strcmp(buf, expected));
>  	perf_cpu_map__put(b);
>  	perf_cpu_map__put(a);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int test__cpu_map_merge(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> +			       int subtest __maybe_unused)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("4,2,1", "4,5,7", 5, "1-2,4-5,7");
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("1-8", "6-9", 9, "1-9");
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("1-8,12-20", "6-9,15", 18, "1-9,12-20");
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("4,2,1", "1", 3, "1-2,4");
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("1", "4,2,1", 3, "1-2,4");
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = __test__cpu_map_merge("1", "1", 1, "1");
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int __test__cpu_map_intersect(const char *lhs, const char *rhs, int nr, const char *expected)
>  {
>  	struct perf_cpu_map *a = perf_cpu_map__new(lhs);