[PATCH v2] mmc: mtk-sd: Fix error handle of probe function

Andy-ld Lu posted 1 patch 2 weeks, 2 days ago
drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[PATCH v2] mmc: mtk-sd: Fix error handle of probe function
Posted by Andy-ld Lu 2 weeks, 2 days ago
In the probe function, it goes to 'release_mem' label and returns after
some procedure failure. But if the clocks (partial or all) have been
enabled previously, they would not be disabled in msdc_runtime_suspend,
since runtime PM is not yet enabled for this case.

That cause mmc related clocks always on during system suspend and block
suspend flow. Below log is from a SDCard issue of MT8196 chromebook, it
returns -ETIMEOUT while polling clock stable in the msdc_ungate_clock()
and probe failed, but the enabled clocks could not be disabled anyway.

[  129.059253] clk_chk_dev_pm_suspend()
[  129.350119] suspend warning: msdcpll is on
[  129.354494] [ck_msdc30_1_sel : enabled, 1, 1, 191999939,   ck_msdcpll_d2]
[  129.362787] [ck_msdcpll_d2   : enabled, 1, 1, 191999939,         msdcpll]
[  129.371041] [ck_msdc30_1_ck  : enabled, 1, 1, 191999939, ck_msdc30_1_sel]
[  129.379295] [msdcpll         : enabled, 1, 1, 383999878,          clk26m]

Add a new 'release_clk' label and reorder the error handle functions to
make sure the clocks be disabled after probe failure.

Fixes: ffaea6ebfe9c ("mmc: mtk-sd: Use readl_poll_timeout instead of open-coded polling")
Fixes: 7a2fa8eed936 ("mmc: mtk-sd: use devm_mmc_alloc_host")
Signed-off-by: Andy-ld Lu <andy-ld.lu@mediatek.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Add the relevant fixes tags.

---
 drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
index a2750a45c1b7..022526a1f754 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
@@ -3007,7 +3007,7 @@ static int msdc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ret = msdc_ungate_clock(host);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot ungate clocks!\n");
-		goto release_mem;
+		goto release_clk;
 	}
 	msdc_init_hw(host);
 
@@ -3017,14 +3017,14 @@ static int msdc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 					     GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!host->cq_host) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto release_mem;
+			goto release;
 		}
 		host->cq_host->caps |= CQHCI_TASK_DESC_SZ_128;
 		host->cq_host->mmio = host->base + 0x800;
 		host->cq_host->ops = &msdc_cmdq_ops;
 		ret = cqhci_init(host->cq_host, mmc, true);
 		if (ret)
-			goto release_mem;
+			goto release;
 		mmc->max_segs = 128;
 		/* cqhci 16bit length */
 		/* 0 size, means 65536 so we don't have to -1 here */
@@ -3064,9 +3064,10 @@ static int msdc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 end:
 	pm_runtime_disable(host->dev);
 release:
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
 	msdc_deinit_hw(host);
+release_clk:
 	msdc_gate_clock(host);
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
 release_mem:
 	if (host->dma.gpd)
 		dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev,
-- 
2.46.0
Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: mtk-sd: Fix error handle of probe function
Posted by Ulf Hansson 1 week, 4 days ago
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 13:12, Andy-ld Lu <andy-ld.lu@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> In the probe function, it goes to 'release_mem' label and returns after
> some procedure failure. But if the clocks (partial or all) have been
> enabled previously, they would not be disabled in msdc_runtime_suspend,
> since runtime PM is not yet enabled for this case.
>
> That cause mmc related clocks always on during system suspend and block
> suspend flow. Below log is from a SDCard issue of MT8196 chromebook, it
> returns -ETIMEOUT while polling clock stable in the msdc_ungate_clock()
> and probe failed, but the enabled clocks could not be disabled anyway.
>
> [  129.059253] clk_chk_dev_pm_suspend()
> [  129.350119] suspend warning: msdcpll is on
> [  129.354494] [ck_msdc30_1_sel : enabled, 1, 1, 191999939,   ck_msdcpll_d2]
> [  129.362787] [ck_msdcpll_d2   : enabled, 1, 1, 191999939,         msdcpll]
> [  129.371041] [ck_msdc30_1_ck  : enabled, 1, 1, 191999939, ck_msdc30_1_sel]
> [  129.379295] [msdcpll         : enabled, 1, 1, 383999878,          clk26m]
>
> Add a new 'release_clk' label and reorder the error handle functions to
> make sure the clocks be disabled after probe failure.
>
> Fixes: ffaea6ebfe9c ("mmc: mtk-sd: Use readl_poll_timeout instead of open-coded polling")
> Fixes: 7a2fa8eed936 ("mmc: mtk-sd: use devm_mmc_alloc_host")
> Signed-off-by: Andy-ld Lu <andy-ld.lu@mediatek.com>

This didn't apply on fixes the branch, but only on next. That said, I
have queued this up for next and added a stable tag.

Note that, this means that the fix needs to be backported manually,
but I leave that to you or someone else to take care of.

Thanks and kind regards
Uffe



> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add the relevant fixes tags.
>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> index a2750a45c1b7..022526a1f754 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> @@ -3007,7 +3007,7 @@ static int msdc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         ret = msdc_ungate_clock(host);
>         if (ret) {
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot ungate clocks!\n");
> -               goto release_mem;
> +               goto release_clk;
>         }
>         msdc_init_hw(host);
>
> @@ -3017,14 +3017,14 @@ static int msdc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                                              GFP_KERNEL);
>                 if (!host->cq_host) {
>                         ret = -ENOMEM;
> -                       goto release_mem;
> +                       goto release;
>                 }
>                 host->cq_host->caps |= CQHCI_TASK_DESC_SZ_128;
>                 host->cq_host->mmio = host->base + 0x800;
>                 host->cq_host->ops = &msdc_cmdq_ops;
>                 ret = cqhci_init(host->cq_host, mmc, true);
>                 if (ret)
> -                       goto release_mem;
> +                       goto release;
>                 mmc->max_segs = 128;
>                 /* cqhci 16bit length */
>                 /* 0 size, means 65536 so we don't have to -1 here */
> @@ -3064,9 +3064,10 @@ static int msdc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  end:
>         pm_runtime_disable(host->dev);
>  release:
> -       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>         msdc_deinit_hw(host);
> +release_clk:
>         msdc_gate_clock(host);
> +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>  release_mem:
>         if (host->dma.gpd)
>                 dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev,
> --
> 2.46.0
>
Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: mtk-sd: Fix error handle of probe function
Posted by AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2 weeks, 2 days ago
Il 07/11/24 13:11, Andy-ld Lu ha scritto:
> In the probe function, it goes to 'release_mem' label and returns after
> some procedure failure. But if the clocks (partial or all) have been
> enabled previously, they would not be disabled in msdc_runtime_suspend,
> since runtime PM is not yet enabled for this case.
> 
> That cause mmc related clocks always on during system suspend and block
> suspend flow. Below log is from a SDCard issue of MT8196 chromebook, it
> returns -ETIMEOUT while polling clock stable in the msdc_ungate_clock()
> and probe failed, but the enabled clocks could not be disabled anyway.
> 
> [  129.059253] clk_chk_dev_pm_suspend()
> [  129.350119] suspend warning: msdcpll is on
> [  129.354494] [ck_msdc30_1_sel : enabled, 1, 1, 191999939,   ck_msdcpll_d2]
> [  129.362787] [ck_msdcpll_d2   : enabled, 1, 1, 191999939,         msdcpll]
> [  129.371041] [ck_msdc30_1_ck  : enabled, 1, 1, 191999939, ck_msdc30_1_sel]
> [  129.379295] [msdcpll         : enabled, 1, 1, 383999878,          clk26m]
> 
> Add a new 'release_clk' label and reorder the error handle functions to
> make sure the clocks be disabled after probe failure.
> 
> Fixes: ffaea6ebfe9c ("mmc: mtk-sd: Use readl_poll_timeout instead of open-coded polling")
> Fixes: 7a2fa8eed936 ("mmc: mtk-sd: use devm_mmc_alloc_host")
> Signed-off-by: Andy-ld Lu <andy-ld.lu@mediatek.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>