[PATCH v3 7/9] vhost: Add new UAPI to support change to task mode

Cindy Lu posted 9 patches 2 weeks, 5 days ago
[PATCH v3 7/9] vhost: Add new UAPI to support change to task mode
Posted by Cindy Lu 2 weeks, 5 days ago
Add a new UAPI to enable setting the vhost device to task mode.
The userspace application can use VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER
to configure the mode if necessary.
This setting must be applied before VHOST_SET_OWNER, as the worker
will be created in the VHOST_SET_OWNER function

Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c      | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 include/uapi/linux/vhost.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index c17dc01febcc..70c793b63905 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -2274,8 +2274,9 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
 {
 	struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
 	u64 p;
-	long r;
+	long r = 0;
 	int i, fd;
+	bool inherit_owner;
 
 	/* If you are not the owner, you can become one */
 	if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
@@ -2332,6 +2333,18 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
 		if (ctx)
 			eventfd_ctx_put(ctx);
 		break;
+	case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER:
+		/*inherit_owner can only be modified before owner is set*/
+		if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))
+			break;
+
+		if (copy_from_user(&inherit_owner, argp,
+				   sizeof(inherit_owner))) {
+			r = -EFAULT;
+			break;
+		}
+		d->inherit_owner = inherit_owner;
+		break;
 	default:
 		r = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
 		break;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
index b95dd84eef2d..1e192038633d 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
@@ -235,4 +235,6 @@
  */
 #define VHOST_VDPA_GET_VRING_SIZE	_IOWR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x82,	\
 					      struct vhost_vring_state)
+
+#define VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x83, bool)
 #endif
-- 
2.45.0
Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] vhost: Add new UAPI to support change to task mode
Posted by Michael S. Tsirkin 2 weeks, 4 days ago
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 03:25:26PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> Add a new UAPI to enable setting the vhost device to task mode.
> The userspace application can use VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER
> to configure the mode if necessary.
> This setting must be applied before VHOST_SET_OWNER, as the worker
> will be created in the VHOST_SET_OWNER function
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.c      | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  include/uapi/linux/vhost.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index c17dc01febcc..70c793b63905 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -2274,8 +2274,9 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
>  {
>  	struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
>  	u64 p;
> -	long r;
> +	long r = 0;
>  	int i, fd;
> +	bool inherit_owner;
>  
>  	/* If you are not the owner, you can become one */
>  	if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
> @@ -2332,6 +2333,18 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
>  		if (ctx)
>  			eventfd_ctx_put(ctx);
>  		break;
> +	case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER:
> +		/*inherit_owner can only be modified before owner is set*/

bad coding style

> +		if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))
> +			break;

is this silently failing? should return EBUSY or something like this.

> +
> +		if (copy_from_user(&inherit_owner, argp,
> +				   sizeof(inherit_owner))) {

not good, 


> +			r = -EFAULT;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		d->inherit_owner = inherit_owner;




> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		r = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
>  		break;



This means any task can break out of jail
and steal root group system time by setting inherit_owner to 0
even if system is configured to inherit by default.

we need a modparam to block this.


> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> index b95dd84eef2d..1e192038633d 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> @@ -235,4 +235,6 @@
>   */
>  #define VHOST_VDPA_GET_VRING_SIZE	_IOWR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x82,	\
>  					      struct vhost_vring_state)
> +
> +#define VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x83, bool)

do not put bool in interfaces. something like u8 and validate it is 0 or
1.

>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.45.0
Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] vhost: Add new UAPI to support change to task mode
Posted by Michael S. Tsirkin 2 weeks, 4 days ago
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 03:25:26PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> index b95dd84eef2d..1e192038633d 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> @@ -235,4 +235,6 @@
>   */
>  #define VHOST_VDPA_GET_VRING_SIZE	_IOWR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x82,	\
>  					      struct vhost_vring_state)
> +
> +#define VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x83, bool)


set with no get is also not great.

>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.45.0
Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] vhost: Add new UAPI to support change to task mode
Posted by Stefano Garzarella 2 weeks, 5 days ago
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 03:25:26PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
>Add a new UAPI to enable setting the vhost device to task mode.
>The userspace application can use VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER
>to configure the mode if necessary.
>This setting must be applied before VHOST_SET_OWNER, as the worker
>will be created in the VHOST_SET_OWNER function
>
>Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
>---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c      | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> include/uapi/linux/vhost.h |  2 ++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>index c17dc01febcc..70c793b63905 100644
>--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>@@ -2274,8 +2274,9 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
> {
> 	struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
> 	u64 p;
>-	long r;
>+	long r = 0;

I don't know if something is missing in this patch, but I am confused:

`r` is set few lines below...

> 	int i, fd;
>+	bool inherit_owner;
>
> 	/* If you are not the owner, you can become one */
> 	if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
...

	/* You must be the owner to do anything else */
	r = vhost_dev_check_owner(d);
	if (r)
		goto done;

So, why we are now initializing it to 0?

>@@ -2332,6 +2333,18 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
> 		if (ctx)
> 			eventfd_ctx_put(ctx);
> 		break;
>+	case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER:
>+		/*inherit_owner can only be modified before owner is set*/
>+		if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))

And here, how this check can be false, if at the beginning of the
function we call vhost_dev_check_owner()?

Maybe your intention was to add this code before the
`vhost_dev_check_owner()` call, so this should explain why initialize
`r` to 0, but I'm not sure.

>+			break;

Should we return an error (e.g. -EPERM) in this case?

>+
>+		if (copy_from_user(&inherit_owner, argp,
>+				   sizeof(inherit_owner))) {
>+			r = -EFAULT;
>+			break;
>+		}
>+		d->inherit_owner = inherit_owner;
>+		break;
> 	default:
> 		r = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> 		break;
>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
>index b95dd84eef2d..1e192038633d 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
>@@ -235,4 +235,6 @@
>  */
> #define VHOST_VDPA_GET_VRING_SIZE	_IOWR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x82,	\
> 					      struct vhost_vring_state)
>+

Please add a documentation here, this is UAPI, so the user should
know what this ioctl does based on the parameter.

Thanks,
Stefano

>+#define VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x83, bool)
> #endif
>-- 
>2.45.0
>
Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] vhost: Add new UAPI to support change to task mode
Posted by Cindy Lu 2 weeks, 3 days ago
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 6:32 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 03:25:26PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> >Add a new UAPI to enable setting the vhost device to task mode.
> >The userspace application can use VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER
> >to configure the mode if necessary.
> >This setting must be applied before VHOST_SET_OWNER, as the worker
> >will be created in the VHOST_SET_OWNER function
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> >---
> > drivers/vhost/vhost.c      | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> > include/uapi/linux/vhost.h |  2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >index c17dc01febcc..70c793b63905 100644
> >--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >@@ -2274,8 +2274,9 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
> > {
> >       struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
> >       u64 p;
> >-      long r;
> >+      long r = 0;
>
> I don't know if something is missing in this patch, but I am confused:
>
> `r` is set few lines below...
>
> >       int i, fd;
> >+      bool inherit_owner;
> >
> >       /* If you are not the owner, you can become one */
> >       if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
> ...
>
>         /* You must be the owner to do anything else */
>         r = vhost_dev_check_owner(d);
>         if (r)
>                 goto done;
>
> So, why we are now initializing it to 0?
>
r = 0 mean return successfully here.
Therefore, in the case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER function, I don't
need to set it again and can simply return.
....
    if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))
       break;
.....
> >@@ -2332,6 +2333,18 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
> >               if (ctx)
> >                       eventfd_ctx_put(ctx);
> >               break;
> >+      case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER:
> >+              /*inherit_owner can only be modified before owner is set*/
> >+              if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))
>
> And here, how this check can be false, if at the beginning of the
> function we call vhost_dev_check_owner()?
>
> Maybe your intention was to add this code before the
> `vhost_dev_check_owner()` call, so this should explain why initialize
> `r` to 0, but I'm not sure.
>
Yes, in the function beginning, the code is
if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
r = vhost_dev_set_owner(d);
goto done;
}
if the ioctl is not VHOST_SET_OWNER,  then the  code will not run the
function vhost_dev_set_owner.
This ioctl is used by userspace applications, so we cannot be certain
of the type and sequence of their calls; therefore, I added this
check.

> >+                      break;
>
> Should we return an error (e.g. -EPERM) in this case?
>
sure,will add this back
thanks
Cindy
> >+
> >+              if (copy_from_user(&inherit_owner, argp,
> >+                                 sizeof(inherit_owner))) {
> >+                      r = -EFAULT;
> >+                      break;
> >+              }
> >+              d->inherit_owner = inherit_owner;
> >+              break;
> >       default:
> >               r = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> >               break;
> >diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> >index b95dd84eef2d..1e192038633d 100644
> >--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> >+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> >@@ -235,4 +235,6 @@
> >  */
> > #define VHOST_VDPA_GET_VRING_SIZE     _IOWR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x82,       \
> >                                             struct vhost_vring_state)
> >+
>
> Please add a documentation here, this is UAPI, so the user should
> know what this ioctl does based on the parameter.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
> >+#define VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x83, bool)
> > #endif
> >--
> >2.45.0
> >
>
Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] vhost: Add new UAPI to support change to task mode
Posted by Stefano Garzarella 2 weeks, 3 days ago
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 03:12:49PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 6:32 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 03:25:26PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
>> >Add a new UAPI to enable setting the vhost device to task mode.
>> >The userspace application can use VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER
>> >to configure the mode if necessary.
>> >This setting must be applied before VHOST_SET_OWNER, as the worker
>> >will be created in the VHOST_SET_OWNER function
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
>> >---
>> > drivers/vhost/vhost.c      | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> > include/uapi/linux/vhost.h |  2 ++
>> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> >index c17dc01febcc..70c793b63905 100644
>> >--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> >+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> >@@ -2274,8 +2274,9 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
>> > {
>> >       struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
>> >       u64 p;
>> >-      long r;
>> >+      long r = 0;
>>
>> I don't know if something is missing in this patch, but I am confused:
>>
>> `r` is set few lines below...
>>
>> >       int i, fd;
>> >+      bool inherit_owner;
>> >
>> >       /* If you are not the owner, you can become one */
>> >       if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
>> ...
>>
>>         /* You must be the owner to do anything else */
>>         r = vhost_dev_check_owner(d);
>>         if (r)
>>                 goto done;
>>
>> So, why we are now initializing it to 0?
>>
>r = 0 mean return successfully here.
>Therefore, in the case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER function, I don't
>need to set it again and can simply return.
>....
>    if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))
>       break;
>.....

Okay, but vhost_dev_check_owner() already set it to 0, so we can avoid 
that, no?

>> >@@ -2332,6 +2333,18 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
>> >               if (ctx)
>> >                       eventfd_ctx_put(ctx);
>> >               break;
>> >+      case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER:
>> >+              /*inherit_owner can only be modified before owner is set*/
>> >+              if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))
>>
>> And here, how this check can be false, if at the beginning of the
>> function we call vhost_dev_check_owner()?
>>
>> Maybe your intention was to add this code before the
>> `vhost_dev_check_owner()` call, so this should explain why initialize
>> `r` to 0, but I'm not sure.
>>
>Yes, in the function beginning, the code is
>if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
>r = vhost_dev_set_owner(d);
>goto done;
>}
>if the ioctl is not VHOST_SET_OWNER,  then the  code will not run the
>function vhost_dev_set_owner.

Sorry, I meant vhost_dev_check_owner(), not vhost_dev_set_owner().

I'll try to explain again.

After applying this series we have this code:

long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
{
	struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
	u64 p;
	long r = 0;
	int i, fd;
	bool inherit_owner;

	/* If you are not the owner, you can become one */
	if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
		r = vhost_dev_set_owner(d);
		goto done;
	}

	/* You must be the owner to do anything else */
	r = vhost_dev_check_owner(d);
	if (r)
		goto done;

	switch (ioctl) {
	...
     	case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER:
		/*inherit_owner can only be modified before owner is 
		 * set*/
		if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))
			break;

IIUC this check is always true, so we always call `break` because at
the beginning of this function we call vhost_dev_check_owner() which
if `dev->mm != current->mm` (so it can't be null I guess) jumps directly
into `done`, returning an error.

So I still don't understand in which condition we can run the code after
this check.

Thanks,
Stefano

		if (copy_from_user(&inherit_owner, argp,
				   sizeof(inherit_owner))) {
			r = -EFAULT;
			break;
		}
		d->inherit_owner = inherit_owner;
		break;


>This ioctl is used by userspace applications, so we cannot be certain
>of the type and sequence of their calls; therefore, I added this
>check.
>
>> >+                      break;
>>
>> Should we return an error (e.g. -EPERM) in this case?
>>
>sure,will add this back
>thanks
>Cindy
>> >+
>> >+              if (copy_from_user(&inherit_owner, argp,
>> >+                                 sizeof(inherit_owner))) {
>> >+                      r = -EFAULT;
>> >+                      break;
>> >+              }
>> >+              d->inherit_owner = inherit_owner;
>> >+              break;
>> >       default:
>> >               r = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
>> >               break;
>> >diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
>> >index b95dd84eef2d..1e192038633d 100644
>> >--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
>> >+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
>> >@@ -235,4 +235,6 @@
>> >  */
>> > #define VHOST_VDPA_GET_VRING_SIZE     _IOWR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x82,       \
>> >                                             struct vhost_vring_state)
>> >+
>>
>> Please add a documentation here, this is UAPI, so the user should
>> know what this ioctl does based on the parameter.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>>
>> >+#define VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x83, bool)
>> > #endif
>> >--
>> >2.45.0
>> >
>>
>

Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] vhost: Add new UAPI to support change to task mode
Posted by Cindy Lu 2 weeks, 3 days ago
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 6:03 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 03:12:49PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 6:32 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 03:25:26PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> >> >Add a new UAPI to enable setting the vhost device to task mode.
> >> >The userspace application can use VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER
> >> >to configure the mode if necessary.
> >> >This setting must be applied before VHOST_SET_OWNER, as the worker
> >> >will be created in the VHOST_SET_OWNER function
> >> >
> >> >Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> >> >---
> >> > drivers/vhost/vhost.c      | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> >> > include/uapi/linux/vhost.h |  2 ++
> >> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> >diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >> >index c17dc01febcc..70c793b63905 100644
> >> >--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >> >+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >> >@@ -2274,8 +2274,9 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
> >> > {
> >> >       struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
> >> >       u64 p;
> >> >-      long r;
> >> >+      long r = 0;
> >>
> >> I don't know if something is missing in this patch, but I am confused:
> >>
> >> `r` is set few lines below...
> >>
> >> >       int i, fd;
> >> >+      bool inherit_owner;
> >> >
> >> >       /* If you are not the owner, you can become one */
> >> >       if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
> >> ...
> >>
> >>         /* You must be the owner to do anything else */
> >>         r = vhost_dev_check_owner(d);
> >>         if (r)
> >>                 goto done;
> >>
> >> So, why we are now initializing it to 0?
> >>
> >r = 0 mean return successfully here.
> >Therefore, in the case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER function, I don't
> >need to set it again and can simply return.
> >....
> >    if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))
> >       break;
> >.....
>
> Okay, but vhost_dev_check_owner() already set it to 0, so we can avoid
> that, no?
>
> >> >@@ -2332,6 +2333,18 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
> >> >               if (ctx)
> >> >                       eventfd_ctx_put(ctx);
> >> >               break;
> >> >+      case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER:
> >> >+              /*inherit_owner can only be modified before owner is set*/
> >> >+              if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))
> >>
> >> And here, how this check can be false, if at the beginning of the
> >> function we call vhost_dev_check_owner()?
> >>
> >> Maybe your intention was to add this code before the
> >> `vhost_dev_check_owner()` call, so this should explain why initialize
> >> `r` to 0, but I'm not sure.
> >>
> >Yes, in the function beginning, the code is
> >if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
> >r = vhost_dev_set_owner(d);
> >goto done;
> >}
> >if the ioctl is not VHOST_SET_OWNER,  then the  code will not run the
> >function vhost_dev_set_owner.
>
> Sorry, I meant vhost_dev_check_owner(), not vhost_dev_set_owner().
>
> I'll try to explain again.
>
> After applying this series we have this code:
>
> long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
> {
>         struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
>         u64 p;
>         long r = 0;
>         int i, fd;
>         bool inherit_owner;
>
>         /* If you are not the owner, you can become one */
>         if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
>                 r = vhost_dev_set_owner(d);
>                 goto done;
>         }
>
>         /* You must be the owner to do anything else */
>         r = vhost_dev_check_owner(d);
>         if (r)
>                 goto done;
>
>         switch (ioctl) {
>         ...
>         case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER:
>                 /*inherit_owner can only be modified before owner is
>                  * set*/
>                 if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))
>                         break;
>
> IIUC this check is always true, so we always call `break` because at
> the beginning of this function we call vhost_dev_check_owner() which
> if `dev->mm != current->mm` (so it can't be null I guess) jumps directly
> into `done`, returning an error.
>
> So I still don't understand in which condition we can run the code after
> this check.
>
oh sorry I missed that check. I will move the new case back to the top
of function,
I didn't think it through before making this change; I just wanted to
clean up the code but forgot about the status.
Thanks
cindy
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
>                 if (copy_from_user(&inherit_owner, argp,
>                                    sizeof(inherit_owner))) {
>                         r = -EFAULT;
>                         break;
>                 }
>                 d->inherit_owner = inherit_owner;
>                 break;
>
>
> >This ioctl is used by userspace applications, so we cannot be certain
> >of the type and sequence of their calls; therefore, I added this
> >check.
> >
> >> >+                      break;
> >>
> >> Should we return an error (e.g. -EPERM) in this case?
> >>
> >sure,will add this back
> >thanks
> >Cindy
> >> >+
> >> >+              if (copy_from_user(&inherit_owner, argp,
> >> >+                                 sizeof(inherit_owner))) {
> >> >+                      r = -EFAULT;
> >> >+                      break;
> >> >+              }
> >> >+              d->inherit_owner = inherit_owner;
> >> >+              break;
> >> >       default:
> >> >               r = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> >> >               break;
> >> >diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> >> >index b95dd84eef2d..1e192038633d 100644
> >> >--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> >> >+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> >> >@@ -235,4 +235,6 @@
> >> >  */
> >> > #define VHOST_VDPA_GET_VRING_SIZE     _IOWR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x82,       \
> >> >                                             struct vhost_vring_state)
> >> >+
> >>
> >> Please add a documentation here, this is UAPI, so the user should
> >> know what this ioctl does based on the parameter.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Stefano
> >>
> >> >+#define VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x83, bool)
> >> > #endif
> >> >--
> >> >2.45.0
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] vhost: Add new UAPI to support change to task mode
Posted by Jason Wang 2 weeks, 5 days ago
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 3:28 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Add a new UAPI to enable setting the vhost device to task mode.
> The userspace application can use VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER
> to configure the mode if necessary.
> This setting must be applied before VHOST_SET_OWNER, as the worker
> will be created in the VHOST_SET_OWNER function
>
> Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.c      | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  include/uapi/linux/vhost.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index c17dc01febcc..70c793b63905 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -2274,8 +2274,9 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
>  {
>         struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
>         u64 p;
> -       long r;
> +       long r = 0;
>         int i, fd;
> +       bool inherit_owner;
>
>         /* If you are not the owner, you can become one */
>         if (ioctl == VHOST_SET_OWNER) {
> @@ -2332,6 +2333,18 @@ long vhost_dev_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *argp)
>                 if (ctx)
>                         eventfd_ctx_put(ctx);
>                 break;
> +       case VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER:
> +               /*inherit_owner can only be modified before owner is set*/
> +               if (vhost_dev_has_owner(d))
> +                       break;
> +
> +               if (copy_from_user(&inherit_owner, argp,
> +                                  sizeof(inherit_owner))) {
> +                       r = -EFAULT;
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +               d->inherit_owner = inherit_owner;
> +               break;

Is there any case that we need to switch from owner back to kthread?
If not I would choose a more simplified API that is just
VHOST_INHERIT_OWNER.

>         default:
>                 r = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
>                 break;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> index b95dd84eef2d..1e192038633d 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> @@ -235,4 +235,6 @@
>   */
>  #define VHOST_VDPA_GET_VRING_SIZE      _IOWR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x82,       \
>                                               struct vhost_vring_state)
> +
> +#define VHOST_SET_INHERIT_FROM_OWNER _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x83, bool)
>  #endif
> --
> 2.45.0

Thanks

>