[PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for non-boolean properties

Rob Herring (Arm) posted 1 patch 2 weeks, 5 days ago
drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c  | 6 +++---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c           | 2 +-
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c       | 2 +-
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c | 2 +-
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
[PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for non-boolean properties
Posted by Rob Herring (Arm) 2 weeks, 5 days ago
The use of of_property_read_bool() for non-boolean properties is
deprecated in favor of of_property_present() when testing for property
presence.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c  | 6 +++---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c           | 2 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c       | 2 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c | 2 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c
index d05c2c478e79..842a1e6cbfc4 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c
@@ -633,11 +633,11 @@ static int imx_pinctrl_parse_functions(struct device_node *np,
 static bool imx_pinctrl_dt_is_flat_functions(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, function_np) {
-		if (of_property_read_bool(function_np, "fsl,pins"))
+		if (of_property_present(function_np, "fsl,pins"))
 			return true;
 
 		for_each_child_of_node_scoped(function_np, pinctrl_np) {
-			if (of_property_read_bool(pinctrl_np, "fsl,pins"))
+			if (of_property_present(pinctrl_np, "fsl,pins"))
 				return false;
 		}
 	}
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ int imx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		if (IS_ERR(ipctl->base))
 			return PTR_ERR(ipctl->base);
 
-		if (of_property_read_bool(dev_np, "fsl,input-sel")) {
+		if (of_property_present(dev_np, "fsl,input-sel")) {
 			np = of_parse_phandle(dev_np, "fsl,input-sel", 0);
 			if (!np) {
 				dev_err(&pdev->dev, "iomuxc fsl,input-sel property not found\n");
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c
index f4256a918165..48f8aabf3bfa 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-xway.c
@@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@ static int pinmux_xway_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * files which don't set the "gpio-ranges" property or systems that
 	 * utilize ACPI the driver has to call gpiochip_add_pin_range().
 	 */
-	if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
+	if (!of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
 		/* finish with registering the gpio range in pinctrl */
 		xway_gpio_range.npins = xway_chip.ngpio;
 		xway_gpio_range.base = xway_chip.base;
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
index aeaf0d1958f5..ec913c2e200f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
@@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl)
 	 * files which don't set the "gpio-ranges" property or systems that
 	 * utilize ACPI the driver has to call gpiochip_add_pin_range().
 	 */
-	if (!of_property_read_bool(pctrl->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
+	if (!of_property_present(pctrl->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
 		ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&pctrl->chip,
 			dev_name(pctrl->dev), 0, 0, chip->ngpio);
 		if (ret) {
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
index d2dd66769aa8..33384f52f55a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
@@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static int pmic_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * files which don't set the "gpio-ranges" property or systems that
 	 * utilize ACPI the driver has to call gpiochip_add_pin_range().
 	 */
-	if (!of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
+	if (!of_property_present(dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
 		ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&state->chip, dev_name(dev), 0, 0,
 					     npins);
 		if (ret) {
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c
index 9cd5247ea574..87301a2445ac 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-ssbi-gpio.c
@@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static int pm8xxx_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * files which don't set the "gpio-ranges" property or systems that
 	 * utilize ACPI the driver has to call gpiochip_add_pin_range().
 	 */
-	if (!of_property_read_bool(pctrl->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
+	if (!of_property_present(pctrl->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
 		ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&pctrl->chip, dev_name(pctrl->dev),
 					     0, 0, pctrl->chip.ngpio);
 		if (ret) {
-- 
2.45.2
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for non-boolean properties
Posted by Linus Walleij 2 weeks, 2 days ago
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 8:44 PM Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> wrote:

> The use of of_property_read_bool() for non-boolean properties is
> deprecated in favor of of_property_present() when testing for property
> presence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>

Makes perfect sense.
Patch applied!

Yours,
Linus Walleij