[PATCH V3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62: use opp_efuse_table for opp-table syscon

Dhruva Gole posted 1 patch 2 weeks, 6 days ago
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi | 9 +++++++--
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625.dtsi       | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[PATCH V3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62: use opp_efuse_table for opp-table syscon
Posted by Dhruva Gole 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Add another entry in the wkup_conf for the syscon node, and then use
that for the syscon in opp-table.

Marking entire wkup_conf as "syscon", "simple-mfd" is wrong and needs to
be addressed similar to how other child-nodes in wkup_conf are implemented
in the same file.

Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
---

Since the driver fixes for ti-cpufreq.c have made it in -next [1],
The DT fixes for SK-AM62x can be supported with support for legacy
style DT as well. This has been tested on SK-AM62x [2]

[2] https://gist.github.com/DhruvaG2000/40b80cc04a9ac90c86445d6e67ece4cb
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c?id=1724ae88efcbcd0daeb203ffeb4a2c0e59f2ddf7

Changelog:
v3:
- Update syscon@43000000 to say bus@...
- Validated that these changes don't break U-Boot:
https://gist.github.com/DhruvaG2000/2833b895dc79d5ce16265ecf15310add
- Link to v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241030044553.3225383-1-d-gole@ti.com/

v2:
- Deleted PATCH to Make the AM625 efuse_offset 0, because with [1] we no
  longer break backward compatibility and hence need to preserve the old
  offset.
- Link to v1:
  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240902093222.2828345-3-d-gole@ti.com/

---

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi | 9 +++++++--
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625.dtsi       | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi
index e0afafd532a5..9b8a1f85aa15 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@
 #include <dt-bindings/bus/ti-sysc.h>
 
 &cbass_wakeup {
-	wkup_conf: syscon@43000000 {
+	wkup_conf: bus@43000000 {
 		bootph-all;
-		compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd";
+		compatible = "simple-bus";
 		reg = <0x00 0x43000000 0x00 0x20000>;
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <1>;
@@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ chipid: chipid@14 {
 			reg = <0x14 0x4>;
 		};
 
+		opp_efuse_table: syscon@18 {
+			compatible = "ti,am62-opp-efuse-table", "syscon";
+			reg = <0x18 0x4>;
+		};
+
 		cpsw_mac_syscon: ethernet-mac-syscon@200 {
 			compatible = "ti,am62p-cpsw-mac-efuse", "syscon";
 			reg = <0x200 0x8>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625.dtsi
index c3d1db47dc9f..c249883a8a8d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625.dtsi
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ cpu3: cpu@3 {
 	a53_opp_table: opp-table {
 		compatible = "operating-points-v2-ti-cpu";
 		opp-shared;
-		syscon = <&wkup_conf>;
+		syscon = <&opp_efuse_table>;
 
 		opp-200000000 {
 			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <200000000>;

base-commit: dec9255a128e19c5fcc3bdb18175d78094cc624d
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH V3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62: use opp_efuse_table for opp-table syscon
Posted by Vignesh Raghavendra 2 weeks, 5 days ago
Hi Dhruva Gole,

On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 12:07:08 +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> Add another entry in the wkup_conf for the syscon node, and then use
> that for the syscon in opp-table.
> 
> Marking entire wkup_conf as "syscon", "simple-mfd" is wrong and needs to
> be addressed similar to how other child-nodes in wkup_conf are implemented
> in the same file.
> 
> [...]

I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-dts-next on [1].
Thank you!

[1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62: use opp_efuse_table for opp-table syscon
      commit: 767b6a0d0900c951e8b42306bd636268481a97ae

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git
--
Vignesh