drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Per PCI Firmware Specification Revision 3.3 Table 4-7 _DSM Definitions
for PCI. Preserve PCI Boot Configuration Initial Revision ID is 2. But
the code is 1.
Signed-off-by: Zhou Shengqing <zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com>
---
drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
index af370628e583..7a4cad0c1f00 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ bool pci_acpi_preserve_config(struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge)
*/
obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(ACPI_HANDLE(&host_bridge->dev),
&pci_acpi_dsm_guid,
- 1, DSM_PCI_PRESERVE_BOOT_CONFIG,
+ 2, DSM_PCI_PRESERVE_BOOT_CONFIG,
NULL, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER);
if (obj && obj->integer.value == 0)
return true;
--
2.39.2
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 7:14 AM Zhou Shengqing <zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com> wrote: > > Per PCI Firmware Specification Revision 3.3 Table 4-7 _DSM Definitions > for PCI. Preserve PCI Boot Configuration Initial Revision ID is 2. But > the code is 1. > > Signed-off-by: Zhou Shengqing <zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com> I think there should be a Fixes tag? > --- > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c > index af370628e583..7a4cad0c1f00 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c > @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ bool pci_acpi_preserve_config(struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge) > */ > obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(ACPI_HANDLE(&host_bridge->dev), > &pci_acpi_dsm_guid, > - 1, DSM_PCI_PRESERVE_BOOT_CONFIG, > + 2, DSM_PCI_PRESERVE_BOOT_CONFIG, > NULL, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER); > if (obj && obj->integer.value == 0) > return true; > -- > 2.39.2 >
> > > > Per PCI Firmware Specification Revision 3.3 Table 4-7 _DSM Definitions > > for PCI. Preserve PCI Boot Configuration Initial Revision ID is 2. But > > the code is 1. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhou Shengqing <zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com> > > I think there should be a Fixes tag? I found this bug while reviewing the UEFI firmware code. I haven't submitted this bug to Bugzilla, and I couldn't find it in Bugzilla either. So there is no fixes tag. Do you mean I should submit the bug to Bugzilla first? I am a newcomer, thank you for your patience.
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.