In order to produce a generic kernel, a user can select
CONFIG_COMBO_SPINLOCKS which will fallback at runtime to the ticket
spinlock implementation if Zabha or Ziccrse are not present.
Note that we can't use alternatives here because the discovery of
extensions is done too late and we need to start with the qspinlock
implementation because the ticket spinlock implementation would pollute
the spinlock value, so let's use static keys.
This is largely based on Guo's work and Leonardo reviews at [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20231225125847.2778638-1-guoren@kernel.org/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
---
.../locking/queued-spinlocks/arch-support.txt | 2 +-
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 34 ++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild | 4 +-
arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 37 +++++++++++++++
include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h | 2 +
include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h | 2 +
7 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
diff --git a/Documentation/features/locking/queued-spinlocks/arch-support.txt b/Documentation/features/locking/queued-spinlocks/arch-support.txt
index 22f2990392ff..cf26042480e2 100644
--- a/Documentation/features/locking/queued-spinlocks/arch-support.txt
+++ b/Documentation/features/locking/queued-spinlocks/arch-support.txt
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
| openrisc: | ok |
| parisc: | TODO |
| powerpc: | ok |
- | riscv: | TODO |
+ | riscv: | ok |
| s390: | TODO |
| sh: | TODO |
| sparc: | ok |
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index 093ee6537331..f5698ecc5ccc 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ config RISCV
select ARCH_WANT_OPTIMIZE_HUGETLB_VMEMMAP
select ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR
select ARCH_WANTS_THP_SWAP if HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
+ select ARCH_WEAK_RELEASE_ACQUIRE if ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
select BINFMT_FLAT_NO_DATA_START_OFFSET if !MMU
select BUILDTIME_TABLE_SORT if MMU
select CLINT_TIMER if RISCV_M_MODE
@@ -507,6 +508,39 @@ config NODES_SHIFT
Specify the maximum number of NUMA Nodes available on the target
system. Increases memory reserved to accommodate various tables.
+choice
+ prompt "RISC-V spinlock type"
+ default RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
+
+config RISCV_TICKET_SPINLOCKS
+ bool "Using ticket spinlock"
+
+config RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
+ bool "Using queued spinlock"
+ depends on SMP && MMU && NONPORTABLE
+ select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
+ help
+ The queued spinlock implementation requires the forward progress
+ guarantee of cmpxchg()/xchg() atomic operations: CAS with Zabha or
+ LR/SC with Ziccrse provide such guarantee.
+
+ Select this if and only if Zabha or Ziccrse is available on your
+ platform, RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS must not be selected for platforms
+ without one of those extensions.
+
+ If unsure, select RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS, which will use qspinlocks
+ when supported and otherwise ticket spinlocks.
+
+config RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
+ bool "Using combo spinlock"
+ depends on SMP && MMU
+ select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
+ help
+ Embed both queued spinlock and ticket lock so that the spinlock
+ implementation can be chosen at runtime.
+
+endchoice
+
config RISCV_ALTERNATIVE
bool
depends on !XIP_KERNEL
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild
index 1461af12da6e..de13d5a234f8 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild
@@ -6,10 +6,12 @@ generic-y += early_ioremap.h
generic-y += flat.h
generic-y += kvm_para.h
generic-y += mmzone.h
+generic-y += mcs_spinlock.h
generic-y += parport.h
-generic-y += spinlock.h
generic-y += spinlock_types.h
+generic-y += ticket_spinlock.h
generic-y += qrwlock.h
generic-y += qrwlock_types.h
+generic-y += qspinlock.h
generic-y += user.h
generic-y += vmlinux.lds.h
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e5121b89acea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H
+#define __ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS
+#define _Q_PENDING_LOOPS (1 << 9)
+
+#define __no_arch_spinlock_redefine
+#include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
+#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
+#include <asm/jump_label.h>
+
+/*
+ * TODO: Use an alternative instead of a static key when we are able to parse
+ * the extensions string earlier in the boot process.
+ */
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
+
+#define SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(op, type, type_lock) \
+static __always_inline type arch_spin_##op(type_lock lock) \
+{ \
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&qspinlock_key)) \
+ return queued_spin_##op(lock); \
+ return ticket_spin_##op(lock); \
+}
+
+SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(lock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
+SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(unlock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
+SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_locked, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
+SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_contended, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
+SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(trylock, bool, arch_spinlock_t *)
+SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(value_unlocked, int, arch_spinlock_t)
+
+#elif defined(CONFIG_RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS)
+
+#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
+
+#else
+
+#include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
+
+#endif
+
+#include <asm/qrwlock.h>
+
+#endif /* __ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index a2cde65b69e9..438e4f6ad2ad 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -244,6 +244,42 @@ static void __init parse_dtb(void)
#endif
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS)
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(qspinlock_key);
+#endif
+
+static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
+{
+ char *using_ext = NULL;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_TICKET_SPINLOCKS)) {
+ pr_info("Ticket spinlock: enabled\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZABHA) &&
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZACAS) &&
+ riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZABHA) &&
+ riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZACAS)) {
+ using_ext = "using Zabha";
+ } else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICCRSE)) {
+ using_ext = "using Ziccrse";
+ }
+#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS)
+ else {
+ static_branch_disable(&qspinlock_key);
+ pr_info("Ticket spinlock: enabled\n");
+ return;
+ }
+#endif
+
+ if (!using_ext)
+ pr_err("Queued spinlock without Zabha or Ziccrse");
+ else
+ pr_info("Queued spinlock %s: enabled\n", using_ext);
+}
+
extern void __init init_rt_signal_env(void);
void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
@@ -297,6 +333,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
riscv_set_dma_cache_alignment();
riscv_user_isa_enable();
+ riscv_spinlock_init();
}
bool arch_cpu_is_hotpluggable(int cpu)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
index 0655aa5b57b2..bf47cca2c375 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static __always_inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
}
#endif
+#ifndef __no_arch_spinlock_redefine
/*
* Remapping spinlock architecture specific functions to the corresponding
* queued spinlock functions.
@@ -146,5 +147,6 @@ static __always_inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
#define arch_spin_lock(l) queued_spin_lock(l)
#define arch_spin_trylock(l) queued_spin_trylock(l)
#define arch_spin_unlock(l) queued_spin_unlock(l)
+#endif
#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_QSPINLOCK_H */
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h
index cfcff22b37b3..325779970d8a 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static __always_inline int ticket_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
return (s16)((val >> 16) - (val & 0xffff)) > 1;
}
+#ifndef __no_arch_spinlock_redefine
/*
* Remapping spinlock architecture specific functions to the corresponding
* ticket spinlock functions.
@@ -99,5 +100,6 @@ static __always_inline int ticket_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
#define arch_spin_lock(l) ticket_spin_lock(l)
#define arch_spin_trylock(l) ticket_spin_trylock(l)
#define arch_spin_unlock(l) ticket_spin_unlock(l)
+#endif
#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H */
--
2.39.2On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 03:51:53PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> In order to produce a generic kernel, a user can select
> CONFIG_COMBO_SPINLOCKS which will fallback at runtime to the ticket
> spinlock implementation if Zabha or Ziccrse are not present.
>
> Note that we can't use alternatives here because the discovery of
> extensions is done too late and we need to start with the qspinlock
> implementation because the ticket spinlock implementation would pollute
> the spinlock value, so let's use static keys.
I think the static key toggling takes a mutex (jump_label_lock()) which
can take a spinlock (lock->wait_lock) internally, so I don't grok how
this works:
> +static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
> +{
> + char *using_ext = NULL;
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_TICKET_SPINLOCKS)) {
> + pr_info("Ticket spinlock: enabled\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZABHA) &&
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZACAS) &&
> + riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZABHA) &&
> + riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZACAS)) {
> + using_ext = "using Zabha";
> + } else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICCRSE)) {
> + using_ext = "using Ziccrse";
> + }
> +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS)
> + else {
> + static_branch_disable(&qspinlock_key);
> + pr_info("Ticket spinlock: enabled\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +#endif
i.e. we've potentially already used the qspinlock at this point.
Will
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 12:43 AM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 03:51:53PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > In order to produce a generic kernel, a user can select
> > CONFIG_COMBO_SPINLOCKS which will fallback at runtime to the ticket
> > spinlock implementation if Zabha or Ziccrse are not present.
> >
> > Note that we can't use alternatives here because the discovery of
> > extensions is done too late and we need to start with the qspinlock
> > implementation because the ticket spinlock implementation would pollute
> > the spinlock value, so let's use static keys.
>
> I think the static key toggling takes a mutex (jump_label_lock()) which
> can take a spinlock (lock->wait_lock) internally, so I don't grok how
> this works:
>
> > +static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
> > +{
> > + char *using_ext = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_TICKET_SPINLOCKS)) {
> > + pr_info("Ticket spinlock: enabled\n");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZABHA) &&
> > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZACAS) &&
> > + riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZABHA) &&
> > + riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZACAS)) {
> > + using_ext = "using Zabha";
> > + } else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICCRSE)) {
> > + using_ext = "using Ziccrse";
> > + }
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS)
> > + else {
> > + static_branch_disable(&qspinlock_key);
> > + pr_info("Ticket spinlock: enabled\n");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +#endif
>
> i.e. we've potentially already used the qspinlock at this point.
Yes, I've used qspinlock here. But riscv_spinlock_init is called with
irq_disabled and smp_off. That means this qspinlock only performs a
test-set lock behavior by qspinlock fast-path.
The qspinlock is a clean implementation. After qspin_unlock, the lock
value remains at zero, but the ticket lock makes the value dirty. So
we use Qspinlock at first or change it to ticket-lock before irq & smp
up.
>
> Will
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 09:49:15AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 12:43 AM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 03:51:53PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > > In order to produce a generic kernel, a user can select
> > > CONFIG_COMBO_SPINLOCKS which will fallback at runtime to the ticket
> > > spinlock implementation if Zabha or Ziccrse are not present.
> > >
> > > Note that we can't use alternatives here because the discovery of
> > > extensions is done too late and we need to start with the qspinlock
> > > implementation because the ticket spinlock implementation would pollute
> > > the spinlock value, so let's use static keys.
> >
> > I think the static key toggling takes a mutex (jump_label_lock()) which
> > can take a spinlock (lock->wait_lock) internally, so I don't grok how
> > this works:
> >
> > > +static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > + char *using_ext = NULL;
> > > +
> > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_TICKET_SPINLOCKS)) {
> > > + pr_info("Ticket spinlock: enabled\n");
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZABHA) &&
> > > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZACAS) &&
> > > + riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZABHA) &&
> > > + riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZACAS)) {
> > > + using_ext = "using Zabha";
> > > + } else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICCRSE)) {
> > > + using_ext = "using Ziccrse";
> > > + }
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS)
> > > + else {
> > > + static_branch_disable(&qspinlock_key);
> > > + pr_info("Ticket spinlock: enabled\n");
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +#endif
> >
> > i.e. we've potentially already used the qspinlock at this point.
> Yes, I've used qspinlock here. But riscv_spinlock_init is called with
> irq_disabled and smp_off. That means this qspinlock only performs a
> test-set lock behavior by qspinlock fast-path.
That's... horrendous.
Will
Hi Alexandre,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on arnd-asm-generic/master]
[also build test WARNING on robh/for-next tip/locking/core linus/master v6.12-rc6]
[cannot apply to next-20241101]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexandre-Ghiti/riscv-Move-cpufeature-h-macros-into-their-own-header/20241103-230614
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241103145153.105097-14-alexghiti%40rivosinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH v6 13/13] riscv: Add qspinlock support
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411041609.gxjI2dsw-lkp@intel.com/
includecheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h: asm/ticket_spinlock.h is included more than once.
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h: asm/qspinlock.h is included more than once.
vim +10 arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
8
9 #define __no_arch_spinlock_redefine
> 10 #include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
11 #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
12 #include <asm/jump_label.h>
13
14 /*
15 * TODO: Use an alternative instead of a static key when we are able to parse
16 * the extensions string earlier in the boot process.
17 */
18 DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
19
20 #define SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(op, type, type_lock) \
21 static __always_inline type arch_spin_##op(type_lock lock) \
22 { \
23 if (static_branch_unlikely(&qspinlock_key)) \
24 return queued_spin_##op(lock); \
25 return ticket_spin_##op(lock); \
26 }
27
28 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(lock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
29 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(unlock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
30 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_locked, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
31 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_contended, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
32 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(trylock, bool, arch_spinlock_t *)
33 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(value_unlocked, int, arch_spinlock_t)
34
35 #elif defined(CONFIG_RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS)
36
37 #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
38
39 #else
40
> 41 #include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
42
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 10:05 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on arnd-asm-generic/master]
> [also build test WARNING on robh/for-next tip/locking/core linus/master v6.12-rc6]
> [cannot apply to next-20241101]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexandre-Ghiti/riscv-Move-cpufeature-h-macros-into-their-own-header/20241103-230614
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git master
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241103145153.105097-14-alexghiti%40rivosinc.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v6 13/13] riscv: Add qspinlock support
> compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411041609.gxjI2dsw-lkp@intel.com/
>
> includecheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h: asm/ticket_spinlock.h is included more than once.
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h: asm/qspinlock.h is included more than once.
Yes but that's in a #ifdef/#elif#else clause so nothing to do here!
>
> vim +10 arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
>
> 8
> 9 #define __no_arch_spinlock_redefine
> > 10 #include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
> 11 #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> 12 #include <asm/jump_label.h>
> 13
> 14 /*
> 15 * TODO: Use an alternative instead of a static key when we are able to parse
> 16 * the extensions string earlier in the boot process.
> 17 */
> 18 DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
> 19
> 20 #define SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(op, type, type_lock) \
> 21 static __always_inline type arch_spin_##op(type_lock lock) \
> 22 { \
> 23 if (static_branch_unlikely(&qspinlock_key)) \
> 24 return queued_spin_##op(lock); \
> 25 return ticket_spin_##op(lock); \
> 26 }
> 27
> 28 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(lock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
> 29 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(unlock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
> 30 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_locked, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
> 31 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_contended, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
> 32 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(trylock, bool, arch_spinlock_t *)
> 33 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(value_unlocked, int, arch_spinlock_t)
> 34
> 35 #elif defined(CONFIG_RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS)
> 36
> 37 #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> 38
> 39 #else
> 40
> > 41 #include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
> 42
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:09:07AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 10:05 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on arnd-asm-generic/master]
> > [also build test WARNING on robh/for-next tip/locking/core linus/master v6.12-rc6]
> > [cannot apply to next-20241101]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >
> > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexandre-Ghiti/riscv-Move-cpufeature-h-macros-into-their-own-header/20241103-230614
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git master
> > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241103145153.105097-14-alexghiti%40rivosinc.com
> > patch subject: [PATCH v6 13/13] riscv: Add qspinlock support
> > compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
> >
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411041609.gxjI2dsw-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > includecheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> > >> arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h: asm/ticket_spinlock.h is included more than once.
> > >> arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h: asm/qspinlock.h is included more than once.
>
> Yes but that's in a #ifdef/#elif#else clause so nothing to do here!
Thanks for the info, we will fix the bot. Sorry for the false positive report.
>
> >
> > vim +10 arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> >
> > 8
> > 9 #define __no_arch_spinlock_redefine
> > > 10 #include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
> > 11 #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> > 12 #include <asm/jump_label.h>
> > 13
> > 14 /*
> > 15 * TODO: Use an alternative instead of a static key when we are able to parse
> > 16 * the extensions string earlier in the boot process.
> > 17 */
> > 18 DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
> > 19
> > 20 #define SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(op, type, type_lock) \
> > 21 static __always_inline type arch_spin_##op(type_lock lock) \
> > 22 { \
> > 23 if (static_branch_unlikely(&qspinlock_key)) \
> > 24 return queued_spin_##op(lock); \
> > 25 return ticket_spin_##op(lock); \
> > 26 }
> > 27
> > 28 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(lock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
> > 29 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(unlock, void, arch_spinlock_t *)
> > 30 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_locked, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
> > 31 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(is_contended, int, arch_spinlock_t *)
> > 32 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(trylock, bool, arch_spinlock_t *)
> > 33 SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(value_unlocked, int, arch_spinlock_t)
> > 34
> > 35 #elif defined(CONFIG_RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS)
> > 36
> > 37 #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> > 38
> > 39 #else
> > 40
> > > 41 #include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
> > 42
> >
> > --
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.