Optional default-brightness property specifies brightness value to be
used if default LED state is on.
Signed-off-by: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml
index 113b7c218303..61b97e8bc36d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml
@@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ patternProperties:
Maximum brightness possible for the LED
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
+ default-brightness:
+ description:
+ Brightness to be set if LED's default state is on. Used only during
+ initialization. If the option is not set then max brightness is used.
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
+
required:
- pwms
- max-brightness
--
2.25.1
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 06:48:43PM +0300, George Stark wrote: > Optional default-brightness property specifies brightness value to be > used if default LED state is on. > > Signed-off-by: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > <form letter> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they apply. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. </form letter> Best regards, Krzysztof
Hello Krzysztof, Rob Thanks for noticing it, missed the tag not by purpose, sorry about it. Sure I'll add the tag to v3 if v3 happens. On 11/2/24 16:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 06:48:43PM +0300, George Stark wrote: >> Optional default-brightness property specifies brightness value to be >> used if default LED state is on. >> >> Signed-off-by: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml | 6 ++++++ >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >> > > <form letter> > This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > > It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. > > If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add > Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions, under > or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when provided > in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help > here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. > The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version > they apply. > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. > </form letter> > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > -- Best regards George
On Sun, 03 Nov 2024, George Stark wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, Rob > > Thanks for noticing it, missed the tag not by purpose, sorry about it. > Sure I'll add the tag to v3 if v3 happens. Please reply directly under the text you're referring to. Top-posting is not allowed. Please submit a v2 [RESEND] complete with the missing tags. > On 11/2/24 16:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 06:48:43PM +0300, George Stark wrote: > > > Optional default-brightness property specifies brightness value to be > > > used if default LED state is on. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml | 6 ++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > > > > <form letter> > > This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > > > > It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. > > > > If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add > > Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions, under > > or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when provided > > in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help > > here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. > > The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version > > they apply. > > > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 > > > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. > > </form letter> > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > > > -- > Best regards > George -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.