kernel/bpf/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The operation msk |= ~0ULL contains a redundant bit-wise or operation
since all the bits are going to be set to 1, so replace this with
an assignment since this is more optimal and probably clearer too.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
index 9aaf5124648b..fea07e12601f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static int bpf_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
str = param->string;
while ((p = strsep(&str, ":"))) {
if (strcmp(p, "any") == 0) {
- msk |= ~0ULL;
+ msk = ~0ULL;
} else if (find_btf_enum_const(info.btf, enum_t, enum_pfx, p, &val)) {
msk |= 1ULL << val;
} else {
--
2.39.5
On 24/10/31 01:07PM, Colin Ian King wrote: > The operation msk |= ~0ULL contains a redundant bit-wise or operation > since all the bits are going to be set to 1, so replace this with > an assignment since this is more optimal and probably clearer too. > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> > --- > kernel/bpf/inode.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c > index 9aaf5124648b..fea07e12601f 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c > @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static int bpf_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param) > str = param->string; > while ((p = strsep(&str, ":"))) { > if (strcmp(p, "any") == 0) { > - msk |= ~0ULL; > + msk = ~0ULL; > } else if (find_btf_enum_const(info.btf, enum_t, enum_pfx, p, &val)) { > msk |= 1ULL << val; > } else { > -- > 2.39.5 The patch subject contains a typo ("assignmen" should be "assignment"), but maybe this can just be fixed on apply .. Cheers, Chris
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:07 AM Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> wrote: > > The operation msk |= ~0ULL contains a redundant bit-wise or operation > since all the bits are going to be set to 1, so replace this with > an assignment since this is more optimal and probably clearer too. > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> > --- > kernel/bpf/inode.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c > index 9aaf5124648b..fea07e12601f 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c > @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static int bpf_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param) > str = param->string; > while ((p = strsep(&str, ":"))) { > if (strcmp(p, "any") == 0) { > - msk |= ~0ULL; > + msk = ~0ULL; This was done for consistency with the other branch. Is there anything wrong with this code? Doesn't seem so, so I'd like to keep it as is. pw-bot: cr > } else if (find_btf_enum_const(info.btf, enum_t, enum_pfx, p, &val)) { > msk |= 1ULL << val; > } else { > -- > 2.39.5 >
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.