kernel/bpf/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The operation msk |= ~0ULL contains a redundant bit-wise or operation
since all the bits are going to be set to 1, so replace this with
an assignment since this is more optimal and probably clearer too.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
index 9aaf5124648b..fea07e12601f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static int bpf_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
str = param->string;
while ((p = strsep(&str, ":"))) {
if (strcmp(p, "any") == 0) {
- msk |= ~0ULL;
+ msk = ~0ULL;
} else if (find_btf_enum_const(info.btf, enum_t, enum_pfx, p, &val)) {
msk |= 1ULL << val;
} else {
--
2.39.5
On 24/10/31 01:07PM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> The operation msk |= ~0ULL contains a redundant bit-wise or operation
> since all the bits are going to be set to 1, so replace this with
> an assignment since this is more optimal and probably clearer too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> index 9aaf5124648b..fea07e12601f 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static int bpf_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
> str = param->string;
> while ((p = strsep(&str, ":"))) {
> if (strcmp(p, "any") == 0) {
> - msk |= ~0ULL;
> + msk = ~0ULL;
> } else if (find_btf_enum_const(info.btf, enum_t, enum_pfx, p, &val)) {
> msk |= 1ULL << val;
> } else {
> --
> 2.39.5
The patch subject contains a typo ("assignmen" should be "assignment"),
but maybe this can just be fixed on apply ..
Cheers,
Chris
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:07 AM Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The operation msk |= ~0ULL contains a redundant bit-wise or operation
> since all the bits are going to be set to 1, so replace this with
> an assignment since this is more optimal and probably clearer too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> index 9aaf5124648b..fea07e12601f 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static int bpf_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
> str = param->string;
> while ((p = strsep(&str, ":"))) {
> if (strcmp(p, "any") == 0) {
> - msk |= ~0ULL;
> + msk = ~0ULL;
This was done for consistency with the other branch. Is there anything
wrong with this code? Doesn't seem so, so I'd like to keep it as is.
pw-bot: cr
> } else if (find_btf_enum_const(info.btf, enum_t, enum_pfx, p, &val)) {
> msk |= 1ULL << val;
> } else {
> --
> 2.39.5
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.