[PATCH RESEND 5/7] md/raid1: don't wait for Faulty rdev in wait_blocked_rdev()

Yu Kuai posted 7 patches 3 weeks, 3 days ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH RESEND 5/7] md/raid1: don't wait for Faulty rdev in wait_blocked_rdev()
Posted by Yu Kuai 3 weeks, 3 days ago
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>

Faulty rdev should never be accessed anymore, hence there is no point to
wait for bad block to be acknowledged in this case while handling write
request.

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid1.c | 17 ++++-------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
index 1679c1e9b3d5..cd3e94dceabc 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -1425,25 +1425,16 @@ static bool wait_blocked_rdev(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
 		if (!rdev)
 			continue;
 
-		if (test_bit(Blocked, &rdev->flags)) {
-			if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)
-				return false;
-
-			mddev_add_trace_msg(rdev->mddev, "raid1 wait rdev %d blocked",
-					    rdev->raid_disk);
-			atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
-			md_wait_for_blocked_rdev(rdev, rdev->mddev);
-			goto retry;
-		}
-
 		/* don't write here until the bad block is acknowledged */
 		if (test_bit(WriteErrorSeen, &rdev->flags) &&
 		    rdev_has_badblock(rdev, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
-				      bio_sectors(bio)) < 0) {
+				      bio_sectors(bio)) < 0)
+			set_bit(BlockedBadBlocks, &rdev->flags);
+
+		if (rdev_blocked(rdev)) {
 			if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)
 				return false;
 
-			set_bit(BlockedBadBlocks, &rdev->flags);
 			mddev_add_trace_msg(rdev->mddev, "raid1 wait rdev %d blocked",
 					    rdev->raid_disk);
 			atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
-- 
2.39.2