Even if it's not critical, the avoidance of checking the error code
from devm_mutex_init() call today diminishes the point of using devm
variant of it. Tomorrow it may even leak something. Add the missed
check.
Fixes: c46a74ff05c0 ("gpio: add support for FTDI's MPSSE as GPIO")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-mpsse.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpsse.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpsse.c
index 3ab6651d2226..8fba0779ae17 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpsse.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mpsse.c
@@ -430,8 +430,13 @@ static int gpio_mpsse_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
if (err)
return err;
- devm_mutex_init(dev, &priv->io_mutex);
- devm_mutex_init(dev, &priv->irq_mutex);
+ err = devm_mutex_init(dev, &priv->io_mutex);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &priv->irq_mutex);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
priv->gpio.label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL,
"gpio-mpsse.%d.%d",
--
2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac
Hello Andy! On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Even if it's not critical, the avoidance of checking the error code > from devm_mutex_init() call today diminishes the point of using devm > variant of it. Tomorrow it may even leak something. Add the missed > check. Totally missed this... Thanks! > @@ -430,8 +430,13 @@ static int gpio_mpsse_probe(struct usb_interface *interface, > if (err) > return err; > > - devm_mutex_init(dev, &priv->io_mutex); > - devm_mutex_init(dev, &priv->irq_mutex); > + err = devm_mutex_init(dev, &priv->io_mutex); > + if (err) > + return err; > + > + ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &priv->irq_mutex); I think this should be `err = ` Other than that, it looks good to me (I doubt you need this, but just in case): Reviewed-by: Mary Strodl <mstrodl@csh.rit.edu> Thanks!
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 01:12:01PM -0400, Mary Strodl wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > + err = devm_mutex_init(dev, &priv->io_mutex); > > + if (err) > > + return err; > > + > > + ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &priv->irq_mutex); > > I think this should be `err = ` Oh, I haven't compiled that for sure :-) > Other than that, it looks good to me (I doubt you need this, but just in case): > > Reviewed-by: Mary Strodl <mstrodl@csh.rit.edu> Thanks, I will fix that, I dunno how I missed that because I carefully read the code before adding the checks. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 07:33:17PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Thanks, I will fix that, I dunno how I missed that because I carefully read > the code before adding the checks. Proof that it happens to the best of us :) Thanks again!
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.