[PATCH v4 16/16] net: stmmac: dwmac-s32: Read PTP clock rate when ready

Jan Petrous via B4 Relay posted 16 patches 3 weeks, 6 days ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v4 16/16] net: stmmac: dwmac-s32: Read PTP clock rate when ready
Posted by Jan Petrous via B4 Relay 3 weeks, 6 days ago
From: "Jan Petrous (OSS)" <jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com>

The PTP clock is read by stmmac_platform during DT parse.
On S32G/R the clock is not ready and returns 0. Postpone
reading of the clock on PTP init.

Co-developed-by: Andrei Botila <andrei.botila@nxp.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Botila <andrei.botila@nxp.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Petrous (OSS) <jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-s32.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-s32.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-s32.c
index fba221c37594..da2cdcfd0529 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-s32.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-s32.c
@@ -140,6 +140,18 @@ static void s32_fix_mac_speed(void *priv, unsigned int speed, unsigned int mode)
 		dev_err(gmac->dev, "Can't set tx clock\n");
 }
 
+static void s32_dwmac_ptp_clk_freq_config(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
+{
+	struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat = priv->plat;
+
+	if (!plat->clk_ptp_ref)
+		return;
+
+	plat->clk_ptp_rate = clk_get_rate(plat->clk_ptp_ref);
+
+	netdev_dbg(priv->dev, "PTP rate %lu\n", plat->clk_ptp_rate);
+}
+
 static int s32_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat;
@@ -195,6 +207,7 @@ static int s32_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	plat->init = s32_gmac_init;
 	plat->exit = s32_gmac_exit;
 	plat->fix_mac_speed = s32_fix_mac_speed;
+	plat->ptp_clk_freq_config = s32_dwmac_ptp_clk_freq_config;
 
 	plat->bsp_priv = gmac;
 

-- 
2.46.0
Re: [PATCH v4 16/16] net: stmmac: dwmac-s32: Read PTP clock rate when ready
Posted by Andrew Lunn 3 weeks, 5 days ago
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:24:58PM +0100, Jan Petrous via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: "Jan Petrous (OSS)" <jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com>
> 
> The PTP clock is read by stmmac_platform during DT parse.
> On S32G/R the clock is not ready and returns 0. Postpone
> reading of the clock on PTP init.

This needs more explanation as to why this is a feature, not a bug,
for the PTP clock.

	Andrew
Re: [PATCH v4 16/16] net: stmmac: dwmac-s32: Read PTP clock rate when ready
Posted by Jan Petrous 1 week ago
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 01:18:43PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:24:58PM +0100, Jan Petrous via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: "Jan Petrous (OSS)" <jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com>
> > 
> > The PTP clock is read by stmmac_platform during DT parse.
> > On S32G/R the clock is not ready and returns 0. Postpone
> > reading of the clock on PTP init.
> 
> This needs more explanation as to why this is a feature, not a bug,
> for the PTP clock.
> 

Thanks for comment. I did a homework and found out the root cause is
using PTP clocks before they are properly enabled. As I understand,
the clocks, especially the composite variant, require preparation and/or
enabling them, what is not managed correctly for PTP clocks when
stmmac_platform is used. In this case, the PTP clock value is read this way:

   stmmac_probe_config_dt:
   // https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/4a5df37964673effcd9f84041f7423206a5ae5f2/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c#L634

	/* Fall-back to main clock in case of no PTP ref is passed */
	plat->clk_ptp_ref = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ptp_ref");
	if (IS_ERR(plat->clk_ptp_ref)) {
		plat->clk_ptp_rate = clk_get_rate(plat->stmmac_clk);
		plat->clk_ptp_ref = NULL;
		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PTP uses main clock\n");
	} else {
		plat->clk_ptp_rate = clk_get_rate(plat->clk_ptp_ref);
		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "PTP rate %d\n", plat->clk_ptp_rate);
	}

If I change getter to enabled getter:
	plat->clk_ptp_ref = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "ptp_ref");

The driver got valid rate and the patch is not needed anymore.

So, if I didn't miss something, it seems like I have to replace the current
patch with one fixing clk getter.

BR.
/Jan