[PATCH v12 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware

Arnaud Pouliquen posted 7 patches 1 month ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v12 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
Posted by Arnaud Pouliquen 1 month ago
The new TEE remoteproc driver is used to manage remote firmware in a
secure, trusted context. The 'st,stm32mp1-m4-tee' compatibility is
introduced to delegate the loading of the firmware to the trusted
execution context. In such cases, the firmware should be signed and
adhere to the image format defined by the TEE.

Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
---
updates vs previous version
- rename structures, variables and function from tee_rproc_xxx to
  rproc_tee_xxx,
- rework code to take into account rproc_tee_register and
  rproc_tee_unregister APIs update,
- optimize code around dev_err_probe() when rproc_tee_register() fails.
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 288bd70c7861..7875b26a38a5 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
 #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
+#include <linux/remoteproc_tee.h>
 #include <linux/reset.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
@@ -255,6 +256,19 @@ static int stm32_rproc_release(struct rproc *rproc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int stm32_rproc_tee_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	stm32_rproc_request_shutdown(rproc);
+
+	err = rproc_tee_stop(rproc);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	return stm32_rproc_release(rproc);
+}
+
 static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
@@ -691,8 +705,20 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
 	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
 };
 
+static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_tee_ops = {
+	.prepare	= stm32_rproc_prepare,
+	.start		= rproc_tee_start,
+	.stop		= stm32_rproc_tee_stop,
+	.kick		= stm32_rproc_kick,
+	.load		= rproc_tee_load_fw,
+	.parse_fw	= rproc_tee_parse_fw,
+	.find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_tee_find_loaded_rsc_table,
+	.release_fw	= rproc_tee_release_fw,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id stm32_rproc_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4" },
+	{ .compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" },
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32_rproc_match);
@@ -853,15 +879,36 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 	struct rproc *rproc;
 	unsigned int state;
+	u32 proc_id;
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
-	if (!rproc)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee")) {
+		/*
+		 * Delegate the firmware management to the secure context.
+		 * The firmware loaded has to be signed.
+		 */
+		ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "st,proc-id", &proc_id);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to read st,rproc-id property\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_tee_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
+		if (!rproc)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		ret = rproc_tee_register(dev, rproc, proc_id);
+		if (ret)
+			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,  "signed firmware not supported by TEE\n");
+	} else {
+		rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
+		if (!rproc)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+	}
 
 	ddata = rproc->priv;
 
@@ -913,6 +960,8 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
 		device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
 	}
+	rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -933,6 +982,8 @@ static void stm32_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
 		device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
 	}
+
+	rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
 }
 
 static int stm32_rproc_suspend(struct device *dev)
-- 
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH v12 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
Posted by kernel test robot 1 month ago
Hi Arnaud,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on 42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnaud-Pouliquen/remoteproc-core-Introduce-rproc_pa_to_va-helper/20241026-050443
base:   42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025205924.2087768-8-arnaud.pouliquen%40foss.st.com
patch subject: [PATCH v12 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241026/202410262040.PWNrKv2Q-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241026/202410262040.PWNrKv2Q-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410262040.PWNrKv2Q-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c: In function 'stm32_rproc_probe':
>> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:904:21: warning: assignment to 'int' from 'struct rproc_tee *' makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
     904 |                 ret = rproc_tee_register(dev, rproc, proc_id);
         |                     ^
   drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:963:30: error: passing argument 1 of 'rproc_tee_unregister' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
     963 |         rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
         |                              ^~~~~
         |                              |
         |                              struct rproc *
   In file included from drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:21:
   include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h:59:58: note: expected 'struct rproc_tee *' but argument is of type 'struct rproc *'
      59 | static inline int rproc_tee_unregister(struct rproc_tee *trproc)
         |                                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
   drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c: In function 'stm32_rproc_remove':
   drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:986:30: error: passing argument 1 of 'rproc_tee_unregister' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
     986 |         rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
         |                              ^~~~~
         |                              |
         |                              struct rproc *
   include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h:59:58: note: expected 'struct rproc_tee *' but argument is of type 'struct rproc *'
      59 | static inline int rproc_tee_unregister(struct rproc_tee *trproc)
         |                                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +904 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c

   874	
   875	static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
   876	{
   877		struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
   878		struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
   879		struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
   880		struct rproc *rproc;
   881		unsigned int state;
   882		u32 proc_id;
   883		int ret;
   884	
   885		ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
   886		if (ret)
   887			return ret;
   888	
   889		if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee")) {
   890			/*
   891			 * Delegate the firmware management to the secure context.
   892			 * The firmware loaded has to be signed.
   893			 */
   894			ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "st,proc-id", &proc_id);
   895			if (ret) {
   896				dev_err(dev, "failed to read st,rproc-id property\n");
   897				return ret;
   898			}
   899	
   900			rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_tee_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
   901			if (!rproc)
   902				return -ENOMEM;
   903	
 > 904			ret = rproc_tee_register(dev, rproc, proc_id);
   905			if (ret)
   906				return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,  "signed firmware not supported by TEE\n");
   907		} else {
   908			rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
   909			if (!rproc)
   910				return -ENOMEM;
   911		}
   912	
   913		ddata = rproc->priv;
   914	
   915		rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
   916	
   917		ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev, ddata, &rproc->auto_boot);
   918		if (ret)
   919			goto free_rproc;
   920	
   921		ret = stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
   922		if (ret)
   923			goto free_rproc;
   924	
   925		ret = stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(ddata, &state);
   926		if (ret)
   927			goto free_rproc;
   928	
   929		if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
   930			rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
   931	
   932		rproc->has_iommu = false;
   933		ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
   934		if (!ddata->workqueue) {
   935			dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
   936			ret = -ENOMEM;
   937			goto free_resources;
   938		}
   939	
   940		platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
   941	
   942		ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
   943		if (ret)
   944			goto free_wkq;
   945	
   946		ret = rproc_add(rproc);
   947		if (ret)
   948			goto free_mb;
   949	
   950		return 0;
   951	
   952	free_mb:
   953		stm32_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
   954	free_wkq:
   955		destroy_workqueue(ddata->workqueue);
   956	free_resources:
   957		rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
   958	free_rproc:
   959		if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
   960			dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
   961			device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
   962		}
   963		rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
   964	
   965		return ret;
   966	}
   967	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Re: [PATCH v12 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
Posted by kernel test robot 1 month ago
Hi Arnaud,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on 42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnaud-Pouliquen/remoteproc-core-Introduce-rproc_pa_to_va-helper/20241026-050443
base:   42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025205924.2087768-8-arnaud.pouliquen%40foss.st.com
patch subject: [PATCH v12 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-004-20241026 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241026/202410261837.eRmJAHKZ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.2 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 7ba7d8e2f7b6445b60679da826210cdde29eaf8b)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241026/202410261837.eRmJAHKZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410261837.eRmJAHKZ-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:9:
   In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:8:
   In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2213:
   include/linux/vmstat.h:518:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
     518 |         return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
         |                               ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
>> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:904:7: error: incompatible pointer to integer conversion assigning to 'int' from 'struct rproc_tee *' [-Wint-conversion]
     904 |                 ret = rproc_tee_register(dev, rproc, proc_id);
         |                     ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:963:23: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'struct rproc *' to parameter of type 'struct rproc_tee *' [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
     963 |         rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
         |                              ^~~~~
   include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h:59:58: note: passing argument to parameter 'trproc' here
      59 | static inline int rproc_tee_unregister(struct rproc_tee *trproc)
         |                                                          ^
   drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:986:23: error: incompatible pointer types passing 'struct rproc *' to parameter of type 'struct rproc_tee *' [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
     986 |         rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
         |                              ^~~~~
   include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h:59:58: note: passing argument to parameter 'trproc' here
      59 | static inline int rproc_tee_unregister(struct rproc_tee *trproc)
         |                                                          ^
   1 warning and 3 errors generated.


vim +904 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c

   874	
   875	static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
   876	{
   877		struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
   878		struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
   879		struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
   880		struct rproc *rproc;
   881		unsigned int state;
   882		u32 proc_id;
   883		int ret;
   884	
   885		ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
   886		if (ret)
   887			return ret;
   888	
   889		if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee")) {
   890			/*
   891			 * Delegate the firmware management to the secure context.
   892			 * The firmware loaded has to be signed.
   893			 */
   894			ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "st,proc-id", &proc_id);
   895			if (ret) {
   896				dev_err(dev, "failed to read st,rproc-id property\n");
   897				return ret;
   898			}
   899	
   900			rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_tee_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
   901			if (!rproc)
   902				return -ENOMEM;
   903	
 > 904			ret = rproc_tee_register(dev, rproc, proc_id);
   905			if (ret)
   906				return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,  "signed firmware not supported by TEE\n");
   907		} else {
   908			rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
   909			if (!rproc)
   910				return -ENOMEM;
   911		}
   912	
   913		ddata = rproc->priv;
   914	
   915		rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
   916	
   917		ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev, ddata, &rproc->auto_boot);
   918		if (ret)
   919			goto free_rproc;
   920	
   921		ret = stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
   922		if (ret)
   923			goto free_rproc;
   924	
   925		ret = stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(ddata, &state);
   926		if (ret)
   927			goto free_rproc;
   928	
   929		if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
   930			rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
   931	
   932		rproc->has_iommu = false;
   933		ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
   934		if (!ddata->workqueue) {
   935			dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
   936			ret = -ENOMEM;
   937			goto free_resources;
   938		}
   939	
   940		platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
   941	
   942		ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
   943		if (ret)
   944			goto free_wkq;
   945	
   946		ret = rproc_add(rproc);
   947		if (ret)
   948			goto free_mb;
   949	
   950		return 0;
   951	
   952	free_mb:
   953		stm32_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
   954	free_wkq:
   955		destroy_workqueue(ddata->workqueue);
   956	free_resources:
   957		rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
   958	free_rproc:
   959		if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
   960			dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
   961			device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
   962		}
 > 963		rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
   964	
   965		return ret;
   966	}
   967	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Re: [PATCH v12 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
Posted by kernel test robot 1 month ago
Hi Arnaud,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on 42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnaud-Pouliquen/remoteproc-core-Introduce-rproc_pa_to_va-helper/20241026-050443
base:   42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025205924.2087768-8-arnaud.pouliquen%40foss.st.com
patch subject: [PATCH v12 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241026/202410261701.jz99xF8B-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241026/202410261701.jz99xF8B-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410261701.jz99xF8B-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c: In function 'stm32_rproc_probe':
>> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:904:21: error: assignment to 'int' from 'struct rproc_tee *' makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
     904 |                 ret = rproc_tee_register(dev, rproc, proc_id);
         |                     ^
>> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:963:30: error: passing argument 1 of 'rproc_tee_unregister' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
     963 |         rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
         |                              ^~~~~
         |                              |
         |                              struct rproc *
   In file included from drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:21:
   include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h:59:58: note: expected 'struct rproc_tee *' but argument is of type 'struct rproc *'
      59 | static inline int rproc_tee_unregister(struct rproc_tee *trproc)
         |                                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
   drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c: In function 'stm32_rproc_remove':
   drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:986:30: error: passing argument 1 of 'rproc_tee_unregister' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
     986 |         rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
         |                              ^~~~~
         |                              |
         |                              struct rproc *
   include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h:59:58: note: expected 'struct rproc_tee *' but argument is of type 'struct rproc *'
      59 | static inline int rproc_tee_unregister(struct rproc_tee *trproc)
         |                                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~

Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for GET_FREE_REGION
   Depends on [n]: SPARSEMEM [=n]
   Selected by [y]:
   - RESOURCE_KUNIT_TEST [=y] && RUNTIME_TESTING_MENU [=y] && KUNIT [=y]


vim +904 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c

   874	
   875	static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
   876	{
   877		struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
   878		struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
   879		struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
   880		struct rproc *rproc;
   881		unsigned int state;
   882		u32 proc_id;
   883		int ret;
   884	
   885		ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
   886		if (ret)
   887			return ret;
   888	
   889		if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee")) {
   890			/*
   891			 * Delegate the firmware management to the secure context.
   892			 * The firmware loaded has to be signed.
   893			 */
   894			ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "st,proc-id", &proc_id);
   895			if (ret) {
   896				dev_err(dev, "failed to read st,rproc-id property\n");
   897				return ret;
   898			}
   899	
   900			rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_tee_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
   901			if (!rproc)
   902				return -ENOMEM;
   903	
 > 904			ret = rproc_tee_register(dev, rproc, proc_id);
   905			if (ret)
   906				return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,  "signed firmware not supported by TEE\n");
   907		} else {
   908			rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
   909			if (!rproc)
   910				return -ENOMEM;
   911		}
   912	
   913		ddata = rproc->priv;
   914	
   915		rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
   916	
   917		ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev, ddata, &rproc->auto_boot);
   918		if (ret)
   919			goto free_rproc;
   920	
   921		ret = stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
   922		if (ret)
   923			goto free_rproc;
   924	
   925		ret = stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(ddata, &state);
   926		if (ret)
   927			goto free_rproc;
   928	
   929		if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
   930			rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
   931	
   932		rproc->has_iommu = false;
   933		ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
   934		if (!ddata->workqueue) {
   935			dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
   936			ret = -ENOMEM;
   937			goto free_resources;
   938		}
   939	
   940		platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
   941	
   942		ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
   943		if (ret)
   944			goto free_wkq;
   945	
   946		ret = rproc_add(rproc);
   947		if (ret)
   948			goto free_mb;
   949	
   950		return 0;
   951	
   952	free_mb:
   953		stm32_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
   954	free_wkq:
   955		destroy_workqueue(ddata->workqueue);
   956	free_resources:
   957		rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
   958	free_rproc:
   959		if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
   960			dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
   961			device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
   962		}
 > 963		rproc_tee_unregister(rproc);
   964	
   965		return ret;
   966	}
   967	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki