[PATCH v3 6/6] cxl/test: Update test code for event records to CXL spec rev 3.1

shiju.jose@huawei.com posted 6 patches 1 month ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 6/6] cxl/test: Update test code for event records to CXL spec rev 3.1
Posted by shiju.jose@huawei.com 1 month ago
From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>

Update test code for General Media, DRAM, Memory Module Event
Records to CXL spec rev 3.1.

Signed-off-by: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
---
 tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c
index ad5c4c18c5c6..614783eb3f84 100644
--- a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c
+++ b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c
@@ -401,6 +401,10 @@ struct cxl_test_gen_media gen_media = {
 			.channel = 1,
 			.rank = 30,
 		},
+		.component_id = { 0x3, 0x74, 0xc5, 0x8, 0x9a, 0x1a, 0xb, 0xfc, 0xd2, 0x7e, 0x2f, 0x31, 0x9b, 0x3c, 0x81, 0x4d },
+		.cme_threshold_ev_flags = 3,
+		.cme_count = { 33, 0, 0 },
+		.sub_type = 0x2,
 	},
 };
 
@@ -429,6 +433,11 @@ struct cxl_test_dram dram = {
 		.bank_group = 5,
 		.bank = 2,
 		.column = {0xDE, 0xAD},
+		.component_id = { 0x1, 0x74, 0xc5, 0x8, 0x9a, 0x1a, 0xb, 0xfc, 0xd2, 0x7e, 0x2f, 0x31, 0x9b, 0x3c, 0x81, 0x4d },
+		.sub_channel = 8,
+		.cme_threshold_ev_flags = 2,
+		.cvme_count = { 14, 0, 0 },
+		.sub_type = 0x5,
 	},
 };
 
@@ -456,7 +465,10 @@ struct cxl_test_mem_module mem_module = {
 			.dirty_shutdown_cnt = { 0xde, 0xad, 0xbe, 0xef },
 			.cor_vol_err_cnt = { 0xde, 0xad, 0xbe, 0xef },
 			.cor_per_err_cnt = { 0xde, 0xad, 0xbe, 0xef },
-		}
+		},
+		/* .validity_flags = <set below> */
+		.component_id = { 0x2, 0x74, 0xc5, 0x8, 0x9a, 0x1a, 0xb, 0xfc, 0xd2, 0x7e, 0x2f, 0x31, 0x9b, 0x3c, 0x81, 0x4d },
+		.event_sub_type = 0x3,
 	},
 };
 
@@ -478,13 +490,18 @@ static int mock_set_timestamp(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
 
 static void cxl_mock_add_event_logs(struct mock_event_store *mes)
 {
-	put_unaligned_le16(CXL_GMER_VALID_CHANNEL | CXL_GMER_VALID_RANK,
+	put_unaligned_le16(CXL_GMER_VALID_CHANNEL | CXL_GMER_VALID_RANK |
+			   CXL_GMER_VALID_COMPONENT | CXL_GMER_VALID_COMPONENT_ID_FORMAT,
 			   &gen_media.rec.media_hdr.validity_flags);
 
 	put_unaligned_le16(CXL_DER_VALID_CHANNEL | CXL_DER_VALID_BANK_GROUP |
-			   CXL_DER_VALID_BANK | CXL_DER_VALID_COLUMN,
+			   CXL_DER_VALID_BANK | CXL_DER_VALID_COLUMN | CXL_DER_VALID_SUB_CHANNEL |
+			   CXL_DER_VALID_COMPONENT | CXL_DER_VALID_COMPONENT_ID_FORMAT,
 			   &dram.rec.media_hdr.validity_flags);
 
+	put_unaligned_le16(CXL_MMER_VALID_COMPONENT | CXL_MMER_VALID_COMPONENT_ID_FORMAT,
+			   &mem_module.rec.validity_flags);
+
 	mes_add_event(mes, CXL_EVENT_TYPE_INFO, &maint_needed);
 	mes_add_event(mes, CXL_EVENT_TYPE_INFO,
 		      (struct cxl_event_record_raw *)&gen_media);
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] cxl/test: Update test code for event records to CXL spec rev 3.1
Posted by Jonathan Cameron 1 month ago
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 12:45:55 +0100
<shiju.jose@huawei.com> wrote:

> From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
> 
> Update test code for General Media, DRAM, Memory Module Event
> Records to CXL spec rev 3.1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
I ran the test and it looked sensible.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>


Side note, cxl_test fails on ARM due to attempting to hotplug
memory outside of the PA range the system supports.  Problem
for another day when I'll either fix it post a proper bug report.

Jonathan

> ---
>  tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c
> index ad5c4c18c5c6..614783eb3f84 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c
> @@ -401,6 +401,10 @@ struct cxl_test_gen_media gen_media = {
>  			.channel = 1,
>  			.rank = 30,
>  		},
> +		.component_id = { 0x3, 0x74, 0xc5, 0x8, 0x9a, 0x1a, 0xb, 0xfc, 0xd2, 0x7e, 0x2f, 0x31, 0x9b, 0x3c, 0x81, 0x4d },
> +		.cme_threshold_ev_flags = 3,
> +		.cme_count = { 33, 0, 0 },
> +		.sub_type = 0x2,
>  	},
>  };
>  
> @@ -429,6 +433,11 @@ struct cxl_test_dram dram = {
>  		.bank_group = 5,
>  		.bank = 2,
>  		.column = {0xDE, 0xAD},
> +		.component_id = { 0x1, 0x74, 0xc5, 0x8, 0x9a, 0x1a, 0xb, 0xfc, 0xd2, 0x7e, 0x2f, 0x31, 0x9b, 0x3c, 0x81, 0x4d },
> +		.sub_channel = 8,
> +		.cme_threshold_ev_flags = 2,
> +		.cvme_count = { 14, 0, 0 },
> +		.sub_type = 0x5,
>  	},
>  };
>  
> @@ -456,7 +465,10 @@ struct cxl_test_mem_module mem_module = {
>  			.dirty_shutdown_cnt = { 0xde, 0xad, 0xbe, 0xef },
>  			.cor_vol_err_cnt = { 0xde, 0xad, 0xbe, 0xef },
>  			.cor_per_err_cnt = { 0xde, 0xad, 0xbe, 0xef },
> -		}
> +		},
> +		/* .validity_flags = <set below> */
> +		.component_id = { 0x2, 0x74, 0xc5, 0x8, 0x9a, 0x1a, 0xb, 0xfc, 0xd2, 0x7e, 0x2f, 0x31, 0x9b, 0x3c, 0x81, 0x4d },
> +		.event_sub_type = 0x3,
>  	},
>  };
>  
> @@ -478,13 +490,18 @@ static int mock_set_timestamp(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>  
>  static void cxl_mock_add_event_logs(struct mock_event_store *mes)
>  {
> -	put_unaligned_le16(CXL_GMER_VALID_CHANNEL | CXL_GMER_VALID_RANK,
> +	put_unaligned_le16(CXL_GMER_VALID_CHANNEL | CXL_GMER_VALID_RANK |
> +			   CXL_GMER_VALID_COMPONENT | CXL_GMER_VALID_COMPONENT_ID_FORMAT,
>  			   &gen_media.rec.media_hdr.validity_flags);
>  
>  	put_unaligned_le16(CXL_DER_VALID_CHANNEL | CXL_DER_VALID_BANK_GROUP |
> -			   CXL_DER_VALID_BANK | CXL_DER_VALID_COLUMN,
> +			   CXL_DER_VALID_BANK | CXL_DER_VALID_COLUMN | CXL_DER_VALID_SUB_CHANNEL |
> +			   CXL_DER_VALID_COMPONENT | CXL_DER_VALID_COMPONENT_ID_FORMAT,
>  			   &dram.rec.media_hdr.validity_flags);
>  
> +	put_unaligned_le16(CXL_MMER_VALID_COMPONENT | CXL_MMER_VALID_COMPONENT_ID_FORMAT,
> +			   &mem_module.rec.validity_flags);
> +
>  	mes_add_event(mes, CXL_EVENT_TYPE_INFO, &maint_needed);
>  	mes_add_event(mes, CXL_EVENT_TYPE_INFO,
>  		      (struct cxl_event_record_raw *)&gen_media);