drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
In extcon_rtk_type_c_probe() devm_kzalloc() may return NULL but this
returned value is not checked.
Fixes: 8a590d7371f0 ("extcon: add Realtek DHC RTD SoC Type-C driver")
Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
---
drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c
index 19a01e663733..2820c7e82481 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c
@@ -1369,6 +1369,8 @@ static int extcon_rtk_type_c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
type_c->type_c_cfg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*type_c_cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!type_c->type_c_cfg)
+ return -ENOMEM;
memcpy(type_c->type_c_cfg, type_c_cfg, sizeof(*type_c_cfg));
--
2.31.1
Hi,
Applied it. Thanks.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 6:55 PM Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com> wrote:
>
> In extcon_rtk_type_c_probe() devm_kzalloc() may return NULL but this
> returned value is not checked.
>
> Fixes: 8a590d7371f0 ("extcon: add Realtek DHC RTD SoC Type-C driver")
> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c
> index 19a01e663733..2820c7e82481 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-rtk-type-c.c
> @@ -1369,6 +1369,8 @@ static int extcon_rtk_type_c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> type_c->type_c_cfg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*type_c_cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!type_c->type_c_cfg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> memcpy(type_c->type_c_cfg, type_c_cfg, sizeof(*type_c_cfg));
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
> In extcon_rtk_type_c_probe() devm_kzalloc() may return NULL but this > returned value is not checked. Another wording suggestion: A devm_kzalloc() call can return a null pointer on failure. But such a return value was not checked in this function implementation. Thus add a corresponding check so that a null pointer dereference will be avoided. Would a summary phrase like “Prevent null pointer dereference in extcon_rtk_type_c_probe()” be a bit nicer? Regards, Markus
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.