The A100, similar to the H6 and H616, use an NVMEM value to determine
speed binnings. The method used is similar to that of the H6. However,
the information is stored at a slightly different bit offset.

Add a new compatible for the A100.

Signed-off-by: Cody Eksal <masterr3c0rd@epochal.quest>
---
 .../bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml       | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
index ec5e424bb3c8..603c6c88d080 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
   compatible:
     enum:
       - allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points
+      - allwinner,sun50i-a100-operating-points
       - allwinner,sun50i-h616-operating-points
 
   nvmem-cells:
-- 
2.47.0

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 02:05:29PM -0300, Cody Eksal wrote:
> The A100, similar to the H6 and H616, use an NVMEM value to determine
> speed binnings. The method used is similar to that of the H6. However,
> the information is stored at a slightly different bit offset.
> 
> Add a new compatible for the A100.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cody Eksal <masterr3c0rd@epochal.quest>
> ---
>  .../bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml       | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
> index ec5e424bb3c8..603c6c88d080 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
>    compatible:
>      enum:
>        - allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points
> +      - allwinner,sun50i-a100-operating-points
>        - allwinner,sun50i-h616-operating-points

I have no clue why a100 is between h6 and h616. :/

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On 2024/10/27 5:47 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 02:05:29PM -0300, Cody Eksal wrote:
>> diff --git 
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
>> index ec5e424bb3c8..603c6c88d080 100644
>> --- 
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
>> +++ 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
>>    compatible:
>>      enum:
>>        - allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points
>> +      - allwinner,sun50i-a100-operating-points
>>        - allwinner,sun50i-h616-operating-points
> 
> I have no clue why a100 is between h6 and h616. :/
 From my understanding, the A100 was released before the H616, but after 
the H6. There are not many sources to rely on for this, but the H6 
appears to have launched in 2017, the A100 in 2019, and the H616 in 
2020.

I assumed ordering was intended to be in chronological order; perhaps it 
was intended to be in lexicographical order instead? If so, I can move 
this entry above the H6.

- Cody
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

On 27/10/2024 22:13, Cody Eksal wrote:
> On 2024/10/27 5:47 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 02:05:29PM -0300, Cody Eksal wrote:
>>> diff --git 
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml 
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
>>> index ec5e424bb3c8..603c6c88d080 100644
>>> --- 
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
>>> +++ 
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
>>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
>>>    compatible:
>>>      enum:
>>>        - allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points
>>> +      - allwinner,sun50i-a100-operating-points
>>>        - allwinner,sun50i-h616-operating-points
>>
>> I have no clue why a100 is between h6 and h616. :/
>  From my understanding, the A100 was released before the H616, but after 
> the H6. There are not many sources to rely on for this, but the H6 
> appears to have launched in 2017, the A100 in 2019, and the H616 in 
> 2020.
> 
> I assumed ordering was intended to be in chronological order; perhaps it 
> was intended to be in lexicographical order instead? If so, I can move 
> this entry above the H6.

Most, really most of the lists in the bindings are ordered
alphanumerically, because that's the only order all people will get and
all people can really verify. There are exceptions. If that's the one
here, then sure, keep chronological order.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On 2024/10/27 6:17 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/10/2024 22:13, Cody Eksal wrote:
>> On 2024/10/27 5:47 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 02:05:29PM -0300, Cody Eksal wrote:
>>>> diff --git
>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
>>>> index ec5e424bb3c8..603c6c88d080 100644
>>>> ---
>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
>>>> +++
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points.yaml
>>>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
>>>>    compatible:
>>>>      enum:
>>>>        - allwinner,sun50i-h6-operating-points
>>>> +      - allwinner,sun50i-a100-operating-points
>>>>        - allwinner,sun50i-h616-operating-points
>>> 
>>> I have no clue why a100 is between h6 and h616. :/
>>  From my understanding, the A100 was released before the H616, but 
>> after
>> the H6. There are not many sources to rely on for this, but the H6
>> appears to have launched in 2017, the A100 in 2019, and the H616 in
>> 2020.
>> 
>> I assumed ordering was intended to be in chronological order; perhaps 
>> it
>> was intended to be in lexicographical order instead? If so, I can move
>> this entry above the H6.
> 
> Most, really most of the lists in the bindings are ordered
> alphanumerically, because that's the only order all people will get and
> all people can really verify. There are exceptions. If that's the one
> here, then sure, keep chronological order.
After reviewing other files, it seems like alphanumeric ordering is 
normally used in the bindings for these peripherals. I'll update in V2.

Thank you!
- Cody
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof