drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
This reverts commit ac88a1f41f93499df6f50fd18ea835e6ff4f3200.
Reason for revert:
1. The commit [1] does not land on linux-5.15, so this patch does not
fix anything.
2. Since the fw_device improvements series [2] does not land on
linux-5.15, using device_set_fwnode() causes the panel to flash during
bootup.
Incorrect link management may lead to incorrect device initialization,
affecting firmware node links and consumer relationships.
The fwnode setting of panel to the DSI device would cause a DSI
initialization error without series[2], so this patch was reverted to
avoid using the incomplete fw_devlink functionality.
[1] commit 3fb16866b51d ("driver core: fw_devlink: Make cycle detection more robust")
[2] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230207014207.1678715-1-saravanak@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
index 24606b632009..468a3a7cb6a5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ mipi_dsi_device_register_full(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
return dsi;
}
- device_set_node(&dsi->dev, of_fwnode_handle(info->node));
+ dsi->dev.of_node = info->node;
dsi->channel = info->channel;
strlcpy(dsi->name, info->type, sizeof(dsi->name));
---
base-commit: 74cdd62cb4706515b454ce5bacb73b566c1d1bcf
change-id: 20241024-fixup-5-15-5fdd68dae707
Best regards,
--
Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:37:13PM +0800, Jason-JH.Lin via B4 Relay wrote: > From: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > > This reverts commit ac88a1f41f93499df6f50fd18ea835e6ff4f3200. > > Reason for revert: > 1. The commit [1] does not land on linux-5.15, so this patch does not > fix anything. > > 2. Since the fw_device improvements series [2] does not land on > linux-5.15, using device_set_fwnode() causes the panel to flash during > bootup. > > Incorrect link management may lead to incorrect device initialization, > affecting firmware node links and consumer relationships. > The fwnode setting of panel to the DSI device would cause a DSI > initialization error without series[2], so this patch was reverted to > avoid using the incomplete fw_devlink functionality. > > [1] commit 3fb16866b51d ("driver core: fw_devlink: Make cycle detection more robust") > [2] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230207014207.1678715-1-saravanak@google.com > > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c > index 24606b632009..468a3a7cb6a5 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c > @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ mipi_dsi_device_register_full(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, > return dsi; > } > > - device_set_node(&dsi->dev, of_fwnode_handle(info->node)); > + dsi->dev.of_node = info->node; > dsi->channel = info->channel; > strlcpy(dsi->name, info->type, sizeof(dsi->name)); > > > --- > base-commit: 74cdd62cb4706515b454ce5bacb73b566c1d1bcf > change-id: 20241024-fixup-5-15-5fdd68dae707 > > Best regards, > -- > Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > > > <formletter> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly. </formletter>
Hi Greg, Thanks for your information. On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 11:47 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until > you have verified the sender or the content. > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:37:13PM +0800, Jason-JH.Lin via B4 Relay > wrote: > > From: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > > > > This reverts commit ac88a1f41f93499df6f50fd18ea835e6ff4f3200. > > > > Reason for revert: > > 1. The commit [1] does not land on linux-5.15, so this patch does > not > > fix anything. > > > > 2. Since the fw_device improvements series [2] does not land on > > linux-5.15, using device_set_fwnode() causes the panel to flash > during > > bootup. > > > > Incorrect link management may lead to incorrect device > initialization, > > affecting firmware node links and consumer relationships. > > The fwnode setting of panel to the DSI device would cause a DSI > > initialization error without series[2], so this patch was reverted > to > > avoid using the incomplete fw_devlink functionality. > > > > [1] commit 3fb16866b51d ("driver core: fw_devlink: Make cycle > detection more robust") > > [2] Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230207014207.1678715-1-saravanak@google.com > > Please don't mind me make a confirmation. I just need to add this line here and send it again, right? Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #5.15.169 > > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > > --- Regards, Jason-JH.Lin > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c > > index 24606b632009..468a3a7cb6a5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c > > @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ mipi_dsi_device_register_full(struct > mipi_dsi_host *host, > > return dsi; > > } > > > > -device_set_node(&dsi->dev, of_fwnode_handle(info->node)); > > +dsi->dev.of_node = info->node; > > dsi->channel = info->channel; > > strlcpy(dsi->name, info->type, sizeof(dsi->name)); > > > > > > --- > > base-commit: 74cdd62cb4706515b454ce5bacb73b566c1d1bcf > > change-id: 20241024-fixup-5-15-5fdd68dae707 > > > > Best regards, > > -- > > Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > > > > > > > > <formletter> > > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > stable kernel tree. Please read: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > for how to do this properly. > > </formletter>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:16:05AM +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Thanks for your information. > > On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 11:47 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until > > you have verified the sender or the content. > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:37:13PM +0800, Jason-JH.Lin via B4 Relay > > wrote: > > > From: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > > > > > > This reverts commit ac88a1f41f93499df6f50fd18ea835e6ff4f3200. > > > > > > Reason for revert: > > > 1. The commit [1] does not land on linux-5.15, so this patch does > > not > > > fix anything. > > > > > > 2. Since the fw_device improvements series [2] does not land on > > > linux-5.15, using device_set_fwnode() causes the panel to flash > > during > > > bootup. > > > > > > Incorrect link management may lead to incorrect device > > initialization, > > > affecting firmware node links and consumer relationships. > > > The fwnode setting of panel to the DSI device would cause a DSI > > > initialization error without series[2], so this patch was reverted > > to > > > avoid using the incomplete fw_devlink functionality. > > > > > > [1] commit 3fb16866b51d ("driver core: fw_devlink: Make cycle > > detection more robust") > > > [2] Link: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230207014207.1678715-1-saravanak@google.com > > > > > Please don't mind me make a confirmation. > I just need to add this line here and send it again, right? > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #5.15.169 Yes.
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 12:23 +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until > you have verified the sender or the content. > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:16:05AM +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Thanks for your information. > > > > On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 11:47 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments > until > > > you have verified the sender or the content. > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:37:13PM +0800, Jason-JH.Lin via B4 > Relay > > > wrote: > > > > From: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > > > > > > > > This reverts commit ac88a1f41f93499df6f50fd18ea835e6ff4f3200. > > > > > > > > Reason for revert: > > > > 1. The commit [1] does not land on linux-5.15, so this patch > does > > > not > > > > fix anything. > > > > > > > > 2. Since the fw_device improvements series [2] does not land on > > > > linux-5.15, using device_set_fwnode() causes the panel to flash > > > during > > > > bootup. > > > > > > > > Incorrect link management may lead to incorrect device > > > initialization, > > > > affecting firmware node links and consumer relationships. > > > > The fwnode setting of panel to the DSI device would cause a DSI > > > > initialization error without series[2], so this patch was > reverted > > > to > > > > avoid using the incomplete fw_devlink functionality. > > > > > > > > [1] commit 3fb16866b51d ("driver core: fw_devlink: Make cycle > > > detection more robust") > > > > [2] Link: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230207014207.1678715-1-saravanak@google.com > > > > > > > > Please don't mind me make a confirmation. > > I just need to add this line here and send it again, right? > > > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #5.15.169 > > Yes. Hi Greg, Thanks for your confirmation! I've sent the patch again without adding `v2` after the [PATCH]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241024-fixup-5-15-v1-1-62f21a32b5a5@mediatek.com Would that be fine with you? Regards, Jason-JH.Lin
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 02:38:49AM +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote: > On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 12:23 +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until > > you have verified the sender or the content. > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:16:05AM +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > Thanks for your information. > > > > > > On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 11:47 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments > > until > > > > you have verified the sender or the content. > > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:37:13PM +0800, Jason-JH.Lin via B4 > > Relay > > > > wrote: > > > > > From: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > > > > > > > > > > This reverts commit ac88a1f41f93499df6f50fd18ea835e6ff4f3200. > > > > > > > > > > Reason for revert: > > > > > 1. The commit [1] does not land on linux-5.15, so this patch > > does > > > > not > > > > > fix anything. > > > > > > > > > > 2. Since the fw_device improvements series [2] does not land on > > > > > linux-5.15, using device_set_fwnode() causes the panel to flash > > > > during > > > > > bootup. > > > > > > > > > > Incorrect link management may lead to incorrect device > > > > initialization, > > > > > affecting firmware node links and consumer relationships. > > > > > The fwnode setting of panel to the DSI device would cause a DSI > > > > > initialization error without series[2], so this patch was > > reverted > > > > to > > > > > avoid using the incomplete fw_devlink functionality. > > > > > > > > > > [1] commit 3fb16866b51d ("driver core: fw_devlink: Make cycle > > > > detection more robust") > > > > > [2] Link: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230207014207.1678715-1-saravanak@google.com > > > > > > > > > > > Please don't mind me make a confirmation. > > > I just need to add this line here and send it again, right? > > > > > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #5.15.169 > > > > Yes. > > Hi Greg, > > Thanks for your confirmation! > > I've sent the patch again without adding `v2` after the [PATCH]: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241024-fixup-5-15-v1-1-62f21a32b5a5@mediatek.com > Would that be fine with you? But it is a v2 patch, why not mark it as such?
[snip] > > > > > > > > Please don't mind me make a confirmation. > > > > I just need to add this line here and send it again, right? > > > > > > > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #5.15.169 > > > > > > Yes. > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > Thanks for your confirmation! > > > > I've sent the patch again without adding `v2` after the [PATCH]: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241024-fixup-5-15-v1-1-62f21a32b5a5@mediatek.com > > Would that be fine with you? > > But it is a v2 patch, why not mark it as such? I thought correcting format is not changing commit message or modification, so I didn't increase the version number. Anyway, I've sent the v2 again: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241028-fixup-5-15-v2-1-40216f0fe383@mediatek.com Regards, Jason-JH.Lin
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.