Adds support for the Bosch BMI260 6-axis IMU to the Bosch BMI270
driver. Setup and operation is nearly identical to the Bosch BMI270,
but has a different chip ID and requires different firmware.
Firmware is requested and loaded from userspace.
Signed-off-by: Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com>
---
drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h | 1 +
drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c | 13 +++++++++++++
drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c | 8 ++++++++
4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
index 2e8d85a4e419..51e374fd4290 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct bmi270_data {
};
enum bmi270_device_type {
+ BMI260,
BMI270,
};
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c
index 799df78ec862..b30201dc4e22 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
#include "bmi270.h"
#define BMI270_CHIP_ID_REG 0x00
+#define BMI160_CHIP_ID_VAL 0xD1
+#define BMI260_CHIP_ID_VAL 0x27
#define BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL 0x24
#define BMI270_CHIP_ID_MSK GENMASK(7, 0)
@@ -55,6 +57,7 @@
#define BMI270_PWR_CTRL_ACCEL_EN_MSK BIT(2)
#define BMI270_PWR_CTRL_TEMP_EN_MSK BIT(3)
+#define BMI260_INIT_DATA_FILE "bmi260-init-data.fw"
#define BMI270_INIT_DATA_FILE "bmi270-init-data.fw"
enum bmi270_scan {
@@ -67,6 +70,11 @@ enum bmi270_scan {
};
const struct bmi270_chip_info bmi270_chip_info[] = {
+ [BMI260] = {
+ .name = "bmi260",
+ .chip_id = BMI260_CHIP_ID_VAL,
+ .fw_name = BMI260_INIT_DATA_FILE,
+ },
[BMI270] = {
.name = "bmi270",
.chip_id = BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL,
@@ -163,8 +171,21 @@ static int bmi270_validate_chip_id(struct bmi270_data *bmi270_device)
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to read chip id");
- if (chip_id != BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL)
- dev_info(dev, "Unknown chip id 0x%x", chip_id);
+ /*
+ * Some manufacturers use "BMI0160" for both the BMI160 and
+ * BMI260. If the device is actually a BMI160, the bmi160
+ * driver should handle it and this driver should not.
+ */
+ if (chip_id == BMI160_CHIP_ID_VAL)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (chip_id != bmi270_device->chip_info->chip_id)
+ dev_info(dev, "Unexpected chip id 0x%x", chip_id);
+
+ if (chip_id == BMI260_CHIP_ID_VAL)
+ bmi270_device->chip_info = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI260];
+ else if (chip_id == BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL)
+ bmi270_device->chip_info = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI270];
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c
index 742149701849..d6417b7c799c 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c
@@ -33,11 +33,23 @@ static int bmi270_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
}
static const struct i2c_device_id bmi270_i2c_id[] = {
+ { "bmi260", (kernel_ulong_t)&bmi270_chip_info[BMI260] },
{ "bmi270", (kernel_ulong_t)&bmi270_chip_info[BMI270] },
{ }
};
+static const struct acpi_device_id bmi270_acpi_match[] = {
+ /* OrangePi NEO */
+ { "BMI0260", (kernel_ulong_t)&bmi270_chip_info[BMI260] },
+ /* GPD Win Mini, Aya Neo AIR Pro, OXP Mini Pro, etc. */
+ { "BMI0160", (kernel_ulong_t)&bmi270_chip_info[BMI260] },
+ /* GPD Win Max 2 */
+ { "10EC5280", (kernel_ulong_t)&bmi270_chip_info[BMI260] },
+ { }
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id bmi270_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "bosch,bmi260", .data = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI260] },
{ .compatible = "bosch,bmi270", .data = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI270] },
{ }
};
@@ -45,6 +57,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id bmi270_of_match[] = {
static struct i2c_driver bmi270_i2c_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "bmi270_i2c",
+ .acpi_match_table = bmi270_acpi_match,
.of_match_table = bmi270_of_match,
},
.probe = bmi270_i2c_probe,
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c
index 3d240f9651bc..88173e9a3529 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c
@@ -66,11 +66,18 @@ static int bmi270_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
}
static const struct spi_device_id bmi270_spi_id[] = {
+ { "bmi260", (kernel_ulong_t)&bmi270_chip_info[BMI260] },
{ "bmi270", (kernel_ulong_t)&bmi270_chip_info[BMI270] },
{ }
};
+static const struct acpi_device_id bmi270_acpi_match[] = {
+ { "BOSC0260", (kernel_ulong_t)&bmi270_chip_info[BMI260] },
+ { }
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id bmi270_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "bosch,bmi260", .data = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI260] },
{ .compatible = "bosch,bmi270", .data = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI270] },
{ }
};
@@ -78,6 +85,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id bmi270_of_match[] = {
static struct spi_driver bmi270_spi_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "bmi270",
+ .acpi_match_table = bmi270_acpi_match,
.of_match_table = bmi270_of_match,
},
.probe = bmi270_spi_probe,
--
2.47.0On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:36:10 -0700
Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com> wrote:
> Adds support for the Bosch BMI260 6-axis IMU to the Bosch BMI270
> driver. Setup and operation is nearly identical to the Bosch BMI270,
> but has a different chip ID and requires different firmware.
>
> Firmware is requested and loaded from userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com>
Trivial comments inline and a discussion on whether my earlier
don't use an array comment makes sense in this particular case.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h | 1 +
> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c | 8 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
> index 2e8d85a4e419..51e374fd4290 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct bmi270_data {
> };
>
> enum bmi270_device_type {
> + BMI260,
> BMI270,
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c
> index 799df78ec862..b30201dc4e22 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
> #include "bmi270.h"
>
> #define BMI270_CHIP_ID_REG 0x00
> +#define BMI160_CHIP_ID_VAL 0xD1
This one looks like a cut and paste error.
> +#define BMI260_CHIP_ID_VAL 0x27
> #define BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL 0x24
> #define BMI270_CHIP_ID_MSK GENMASK(7, 0)
>
> @@ -55,6 +57,7 @@
> #define BMI270_PWR_CTRL_ACCEL_EN_MSK BIT(2)
> #define BMI270_PWR_CTRL_TEMP_EN_MSK BIT(3)
>
> +#define BMI260_INIT_DATA_FILE "bmi260-init-data.fw"
> #define BMI270_INIT_DATA_FILE "bmi270-init-data.fw"
>
> enum bmi270_scan {
> @@ -67,6 +70,11 @@ enum bmi270_scan {
> };
>
> const struct bmi270_chip_info bmi270_chip_info[] = {
> + [BMI260] = {
> + .name = "bmi260",
> + .chip_id = BMI260_CHIP_ID_VAL,
> + .fw_name = BMI260_INIT_DATA_FILE,
> + },
> [BMI270] = {
> .name = "bmi270",
> .chip_id = BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL,
> @@ -163,8 +171,21 @@ static int bmi270_validate_chip_id(struct bmi270_data *bmi270_device)
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to read chip id");
>
> - if (chip_id != BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL)
> - dev_info(dev, "Unknown chip id 0x%x", chip_id);
> + /*
> + * Some manufacturers use "BMI0160" for both the BMI160 and
> + * BMI260. If the device is actually a BMI160, the bmi160
> + * driver should handle it and this driver should not.
> + */
> + if (chip_id == BMI160_CHIP_ID_VAL)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (chip_id != bmi270_device->chip_info->chip_id)
> + dev_info(dev, "Unexpected chip id 0x%x", chip_id);
> +
> + if (chip_id == BMI260_CHIP_ID_VAL)
Ah. My argument on separate IDs means you'd have to do it this way whereas
I was thinking maybe a loop would be a better idea. Ah well if we
get a lot of supported chips, then we can rethink how to handle this.
For now what you have here is fine and should deal with lack of appropriate
ACPI ID mess.
> + bmi270_device->chip_info = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI260];
> + else if (chip_id == BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL)
> + bmi270_device->chip_info = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI270];
>
> return 0;
> }
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> writes:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:36:10 -0700
> Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com> wrote:
>
>> Adds support for the Bosch BMI260 6-axis IMU to the Bosch BMI270
>> driver. Setup and operation is nearly identical to the Bosch BMI270,
>> but has a different chip ID and requires different firmware.
>>
>> Firmware is requested and loaded from userspace.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Weiss <justin@justinweiss.com>
> Trivial comments inline and a discussion on whether my earlier
> don't use an array comment makes sense in this particular case.
>
> Jonathan
>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h | 1 +
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> index 2e8d85a4e419..51e374fd4290 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct bmi270_data {
>> };
>>
>> enum bmi270_device_type {
>> + BMI260,
>> BMI270,
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c
>> index 799df78ec862..b30201dc4e22 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_core.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
>> #include "bmi270.h"
>>
>> #define BMI270_CHIP_ID_REG 0x00
>> +#define BMI160_CHIP_ID_VAL 0xD1
>
> This one looks like a cut and paste error.
No, this was intentional -- I added the BMI160 chip ID here so it could
be checked later to avoid conflicting with the existing bmi160 driver. I
could add newlines before and after this group of _ID_VAL #defines if it
makes it clearer.
>> +#define BMI260_CHIP_ID_VAL 0x27
>> #define BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL 0x24
>> #define BMI270_CHIP_ID_MSK GENMASK(7, 0)
>>
>> @@ -55,6 +57,7 @@
>> #define BMI270_PWR_CTRL_ACCEL_EN_MSK BIT(2)
>> #define BMI270_PWR_CTRL_TEMP_EN_MSK BIT(3)
>>
>> +#define BMI260_INIT_DATA_FILE "bmi260-init-data.fw"
>> #define BMI270_INIT_DATA_FILE "bmi270-init-data.fw"
>>
>> enum bmi270_scan {
>> @@ -67,6 +70,11 @@ enum bmi270_scan {
>> };
>>
>> const struct bmi270_chip_info bmi270_chip_info[] = {
>> + [BMI260] = {
>> + .name = "bmi260",
>> + .chip_id = BMI260_CHIP_ID_VAL,
>> + .fw_name = BMI260_INIT_DATA_FILE,
>> + },
>> [BMI270] = {
>> .name = "bmi270",
>> .chip_id = BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL,
>> @@ -163,8 +171,21 @@ static int bmi270_validate_chip_id(struct bmi270_data *bmi270_device)
>> if (ret)
>> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to read chip id");
>>
>> - if (chip_id != BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL)
>> - dev_info(dev, "Unknown chip id 0x%x", chip_id);
>> + /*
>> + * Some manufacturers use "BMI0160" for both the BMI160 and
>> + * BMI260. If the device is actually a BMI160, the bmi160
>> + * driver should handle it and this driver should not.
>> + */
>> + if (chip_id == BMI160_CHIP_ID_VAL)
>> + return -ENODEV;
This is where that BMI160 chip ID is checked.
>> +
>> + if (chip_id != bmi270_device->chip_info->chip_id)
>> + dev_info(dev, "Unexpected chip id 0x%x", chip_id);
>> +
>> + if (chip_id == BMI260_CHIP_ID_VAL)
>
> Ah. My argument on separate IDs means you'd have to do it this way whereas
> I was thinking maybe a loop would be a better idea. Ah well if we
> get a lot of supported chips, then we can rethink how to handle this.
> For now what you have here is fine and should deal with lack of appropriate
> ACPI ID mess.
I like the idea of separate structures, so I'll keep the if / else
here. I think it would be straightforward to change later without
conflicts if there are more supported chips.
I will change this to check against bmi260_chip_info.chip_id,
etc. instead of the constants, to make sure they stay consistent.
Justin
>> + bmi270_device->chip_info = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI260];
>> + else if (chip_id == BMI270_CHIP_ID_VAL)
>> + bmi270_device->chip_info = &bmi270_chip_info[BMI270];
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
> >> #define BMI270_CHIP_ID_REG 0x00 > >> +#define BMI160_CHIP_ID_VAL 0xD1 > > > > This one looks like a cut and paste error. > > No, this was intentional -- I added the BMI160 chip ID here so it could > be checked later to avoid conflicting with the existing bmi160 driver. I > could add newlines before and after this group of _ID_VAL #defines if it > makes it clearer. Got it. Just add a comment that it's to exclude known bad firmwares and that is fine to keep.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.