The complexity of config guards needed for ACPI_PTR() is not worthwhile
for the small amount of saved data. This example was doing it correctly
but I am proposing dropping this so as to reduce chance of cut and paste
where it is done wrong.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c
index ae592528001d..64184d4bd894 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xgene-sb.c
@@ -304,20 +304,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id xgene_gpio_sb_of_match[] = {
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, xgene_gpio_sb_of_match);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 static const struct acpi_device_id xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match[] = {
 	{"APMC0D15", 0},
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match);
-#endif
 
 static struct platform_driver xgene_gpio_sb_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		   .name = "xgene-gpio-sb",
 		   .of_match_table = xgene_gpio_sb_of_match,
-		   .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match),
-		   },
+		   .acpi_match_table = xgene_gpio_sb_acpi_match,
+	},
 	.probe = xgene_gpio_sb_probe,
 	.remove = xgene_gpio_sb_remove,
 };
-- 
2.43.0.rc1.1336.g36b5255a03ac