1. Patchew
  2. linux
  3. [PATCH v1 0/4] Enable UFS on QCS615
  4. View patch

[PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: add UFS node

Xin Liu posted 4 patches 1 year, 3 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: add UFS node
Posted by Xin Liu 1 year, 3 months ago 
From: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>	
	
Add the UFS Host Controller node and its PHY for QCS615 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>
Co-developed-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
index fcba83fca7cf..689418466dc2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
@@ -458,6 +458,80 @@ mmss_noc: interconnect@1740000 {
 			qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
 		};
 
+		ufs_mem_hc: ufs@1d84000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
+			reg = <0x0 0x01d84000 0x0 0x3000>, <0x0 0x01d90000 0x0 0x8000>;
+			reg-names = "std", "ice";
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy>;
+			phy-names = "ufsphy";
+			lanes-per-direction = <1>;
+			#reset-cells = <1>;
+			resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
+			reset-names = "rst";
+
+			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
+			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
+
+			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x300 0x0>;
+			dma-coherent;
+
+			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_UFS_MEM QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
+					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
+					<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
+					 &config_noc SLAVE_UFS_MEM_CFG QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
+			interconnect-names = "ufs-ddr",
+					     "cpu-ufs";
+
+			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
+				 <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
+			clock-names = "core_clk",
+				      "bus_aggr_clk",
+				      "iface_clk",
+				      "core_clk_unipro",
+				      "ref_clk",
+				      "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
+				      "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
+				      "ice_core_clk";
+			freq-table-hz = <50000000 200000000>,
+					<0 0>,
+					<0 0>,
+					<37500000 150000000>,
+					<0 0>,
+					<0 0>,
+					<0 0>,
+					<75000000 300000000>;
+
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
+		ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-qmp-ufs-phy", "qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy";
+			reg = <0x0 0x01d87000 0x0 0xe00>;
+			clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>;
+			clock-names = "ref",
+				      "ref_aux",
+				      "qref";
+
+			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
+
+			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
+			reset-names = "ufsphy";
+
+			#clock-cells = <1>;
+			#phy-cells = <0>;
+
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
 		tcsr_mutex: hwlock@1f40000 {
 			compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex";
 			reg = <0x0 0x01f40000 0x0 0x20000>;
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: add UFS node
Posted by Konrad Dybcio 1 year, 3 months ago 
On 17.10.2024 6:22 AM, Xin Liu wrote:
> From: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>	
> 	
> Add the UFS Host Controller node and its PHY for QCS615 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
> ---

+ Taniya (see below)

>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
> index fcba83fca7cf..689418466dc2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
> @@ -458,6 +458,80 @@ mmss_noc: interconnect@1740000 {
>  			qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
>  		};
>  
> +		ufs_mem_hc: ufs@1d84000 {

ufshc@ would be consistent with other files in dts/qcom


> +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> +			reg = <0x0 0x01d84000 0x0 0x3000>, <0x0 0x01d90000 0x0 0x8000>;
> +			reg-names = "std", "ice";

One per line, please

> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy>;
> +			phy-names = "ufsphy";
> +			lanes-per-direction = <1>;
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
> +			reset-names = "rst";
> +
> +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
> +
> +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x300 0x0>;
> +			dma-coherent;
> +
> +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_UFS_MEM QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> +					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> +					<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> +					 &config_noc SLAVE_UFS_MEM_CFG QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
> +			interconnect-names = "ufs-ddr",
> +					     "cpu-ufs";
> +
> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
> +				 <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "core_clk",
> +				      "bus_aggr_clk",
> +				      "iface_clk",
> +				      "core_clk_unipro",
> +				      "ref_clk",
> +				      "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
> +				      "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
> +				      "ice_core_clk";
> +			freq-table-hz = <50000000 200000000>,
> +					<0 0>,
> +					<0 0>,
> +					<37500000 150000000>,
> +					<0 0>,
> +					<0 0>,
> +					<0 0>,
> +					<75000000 300000000>;

Please try to match the order of properties present in sm8650.dtsi

And please use an OPP table instead of freq-table-hz (see sm8*5*50.dtsi)

> +
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +
> +		ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-qmp-ufs-phy", "qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy";
> +			reg = <0x0 0x01d87000 0x0 0xe00>;

This register region is a bit longer

> +			clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "ref",
> +				      "ref_aux",
> +				      "qref";
> +
> +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> +
> +			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
> +			reset-names = "ufsphy";
> +
> +			#clock-cells = <1>;

The PHY is a clock provider. Normally, it's a parent of
gcc_ufs_phy_[rt]x_symbol_n clocks.

Taniya, could you please wire that up in your patchset?

Konrad
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: add UFS node
Posted by Xin Liu 1 year, 2 months ago 

在 2024/10/26 3:24, Konrad Dybcio 写道:
> On 17.10.2024 6:22 AM, Xin Liu wrote:
>> From: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>	
>> 	
>> Add the UFS Host Controller node and its PHY for QCS615 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
>> ---
> 
> + Taniya (see below)
> 
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
>> index fcba83fca7cf..689418466dc2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
>> @@ -458,6 +458,80 @@ mmss_noc: interconnect@1740000 {
>>   			qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
>>   		};
>>   
>> +		ufs_mem_hc: ufs@1d84000 {
> 
> ufshc@ would be consistent with other files in dts/qcom
> 
I referred to qcom files such as sa8775p/sm8550/sm8650 etc.All use ufs@
> 
>> +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>> +			reg = <0x0 0x01d84000 0x0 0x3000>, <0x0 0x01d90000 0x0 0x8000>;
>> +			reg-names = "std", "ice";
> 
> One per line, please
Thank you, I will fix it next version.
> 
>> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy>;
>> +			phy-names = "ufsphy";
>> +			lanes-per-direction = <1>;
>> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
>> +			resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
>> +			reset-names = "rst";
>> +
>> +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
>> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
>> +
>> +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x300 0x0>;
>> +			dma-coherent;
>> +
>> +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_UFS_MEM QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
>> +					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
>> +					<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
>> +					 &config_noc SLAVE_UFS_MEM_CFG QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
>> +			interconnect-names = "ufs-ddr",
>> +					     "cpu-ufs";
>> +
>> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
>> +				 <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
>> +			clock-names = "core_clk",
>> +				      "bus_aggr_clk",
>> +				      "iface_clk",
>> +				      "core_clk_unipro",
>> +				      "ref_clk",
>> +				      "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
>> +				      "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
>> +				      "ice_core_clk";
>> +			freq-table-hz = <50000000 200000000>,
>> +					<0 0>,
>> +					<0 0>,
>> +					<37500000 150000000>,
>> +					<0 0>,
>> +					<0 0>,
>> +					<0 0>,
>> +					<75000000 300000000>;
> 
> Please try to match the order of properties present in sm8650.dtsi
Thank you, I will fix it next version.
> 
> And please use an OPP table instead of freq-table-hz (see sm8*5*50.dtsi)
Thank you, I will fix it next version.
> 
>> +
>> +			status = "disabled";
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-qmp-ufs-phy", "qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy";
>> +			reg = <0x0 0x01d87000 0x0 0xe00>;
> 
> This register region is a bit longer
I just confirmed again, there's no problem here.
> 
>> +			clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>;
>> +			clock-names = "ref",
>> +				      "ref_aux",
>> +				      "qref";
>> +
>> +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
>> +
>> +			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
>> +			reset-names = "ufsphy";
>> +
>> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> 
> The PHY is a clock provider. Normally, it's a parent of
> gcc_ufs_phy_[rt]x_symbol_n clocks.
> 
> Taniya, could you please wire that up in your patchset?
> 
> Konrad
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: add UFS node
Posted by Manivannan Sadhasivam 1 year, 2 months ago 
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 05:19:49PM +0800, Xin Liu wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2024/10/26 3:24, Konrad Dybcio 写道:
> > On 17.10.2024 6:22 AM, Xin Liu wrote:
> > > From: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>	
> > > 	
> > > Add the UFS Host Controller node and its PHY for QCS615 SoC.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>
> > > Co-developed-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > + Taniya (see below)
> > 
> > >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
> > > index fcba83fca7cf..689418466dc2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
> > > @@ -458,6 +458,80 @@ mmss_noc: interconnect@1740000 {
> > >   			qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
> > >   		};
> > > +		ufs_mem_hc: ufs@1d84000 {
> > 
> > ufshc@ would be consistent with other files in dts/qcom
> > 
> I referred to qcom files such as sa8775p/sm8550/sm8650 etc.All use ufs@

That's an oddity. But 'ufshc' is documented in the devicetree spec. So you
should use it for UFSHC nodes.

- Mani

> > 
> > > +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> > > +			reg = <0x0 0x01d84000 0x0 0x3000>, <0x0 0x01d90000 0x0 0x8000>;
> > > +			reg-names = "std", "ice";
> > 
> > One per line, please
> Thank you, I will fix it next version.
> > 
> > > +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > +			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy>;
> > > +			phy-names = "ufsphy";
> > > +			lanes-per-direction = <1>;
> > > +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> > > +			resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
> > > +			reset-names = "rst";
> > > +
> > > +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> > > +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
> > > +
> > > +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x300 0x0>;
> > > +			dma-coherent;
> > > +
> > > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_UFS_MEM QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> > > +					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> > > +					<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> > > +					 &config_noc SLAVE_UFS_MEM_CFG QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
> > > +			interconnect-names = "ufs-ddr",
> > > +					     "cpu-ufs";
> > > +
> > > +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> > > +				 <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> > > +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
> > > +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
> > > +				 <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> > > +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> > > +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> > > +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
> > > +			clock-names = "core_clk",
> > > +				      "bus_aggr_clk",
> > > +				      "iface_clk",
> > > +				      "core_clk_unipro",
> > > +				      "ref_clk",
> > > +				      "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
> > > +				      "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
> > > +				      "ice_core_clk";
> > > +			freq-table-hz = <50000000 200000000>,
> > > +					<0 0>,
> > > +					<0 0>,
> > > +					<37500000 150000000>,
> > > +					<0 0>,
> > > +					<0 0>,
> > > +					<0 0>,
> > > +					<75000000 300000000>;
> > 
> > Please try to match the order of properties present in sm8650.dtsi
> Thank you, I will fix it next version.
> > 
> > And please use an OPP table instead of freq-table-hz (see sm8*5*50.dtsi)
> Thank you, I will fix it next version.
> > 
> > > +
> > > +			status = "disabled";
> > > +		};
> > > +
> > > +		ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
> > > +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-qmp-ufs-phy", "qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy";
> > > +			reg = <0x0 0x01d87000 0x0 0xe00>;
> > 
> > This register region is a bit longer
> I just confirmed again, there's no problem here.
> > 
> > > +			clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> > > +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>,
> > > +				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>;
> > > +			clock-names = "ref",
> > > +				      "ref_aux",
> > > +				      "qref";
> > > +
> > > +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> > > +
> > > +			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
> > > +			reset-names = "ufsphy";
> > > +
> > > +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> > 
> > The PHY is a clock provider. Normally, it's a parent of
> > gcc_ufs_phy_[rt]x_symbol_n clocks.
> > 
> > Taniya, could you please wire that up in your patchset?
> > 
> > Konrad
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: add UFS node
Posted by Konrad Dybcio 1 year, 2 months ago 
On 13.11.2024 10:27 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 05:19:49PM +0800, Xin Liu wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2024/10/26 3:24, Konrad Dybcio 写道:
>>> On 17.10.2024 6:22 AM, Xin Liu wrote:
>>>> From: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>	
>>>> 	
>>>> Add the UFS Host Controller node and its PHY for QCS615 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>
>>>> Co-developed-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---

[...]


>>>> +
>>>> +			status = "disabled";
>>>> +		};
>>>> +
>>>> +		ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
>>>> +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-qmp-ufs-phy", "qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy";
>>>> +			reg = <0x0 0x01d87000 0x0 0xe00>;
>>>
>>> This register region is a bit longer
>> I just confirmed again, there's no problem here.

I'd happen to disagree, please make it 0xe10-long

Konrad
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: add UFS node
Posted by Konrad Dybcio 1 year, 2 months ago 
On 14.11.2024 4:20 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 13.11.2024 10:27 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 05:19:49PM +0800, Xin Liu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 在 2024/10/26 3:24, Konrad Dybcio 写道:
>>>> On 17.10.2024 6:22 AM, Xin Liu wrote:
>>>>> From: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>	
>>>>> 	
>>>>> Add the UFS Host Controller node and its PHY for QCS615 SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande <quic_sayalil@quicinc.com>
>>>>> Co-developed-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <quic_liuxin@quicinc.com>
>>>>> ---
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
>>>>> +
>>>>> +			status = "disabled";
>>>>> +		};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +		ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
>>>>> +			compatible = "qcom,qcs615-qmp-ufs-phy", "qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy";
>>>>> +			reg = <0x0 0x01d87000 0x0 0xe00>;
>>>>
>>>> This register region is a bit longer
>>> I just confirmed again, there's no problem here.
> 
> I'd happen to disagree, please make it 0xe10-long

Ignore, I was looking at the wrong SoC. Sorry.

Konrad

Patchew 2.1-devel-b67e4c2

© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.