[PATCH v4] iio: adc: pac1921: Add ACPI support to Microchip pac1921

victor.duicu@microchip.com posted 1 patch 1 month, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
[PATCH v4] iio: adc: pac1921: Add ACPI support to Microchip pac1921
Posted by victor.duicu@microchip.com 1 month, 1 week ago
From: Victor Duicu <victor.duicu@microchip.com>

This patch implements ACPI support to Microchip pac1921.
The driver can read shunt resistor value and label from ACPI table.

Signed-off-by: Victor Duicu <victor.duicu@microchip.com>
---

The patch was tested on minnowboard and sama5.

Differences related to previous versions:
v4:
- change name of pac1921_shunt_is_valid to pac1921_shunt_is_invalid.
- fix coding style.
- in pac1921_parse_of_fw change back to device_property_read_u32.

v3:
- simplify and make inline function pac1921_shunt_is_valid. Make argument u64.
- fix link to DSM documentation.
- in pac1921_match_acpi_device and pac1921_parse_of_fw, the shunt value is
read as u64.
- in pac1921_parse_of_fw remove code for reading label value from
devicetree.
- in pac1921_write_shunt_resistor cast the multiply result to u64 in order
to fix overflow.

v2:
- remove name variable from priv. Driver reads label attribute with
sysfs.
- define pac1921_shunt_is_valid function.
- move default assignments in pac1921_probe to original position.
- roll back coding style changes.
- add documentation for DSM(the linked document was used as reference).
- remove acpi_match_device in pac1921_match_acpi_device.
- remove unnecessary null assignment and comment.
- change name of function pac1921_match_of_device to
pac1921_parse_of_fw.

v1:
- initial version for review.

 drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c b/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c
index a96fae546bc1..8b5127b7ee3c 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c
@@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ enum pac1921_mxsl {
 #define PAC1921_DEFAULT_DI_GAIN		0 /* 2^(value): 1x gain (HW default) */
 #define PAC1921_DEFAULT_NUM_SAMPLES	0 /* 2^(value): 1 sample (HW default) */
 
+#define PAC1921_ACPI_GET_UOHMS_VALS             0
+#define PAC1921_ACPI_GET_LABEL			1
+#define PAC1921_DSM_UUID                        "f7bb9932-86ee-4516-a236-7a7a742e55cb"
+
 /*
  * Pre-computed scale factors for BUS voltage
  * format: IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO
@@ -204,6 +208,11 @@ struct pac1921_priv {
 	} scan;
 };
 
+static inline bool pac1921_shunt_is_invalid(u64 shunt_val)
+{
+	return (shunt_val == 0 || shunt_val > INT_MAX);
+}
+
 /*
  * Check if first integration after configuration update has completed.
  *
@@ -792,13 +801,13 @@ static ssize_t pac1921_write_shunt_resistor(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	rshunt_uohm = val * MICRO + val_fract;
-	if (rshunt_uohm == 0 || rshunt_uohm > INT_MAX)
+	rshunt_uohm = (u64)val * MICRO + val_fract;
+	if (pac1921_shunt_is_invalid(rshunt_uohm))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
 
-	priv->rshunt_uohm = rshunt_uohm;
+	priv->rshunt_uohm = (u32)rshunt_uohm;
 
 	pac1921_calc_current_scales(priv);
 
@@ -1150,6 +1159,71 @@ static void pac1921_regulator_disable(void *data)
 	regulator_disable(regulator);
 }
 
+/*
+ * documentation related to the ACPI device definition
+ * https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/OTH/ApplicationNotes/ApplicationNotes/PAC193X-Integration-Notes-for-Microsoft-Windows-10-and-Windows-11-Driver-Support-DS00002534.pdf
+ */
+static int pac1921_match_acpi_device(struct i2c_client *client, struct pac1921_priv *priv,
+				     struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
+{
+	acpi_handle handle;
+	union acpi_object *rez;
+	guid_t guid;
+	char *label;
+	u64 temp;
+
+	guid_parse(PAC1921_DSM_UUID, &guid);
+	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&client->dev);
+
+	rez = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, &guid, 1, PAC1921_ACPI_GET_UOHMS_VALS, NULL);
+	if (!rez)
+		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, -EINVAL,
+				     "Could not read shunt from ACPI table\n");
+
+	temp = rez->package.elements[0].integer.value;
+	ACPI_FREE(rez);
+
+	if (pac1921_shunt_is_invalid(temp))
+		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, -EINVAL, "Invalid shunt resistor\n");
+
+	priv->rshunt_uohm = temp;
+	pac1921_calc_current_scales(priv);
+
+	rez = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, &guid, 1, PAC1921_ACPI_GET_LABEL, NULL);
+	if (!rez)
+		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, -EINVAL,
+				     "Could not read label from ACPI table\n");
+
+	label = devm_kmemdup(&client->dev, rez->package.elements->string.pointer,
+			     (size_t)rez->package.elements->string.length + 1,
+			     GFP_KERNEL);
+	label[rez->package.elements->string.length] = '\0';
+	indio_dev->label = label;
+	ACPI_FREE(rez);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int pac1921_parse_of_fw(struct i2c_client *client, struct pac1921_priv *priv)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
+
+	ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "shunt-resistor-micro-ohms",
+				       &priv->rshunt_uohm);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
+				     "Cannot read shunt resistor property\n");
+
+	if (pac1921_shunt_is_invalid(priv->rshunt_uohm))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Invalid shunt resistor: %u\n",
+				     priv->rshunt_uohm);
+
+	pac1921_calc_current_scales(priv);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int pac1921_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
@@ -1176,17 +1250,13 @@ static int pac1921_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 	priv->di_gain = PAC1921_DEFAULT_DI_GAIN;
 	priv->n_samples = PAC1921_DEFAULT_NUM_SAMPLES;
 
-	ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "shunt-resistor-micro-ohms",
-				       &priv->rshunt_uohm);
-	if (ret)
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
-				     "Cannot read shunt resistor property\n");
-	if (priv->rshunt_uohm == 0 || priv->rshunt_uohm > INT_MAX)
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
-				     "Invalid shunt resistor: %u\n",
-				     priv->rshunt_uohm);
-
-	pac1921_calc_current_scales(priv);
+	if (ACPI_HANDLE(&client->dev))
+		ret = pac1921_match_acpi_device(client, priv, indio_dev);
+	else
+		ret = pac1921_parse_of_fw(client, priv);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
+				     "parameter parsing error\n");
 
 	priv->vdd = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdd");
 	if (IS_ERR(priv->vdd))
@@ -1243,11 +1313,17 @@ static const struct of_device_id pac1921_of_match[] = {
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pac1921_of_match);
 
+static const struct acpi_device_id pac1921_acpi_match[] = {
+	{ "MCHP1921" },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, pac1921_acpi_match);
 static struct i2c_driver pac1921_driver = {
 	.driver	 = {
 		.name = "pac1921",
 		.pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&pac1921_pm_ops),
 		.of_match_table = pac1921_of_match,
+		.acpi_match_table = pac1921_acpi_match
 	},
 	.probe = pac1921_probe,
 	.id_table = pac1921_id,

base-commit: c3e9df514041ec6c46be83801b1891392f4522f7
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH v4] iio: adc: pac1921: Add ACPI support to Microchip pac1921
Posted by Matteo Martelli 1 month, 1 week ago
Quoting victor.duicu@microchip.com (2024-10-15 13:24:41)
> From: Victor Duicu <victor.duicu@microchip.com>
> 
> This patch implements ACPI support to Microchip pac1921.
> The driver can read shunt resistor value and label from ACPI table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Victor Duicu <victor.duicu@microchip.com>
> ---
> 
> The patch was tested on minnowboard and sama5.
> 
> Differences related to previous versions:
> v4:
> - change name of pac1921_shunt_is_valid to pac1921_shunt_is_invalid.
> - fix coding style.
> - in pac1921_parse_of_fw change back to device_property_read_u32.
> 
> v3:
> - simplify and make inline function pac1921_shunt_is_valid. Make argument u64.
> - fix link to DSM documentation.
> - in pac1921_match_acpi_device and pac1921_parse_of_fw, the shunt value is
> read as u64.
> - in pac1921_parse_of_fw remove code for reading label value from
> devicetree.
> - in pac1921_write_shunt_resistor cast the multiply result to u64 in order
> to fix overflow.
> 
> v2:
> - remove name variable from priv. Driver reads label attribute with
> sysfs.
> - define pac1921_shunt_is_valid function.
> - move default assignments in pac1921_probe to original position.
> - roll back coding style changes.
> - add documentation for DSM(the linked document was used as reference).
> - remove acpi_match_device in pac1921_match_acpi_device.
> - remove unnecessary null assignment and comment.
> - change name of function pac1921_match_of_device to
> pac1921_parse_of_fw.
> 
> v1:
> - initial version for review.
> 
>  drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c b/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c
> index a96fae546bc1..8b5127b7ee3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ enum pac1921_mxsl {
>  #define PAC1921_DEFAULT_DI_GAIN                0 /* 2^(value): 1x gain (HW default) */
>  #define PAC1921_DEFAULT_NUM_SAMPLES    0 /* 2^(value): 1 sample (HW default) */
>  
> +#define PAC1921_ACPI_GET_UOHMS_VALS             0
> +#define PAC1921_ACPI_GET_LABEL                 1
> +#define PAC1921_DSM_UUID                        "f7bb9932-86ee-4516-a236-7a7a742e55cb"
> +
>  /*
>   * Pre-computed scale factors for BUS voltage
>   * format: IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO
> @@ -204,6 +208,11 @@ struct pac1921_priv {
>         } scan;
>  };
>  
> +static inline bool pac1921_shunt_is_invalid(u64 shunt_val)
> +{
> +       return (shunt_val == 0 || shunt_val > INT_MAX);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Check if first integration after configuration update has completed.
>   *
> @@ -792,13 +801,13 @@ static ssize_t pac1921_write_shunt_resistor(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>  
> -       rshunt_uohm = val * MICRO + val_fract;
> -       if (rshunt_uohm == 0 || rshunt_uohm > INT_MAX)
> +       rshunt_uohm = (u64)val * MICRO + val_fract;
> +       if (pac1921_shunt_is_invalid(rshunt_uohm))
>                 return -EINVAL;
>  
>         guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
>  
> -       priv->rshunt_uohm = rshunt_uohm;
> +       priv->rshunt_uohm = (u32)rshunt_uohm;

This explicit cast seems unnecessary (note the similar assignment in the
pac1921_match_acpi_device() that doesn't use the explicit cast).

Beside that the rest of the patch looks good to me.

Acked-by: Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@gmail.com>

Best regards,
Matteo Martelli