As Maxime suggested, add a new helper
drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic(), it can replace
the direct call of drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(), and it will
help solving the `mode` memory leaks.
Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++
include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h | 6 ++++
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c
index aa62719dab0e..dc70bafcd394 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c
@@ -311,6 +311,46 @@ drm_kunit_helper_create_crtc(struct kunit *test,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_kunit_helper_create_crtc);
+static void kunit_action_drm_mode_destroy(void *ptr)
+{
+ struct drm_display_mode *mode = ptr;
+
+ drm_mode_destroy(NULL, mode);
+}
+
+/**
+ * drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic() - return a mode for CEA VIC
+ for a KUnit test
+ * @test: The test context object
+ * @dev: DRM device
+ * @video_code: CEA VIC of the mode
+ *
+ * Creates a new mode matching the specified CEA VIC for a KUnit test.
+ *
+ * Resources will be cleaned up automatically.
+ *
+ * Returns: A new drm_display_mode on success or NULL on failure
+ */
+struct drm_display_mode *
+drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic(struct kunit *test,
+ struct drm_device *dev,
+ u8 video_code)
+{
+ struct drm_display_mode *mode;
+ int ret;
+
+ mode = drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(dev, video_code);
+
+ ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test,
+ kunit_action_drm_mode_destroy,
+ mode);
+ if (ret)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return mode;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic);
+
MODULE_AUTHOR("Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit test suite helper functions");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h b/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h
index e7cc17ee4934..1e7fd4be550c 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#define DRM_KUNIT_HELPERS_H_
#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
+#include <drm/drm_edid.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
@@ -120,4 +121,9 @@ drm_kunit_helper_create_crtc(struct kunit *test,
const struct drm_crtc_funcs *funcs,
const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs *helper_funcs);
+struct drm_display_mode *
+drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic(struct kunit *test,
+ struct drm_device *dev,
+ u8 video_code);
+
#endif // DRM_KUNIT_HELPERS_H_
--
2.34.1
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:52:01PM GMT, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> As Maxime suggested, add a new helper
> drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic(), it can replace
> the direct call of drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(), and it will
> help solving the `mode` memory leaks.
>
> Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h | 6 ++++
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c
> index aa62719dab0e..dc70bafcd394 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c
> @@ -311,6 +311,46 @@ drm_kunit_helper_create_crtc(struct kunit *test,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_kunit_helper_create_crtc);
>
> +static void kunit_action_drm_mode_destroy(void *ptr)
> +{
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode = ptr;
> +
> + drm_mode_destroy(NULL, mode);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic() - return a mode for CEA VIC
> + for a KUnit test
> + * @test: The test context object
> + * @dev: DRM device
> + * @video_code: CEA VIC of the mode
> + *
> + * Creates a new mode matching the specified CEA VIC for a KUnit test.
> + *
> + * Resources will be cleaned up automatically.
> + *
> + * Returns: A new drm_display_mode on success or NULL on failure
> + */
> +struct drm_display_mode *
> +drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic(struct kunit *test,
> + struct drm_device *dev,
> + u8 video_code)
> +{
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mode = drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(dev, video_code);
> +
> + ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test,
> + kunit_action_drm_mode_destroy,
> + mode);
> + if (ret)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return mode;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic);
> +
I think you can drop the "helper" name there, it's usually reserved for
blanket implementation of DRM hooks. This one isn't a hook, so just
calling it drm_kunit_display_mode_from_cea_vic makes a bit more sense to
me.
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit test suite helper functions");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h b/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h
> index e7cc17ee4934..1e7fd4be550c 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> #define DRM_KUNIT_HELPERS_H_
>
> #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_edid.h>
>
> #include <linux/device.h>
>
> @@ -120,4 +121,9 @@ drm_kunit_helper_create_crtc(struct kunit *test,
> const struct drm_crtc_funcs *funcs,
> const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs *helper_funcs);
>
> +struct drm_display_mode *
> +drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic(struct kunit *test,
> + struct drm_device *dev,
> + u8 video_code);
It's not clear to me what you need the drm_edid header, you just return
a drm_display_mode pointer so you can just forward declare the structure
Once fixed
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Maxime
On 2024/10/16 17:35, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:52:01PM GMT, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> As Maxime suggested, add a new helper
>> drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic(), it can replace
>> the direct call of drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(), and it will
>> help solving the `mode` memory leaks.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h | 6 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c
>> index aa62719dab0e..dc70bafcd394 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c
>> @@ -311,6 +311,46 @@ drm_kunit_helper_create_crtc(struct kunit *test,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_kunit_helper_create_crtc);
>>
>> +static void kunit_action_drm_mode_destroy(void *ptr)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_display_mode *mode = ptr;
>> +
>> + drm_mode_destroy(NULL, mode);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic() - return a mode for CEA VIC
>> + for a KUnit test
>> + * @test: The test context object
>> + * @dev: DRM device
>> + * @video_code: CEA VIC of the mode
>> + *
>> + * Creates a new mode matching the specified CEA VIC for a KUnit test.
>> + *
>> + * Resources will be cleaned up automatically.
>> + *
>> + * Returns: A new drm_display_mode on success or NULL on failure
>> + */
>> +struct drm_display_mode *
>> +drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic(struct kunit *test,
>> + struct drm_device *dev,
>> + u8 video_code)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_display_mode *mode;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + mode = drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(dev, video_code);
>> +
>> + ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test,
>> + kunit_action_drm_mode_destroy,
>> + mode);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + return mode;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic);
>> +
>
> I think you can drop the "helper" name there, it's usually reserved for
> blanket implementation of DRM hooks. This one isn't a hook, so just
> calling it drm_kunit_display_mode_from_cea_vic makes a bit more sense to
> me.
>
>> MODULE_AUTHOR("Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>");
>> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit test suite helper functions");
>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h b/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h
>> index e7cc17ee4934..1e7fd4be550c 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>> #define DRM_KUNIT_HELPERS_H_
>>
>> #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_edid.h>
>>
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>>
>> @@ -120,4 +121,9 @@ drm_kunit_helper_create_crtc(struct kunit *test,
>> const struct drm_crtc_funcs *funcs,
>> const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs *helper_funcs);
>>
>> +struct drm_display_mode *
>> +drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic(struct kunit *test,
>> + struct drm_device *dev,
>> + u8 video_code);
>
> It's not clear to me what you need the drm_edid header, you just return
> a drm_display_mode pointer so you can just forward declare the structure
There is a compile error without the header,because there is no
"drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic()" declare.
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c:341:16: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic’; did you mean
‘drm_kunit_display_mode_from_cea_vic’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
341 | mode = drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(dev, video_code);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| drm_kunit_display_mode_from_cea_vic
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c:341:14: warning: assignment to
‘struct drm_display_mode *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer
without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
341 | mode = drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(dev, video_code);
| ^
>
> Once fixed
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
>
> Maxime
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 09:33:07AM GMT, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > >> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h b/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h > >> index e7cc17ee4934..1e7fd4be550c 100644 > >> --- a/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h > >> +++ b/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h > >> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > >> #define DRM_KUNIT_HELPERS_H_ > >> > >> #include <drm/drm_drv.h> > >> +#include <drm/drm_edid.h> > >> > >> #include <linux/device.h> > >> > >> @@ -120,4 +121,9 @@ drm_kunit_helper_create_crtc(struct kunit *test, > >> const struct drm_crtc_funcs *funcs, > >> const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs *helper_funcs); > >> > >> +struct drm_display_mode * > >> +drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic(struct kunit *test, > >> + struct drm_device *dev, > >> + u8 video_code); > > > > It's not clear to me what you need the drm_edid header, you just return > > a drm_display_mode pointer so you can just forward declare the structure > > > There is a compile error without the header,because there is no > "drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic()" declare. > > drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c:341:16: error: implicit > declaration of function ‘drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic’; did you mean > ‘drm_kunit_display_mode_from_cea_vic’? > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 341 | mode = drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(dev, video_code); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | drm_kunit_display_mode_from_cea_vic > drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c:341:14: warning: assignment to > ‘struct drm_display_mode *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer > without a cast [-Wint-conversion] > 341 | mode = drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(dev, video_code); > | ^ Right, but the error is in the C file, not the header. Maxime
On 2024/10/17 20:13, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 09:33:07AM GMT, Jinjie Ruan wrote: >>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h b/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h >>>> index e7cc17ee4934..1e7fd4be550c 100644 >>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h >>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h >>>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ >>>> #define DRM_KUNIT_HELPERS_H_ >>>> >>>> #include <drm/drm_drv.h> >>>> +#include <drm/drm_edid.h> >>>> >>>> #include <linux/device.h> >>>> >>>> @@ -120,4 +121,9 @@ drm_kunit_helper_create_crtc(struct kunit *test, >>>> const struct drm_crtc_funcs *funcs, >>>> const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs *helper_funcs); >>>> >>>> +struct drm_display_mode * >>>> +drm_kunit_helper_display_mode_from_cea_vic(struct kunit *test, >>>> + struct drm_device *dev, >>>> + u8 video_code); >>> >>> It's not clear to me what you need the drm_edid header, you just return >>> a drm_display_mode pointer so you can just forward declare the structure >> >> >> There is a compile error without the header,because there is no >> "drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic()" declare. >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c:341:16: error: implicit >> declaration of function ‘drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic’; did you mean >> ‘drm_kunit_display_mode_from_cea_vic’? >> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> 341 | mode = drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(dev, video_code); >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> | drm_kunit_display_mode_from_cea_vic >> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c:341:14: warning: assignment to >> ‘struct drm_display_mode *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer >> without a cast [-Wint-conversion] >> 341 | mode = drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic(dev, video_code); >> | ^ > > Right, but the error is in the C file, not the header. Yes, I have updated it to C file in V3, thank you! > > Maxime
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.