drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
of_find_compatible_node() increments the node's refcount, and it must be
decremented again with a call to of_node_put() when the pointer is no
longer required to avoid leaking memory.
Add the missing calls to of_node_put() in dmtimer_percpu_quirck_init()
for the 'arm_timer' device node.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 25de4ce5ed02 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Handle dra7 timer wrap errata i940")
Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
---
drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
index c2dcd8d68e45..23be1d21ce21 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c
@@ -691,8 +691,10 @@ static int __init dmtimer_percpu_quirk_init(struct device_node *np, u32 pa)
arm_timer = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,armv7-timer");
if (of_device_is_available(arm_timer)) {
pr_warn_once("ARM architected timer wrap issue i940 detected\n");
+ of_node_put(arm_timer);
return 0;
}
+ of_node_put(arm_timer);
if (pa == 0x4882c000) /* dra7 dmtimer15 */
return dmtimer_percpu_timer_init(np, 0);
---
base-commit: d61a00525464bfc5fe92c6ad713350988e492b88
change-id: 20241013-timer-ti-dm-systimer-of_node_put-d42735687698
Best regards,
--
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Hi Javier, thanks for spotting the issue On 13/10/2024 12:14, Javier Carrasco wrote: > of_find_compatible_node() increments the node's refcount, and it must be > decremented again with a call to of_node_put() when the pointer is no > longer required to avoid leaking memory. > > Add the missing calls to of_node_put() in dmtimer_percpu_quirck_init() > for the 'arm_timer' device node. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Fixes: 25de4ce5ed02 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Handle dra7 timer wrap errata i940") > Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c > index c2dcd8d68e45..23be1d21ce21 100644 > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c > @@ -691,8 +691,10 @@ static int __init dmtimer_percpu_quirk_init(struct device_node *np, u32 pa) > arm_timer = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,armv7-timer"); > if (of_device_is_available(arm_timer)) { > pr_warn_once("ARM architected timer wrap issue i940 detected\n"); > + of_node_put(arm_timer); > return 0; > } > + of_node_put(arm_timer); Best practice would be to group of_node_put into a single place. bool available; [ ... ] available = of_device_is_available(arm_timer); of_node_put(arm_timer); if (available) { pr_warn_once("ARM architected timer wrap issue i940 detected\n"); return 0; } > if (pa == 0x4882c000) /* dra7 dmtimer15 */ > return dmtimer_percpu_timer_init(np, 0); > > --- > base-commit: d61a00525464bfc5fe92c6ad713350988e492b88 > change-id: 20241013-timer-ti-dm-systimer-of_node_put-d42735687698 > > Best regards, -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
On 28/10/2024 12:24, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > Hi Javier, > > thanks for spotting the issue > > > On 13/10/2024 12:14, Javier Carrasco wrote: >> of_find_compatible_node() increments the node's refcount, and it must be >> decremented again with a call to of_node_put() when the pointer is no >> longer required to avoid leaking memory. >> >> Add the missing calls to of_node_put() in dmtimer_percpu_quirck_init() >> for the 'arm_timer' device node. >> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Fixes: 25de4ce5ed02 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Handle dra7 >> timer wrap errata i940") >> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c b/drivers/ >> clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c >> index c2dcd8d68e45..23be1d21ce21 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c >> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c >> @@ -691,8 +691,10 @@ static int __init >> dmtimer_percpu_quirk_init(struct device_node *np, u32 pa) >> arm_timer = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,armv7-timer"); >> if (of_device_is_available(arm_timer)) { >> pr_warn_once("ARM architected timer wrap issue i940 >> detected\n"); >> + of_node_put(arm_timer); >> return 0; >> } >> + of_node_put(arm_timer); > > Best practice would be to group of_node_put into a single place. > > bool available; > > [ ... ] > > available = of_device_is_available(arm_timer); > of_node_put(arm_timer); > > if (available) { > pr_warn_once("ARM architected timer wrap issue i940 detected\n"); > return 0; > } > > >> if (pa == 0x4882c000) /* dra7 dmtimer15 */ >> return dmtimer_percpu_timer_init(np, 0); >> >> --- >> base-commit: d61a00525464bfc5fe92c6ad713350988e492b88 >> change-id: 20241013-timer-ti-dm-systimer-of_node_put-d42735687698 >> >> Best regards, > > Hi Daniel, thanks for your feedback. Actually, if we are going to refactor the code, we would not need the extra variable or even the call to of_node_put(), since we could use the __free() macro. That would be a second patch after the fix, which could stay as it is without refactoring, because it is only to backport the missing calls to of_node_put(). I can send a v2 with the extra patch leaving this one as it is, or if really desired, with the available variable. Best regards, Javier Carrasco
On 28/10/2024 13:26, Javier Carrasco wrote: [ ... ] > Hi Daniel, thanks for your feedback. > > Actually, if we are going to refactor the code, we would not need the > extra variable or even the call to of_node_put(), since we could use the > __free() macro. That would be a second patch after the fix, which could > stay as it is without refactoring, because it is only to backport the > missing calls to of_node_put(). > > I can send a v2 with the extra patch leaving this one as it is, or if > really desired, with the available variable. V2 with __free is fine -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.