From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>

Add "samsung-exynosautov920-wdt" compatible to the dt-schema
document. ExynosAutoV920 is new SoC for automotive, similar to
exynosautov9 but some CPU configurations are quite different.

Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.yaml | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.yaml
index 77a5ddd0426e..d175ae968336 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.yaml
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ properties:
           - samsung,exynos7-wdt                   # for Exynos7
           - samsung,exynos850-wdt                 # for Exynos850
           - samsung,exynosautov9-wdt              # for Exynosautov9
+          - samsung,exynosautov920-wdt            # for Exynosautov920
       - items:
           - enum:
               - tesla,fsd-wdt
@@ -77,6 +78,7 @@ allOf:
               - samsung,exynos7-wdt
               - samsung,exynos850-wdt
               - samsung,exynosautov9-wdt
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-wdt
     then:
       required:
         - samsung,syscon-phandle
@@ -88,6 +90,7 @@ allOf:
               - google,gs101-wdt
               - samsung,exynos850-wdt
               - samsung,exynosautov9-wdt
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-wdt
     then:
       properties:
         clocks:
-- 
2.46.0

On 10/10/2024 13:18, Taewan Kim wrote:
> From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
> 
> Add "samsung-exynosautov920-wdt" compatible to the dt-schema
> document. ExynosAutoV920 is new SoC for automotive, similar to
> exynosautov9 but some CPU configurations are quite different.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com>

Shall we do the work twice?

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 8:47 PM
> To: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com>; Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-
> watchdog.org>; Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>; Rob Herring
> <robh@kernel.org>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>; Conor Dooley
> <conor+dt@kernel.org>; Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: Document ExynosAutoV920
> watchdog bindings
> 
> On 10/10/2024 13:18, Taewan Kim wrote:
> > From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
> >
> > Add "samsung-exynosautov920-wdt" compatible to the dt-schema document.
> > ExynosAutoV920 is new SoC for automotive, similar to
> > exynosautov9 but some CPU configurations are quite different.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com>
> 
> Shall we do the work twice?

I missed it by mistake, I'm sorry.
I will push v3 with tags.
> 
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
> 
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions,
> under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when provided in
> a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here.
> However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The
> upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they
> apply.
> 
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=19c96b19-46525206-19c8e056-
> 000babdfecba-8f51e01dd01bb666&q=1&e=eb401f36-1904-4376-adea-
> 9688adb1d657&u=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.5-
> rc3%2Fsource%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting-patches.rst%23L577
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof