This patch is introduces a watchdog compatible string for rockchip's
RV1126. I have already send this patch[1] in the series[2] but somehow
missed watchdog maintainers and list. So resending this patch alone
again from the series[2].

Signed-off-by: Karthikeyan Krishnasamy <karthikeyan@linumiz.com>
---

- Link to patch: [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912142451.2952633-2-karthikeyan@linumiz.com 
- Link to series: [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912142451.2952633-1-karthikeyan@linumiz.com

Karthikeyan Krishnasamy (1):
  dt-bindings: watchdog: rockchip: Add rockchip,rv1126-wdt string

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

-- 
2.39.2

On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:44:07 +0530, Karthikeyan Krishnasamy wrote:
> This patch is introduces a watchdog compatible string for rockchip's
> RV1126. I have already send this patch[1] in the series[2] but somehow
> missed watchdog maintainers and list. So resending this patch alone
> again from the series[2].
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] dt-bindings: watchdog: rockchip: Add rockchip,rv1126-wdt string
      commit: 39579b8c8f9e6aba5b299d0309c4a411688b60b9

Best regards,
-- 
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

On 10/9/24 23:14, Karthikeyan Krishnasamy wrote:
> This patch is introduces a watchdog compatible string for rockchip's
> RV1126. I have already send this patch[1] in the series[2] but somehow
> missed watchdog maintainers and list. So resending this patch alone
> again from the series[2].
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karthikeyan Krishnasamy <karthikeyan@linumiz.com>
> ---
> 
> - Link to patch: [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912142451.2952633-2-karthikeyan@linumiz.com
> - Link to series: [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912142451.2952633-1-karthikeyan@linumiz.com
> 
> Karthikeyan Krishnasamy (1):
>    dt-bindings: watchdog: rockchip: Add rockchip,rv1126-wdt string
> 
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 

I am curious: More and more people send introduction patches for individual
patches. I don't see any value in it, the intro patch is not available
in patchwork, and thus the context is missing when trying to review the
patch from there. This makes reviews much more difficult if one doesn't
reply directly to the patch. It doesn't make any sense to me, yet people
do it more and more.

Where is it suggested to send introduction patches for single-patch series,
and what is the rationale ?

Thanks,
Guenter

On 10/10/24 19:44, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/9/24 23:14, Karthikeyan Krishnasamy wrote:
>> This patch is introduces a watchdog compatible string for rockchip's
>> RV1126. I have already send this patch[1] in the series[2] but somehow
>> missed watchdog maintainers and list. So resending this patch alone
>> again from the series[2].
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Karthikeyan Krishnasamy <karthikeyan@linumiz.com>
>> ---
>>
>> - Link to patch: [1]. 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912142451.2952633-2-karthikeyan@linumiz.com
>> - Link to series: [2]. 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912142451.2952633-1-karthikeyan@linumiz.com
>>
>> Karthikeyan Krishnasamy (1):
>>    dt-bindings: watchdog: rockchip: Add rockchip,rv1126-wdt string
>>
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
> 
> I am curious: More and more people send introduction patches for individual
> patches. I don't see any value in it, the intro patch is not available
> in patchwork, and thus the context is missing when trying to review the
> patch from there. This makes reviews much more difficult if one doesn't
> reply directly to the patch. It doesn't make any sense to me, yet people
> do it more and more.
> 
> Where is it suggested to send introduction patches for single-patch series,
> and what is the rationale ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Guenter
> 

Hi,

I had missed watchdog maintainers in previous patch series, and received 
a tag for this patch from the one of the maintainer. So i thought, 
mention this make sense and added this info in introduction patch. That 
is the reason. Looks like i made a mistake.

Best Regards,
Karthikeyan