Create a test for the robust list mechanism. Test the following uAPI
operations:

- Creating a robust mutex where the lock waiter is wake by the kernel
  when the lock owner died
- Setting a robust list to the current task
- Getting a robust list from the current task
- Getting a robust list from another task
- Using the list_op_pending field from robust_list_head struct to test
  robustness when the lock owner dies before completing the locking
- Setting a invalid size for syscall argument `len`

Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
---
Changes from v2:
- Dropped kselftest_harness include, using just futex test API
- This is the expected output:

 TAP version 13
 1..6
 ok 1 test_robustness
 ok 2 test_set_robust_list_invalid_size
 ok 3 test_get_robust_list_self
 ok 4 test_get_robust_list_child
 ok 5 test_set_list_op_pending
 ok 6 test_robust_list_multiple_elements
 # Totals: pass:6 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0

Changes from v1:
- Change futex type from int to _Atomic(unsigned int)
- Use old futex(FUTEX_WAIT) instead of the new sys_futex_wait()
---
 .../selftests/futex/functional/.gitignore     |   1 +
 .../selftests/futex/functional/Makefile       |   3 +-
 .../selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c  | 512 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 515 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/.gitignore
index fbcbdb6963b3..4726e1be7497 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/.gitignore
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ futex_wait_wouldblock
 futex_wait
 futex_requeue
 futex_waitv
+robust_list
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile
index f79f9bac7918..b8635a1ac7f6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS := \
 	futex_wait_private_mapped_file \
 	futex_wait \
 	futex_requeue \
-	futex_waitv
+	futex_waitv \
+	robust_list
 
 TEST_PROGS := run.sh
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7bfda2d39821
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c
@@ -0,0 +1,512 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Igalia S.L.
+ *
+ * Robust list test by André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
+ *
+ * The robust list uAPI allows userspace to create "robust" locks, in the sense
+ * that if the lock holder thread dies, the remaining threads that are waiting
+ * for the lock won't block forever, waiting for a lock that will never be
+ * released.
+ *
+ * This is achieve by userspace setting a list where a thread can enter all the
+ * locks (futexes) that it is holding. The robust list is a linked list, and
+ * userspace register the start of the list with the syscall set_robust_list().
+ * If such thread eventually dies, the kernel will walk this list, waking up one
+ * thread waiting for each futex and marking the futex word with the flag
+ * FUTEX_OWNER_DIED.
+ *
+ * See also
+ *	man set_robust_list
+ *	Documententation/locking/robust-futex-ABI.rst
+ *	Documententation/locking/robust-futexes.rst
+ */
+
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+
+#include "futextest.h"
+#include "logging.h"
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <stdatomic.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <stddef.h>
+#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <sys/wait.h>
+
+#define STACK_SIZE (1024 * 1024)
+
+#define FUTEX_TIMEOUT 3
+
+static pthread_barrier_t barrier, barrier2;
+
+int set_robust_list(struct robust_list_head *head, size_t len)
+{
+	return syscall(SYS_set_robust_list, head, len);
+}
+
+int get_robust_list(int pid, struct robust_list_head **head, size_t *len_ptr)
+{
+	return syscall(SYS_get_robust_list, pid, head, len_ptr);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Basic lock struct, contains just the futex word and the robust list element
+ * Real implementations have also a *prev to easily walk in the list
+ */
+struct lock_struct {
+	_Atomic(unsigned int) futex;
+	struct robust_list list;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Helper function to spawn a child thread. Returns -1 on error, pid on success
+ */
+static int create_child(int (*fn)(void *arg), void *arg)
+{
+	char *stack;
+	pid_t pid;
+
+	stack = mmap(NULL, STACK_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
+		     MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_STACK, -1, 0);
+	if (stack == MAP_FAILED)
+		return -1;
+
+	stack += STACK_SIZE;
+
+	pid = clone(fn, stack, CLONE_VM | SIGCHLD, arg);
+
+	if (pid == -1)
+		return -1;
+
+	return pid;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Helper function to prepare and register a robust list
+ */
+static int set_list(struct robust_list_head *head)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = set_robust_list(head, sizeof(struct robust_list_head));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	head->futex_offset = (size_t) offsetof(struct lock_struct, futex) -
+			     (size_t) offsetof(struct lock_struct, list);
+	head->list.next = &head->list;
+	head->list_op_pending = NULL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * A basic (and incomplete) mutex lock function with robustness
+ */
+static int mutex_lock(struct lock_struct *lock, struct robust_list_head *head, bool error_inject)
+{
+	_Atomic(unsigned int) *futex = &lock->futex;
+	int zero = 0, ret = -1;
+	pid_t tid = gettid();
+
+	/*
+	 * Set list_op_pending before starting the lock, so the kernel can catch
+	 * the case where the thread died during the lock operation
+	 */
+	head->list_op_pending = &lock->list;
+
+	if (atomic_compare_exchange_strong(futex, &zero, tid)) {
+		/*
+		 * We took the lock, insert it in the robust list
+		 */
+		struct robust_list *list = &head->list;
+
+		/* Error injection to test list_op_pending */
+		if (error_inject)
+			return 0;
+
+		while (list->next != &head->list)
+			list = list->next;
+
+		list->next = &lock->list;
+		lock->list.next = &head->list;
+
+		ret = 0;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * We didn't take the lock, wait until the owner wakes (or dies)
+		 */
+		struct timespec to;
+
+		clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &to);
+		to.tv_sec = to.tv_sec + FUTEX_TIMEOUT;
+
+		tid = atomic_load(futex);
+		/* Kernel ignores futexes without the waiters flag */
+		tid |= FUTEX_WAITERS;
+		atomic_store(futex, tid);
+
+		ret = futex_wait((futex_t *) futex, tid, &to, 0);
+
+		/*
+		 * A real mutex_lock() implementation would loop here to finally
+		 * take the lock. We don't care about that, so we stop here.
+		 */
+	}
+
+	head->list_op_pending = NULL;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This child thread will succeed taking the lock, and then will exit holding it
+ */
+static int child_fn_lock(void *arg)
+{
+	struct lock_struct *lock = (struct lock_struct *) arg;
+	struct robust_list_head head;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = set_list(&head);
+	if (ret)
+		ksft_test_result_fail("set_robust_list error\n");
+
+	ret = mutex_lock(lock, &head, false);
+	if (ret)
+		ksft_test_result_fail("mutex_lock error\n");
+
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
+
+	/*
+	 * There's a race here: the parent thread needs to be inside
+	 * futex_wait() before the child thread dies, otherwise it will miss the
+	 * wakeup from handle_futex_death() that this child will emit. We wait a
+	 * little bit just to make sure that this happens.
+	 */
+	sleep(1);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Spawns a child thread that will set a robust list, take the lock, register it
+ * in the robust list and die. The parent thread will wait on this futex, and
+ * should be waken up when the child exits.
+ */
+static void test_robustness()
+{
+	struct lock_struct lock = { .futex = 0 };
+	struct robust_list_head head;
+	_Atomic(unsigned int) *futex = &lock.futex;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = set_list(&head);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * Lets use a barrier to ensure that the child thread takes the lock
+	 * before the parent
+	 */
+	ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+	ret = create_child(&child_fn_lock, &lock);
+	ASSERT_NE(ret, -1);
+
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
+	ret = mutex_lock(&lock, &head, false);
+
+	/*
+	 * futex_wait() should return 0 and the futex word should be marked with
+	 * FUTEX_OWNER_DIED
+	 */
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+	if (ret != 0)
+		printf("futex wait returned %d", errno);
+
+	ASSERT_TRUE(*futex | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED);
+
+	pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier);
+
+	ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", __func__);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The only valid value for len is sizeof(*head)
+ */
+static void test_set_robust_list_invalid_size()
+{
+	struct robust_list_head head;
+	size_t head_size = sizeof(struct robust_list_head);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = set_robust_list(&head, head_size);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+	ret = set_robust_list(&head, head_size * 2);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, -1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL);
+
+	ret = set_robust_list(&head, head_size - 1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, -1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL);
+
+	ret = set_robust_list(&head, 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, -1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL);
+
+	ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", __func__);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test get_robust_list with pid = 0, getting the list of the running thread
+ */
+static void test_get_robust_list_self()
+{
+	struct robust_list_head head, head2, *get_head;
+	size_t head_size = sizeof(struct robust_list_head), len_ptr;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = set_robust_list(&head, head_size);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+	ret = get_robust_list(0, &get_head, &len_ptr);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(get_head, &head);
+	ASSERT_EQ(head_size, len_ptr);
+
+	ret = set_robust_list(&head2, head_size);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+	ret = get_robust_list(0, &get_head, &len_ptr);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(get_head, &head2);
+	ASSERT_EQ(head_size, len_ptr);
+
+	ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", __func__);
+}
+
+static int child_list(void *arg)
+{
+	struct robust_list_head *head = (struct robust_list_head *) arg;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = set_robust_list(head, sizeof(struct robust_list_head));
+	if (ret)
+		ksft_test_result_fail("set_robust_list error\n");
+
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier2);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test get_robust_list from another thread. We use two barriers here to ensure
+ * that:
+ *   1) the child thread set the list before we try to get it from the
+ * parent
+ *   2) the child thread still alive when we try to get the list from it
+ */
+static void test_get_robust_list_child()
+{
+	pid_t tid;
+	int ret;
+	struct robust_list_head head, *get_head;
+	size_t len_ptr;
+
+	ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2);
+	ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier2, NULL, 2);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+	tid = create_child(&child_list, &head);
+	ASSERT_NE(tid, -1);
+
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
+
+	ret = get_robust_list(tid, &get_head, &len_ptr);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(&head, get_head);
+
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier2);
+
+	pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier);
+	pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier2);
+
+	ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", __func__);
+}
+
+static int child_fn_lock_with_error(void *arg)
+{
+	struct lock_struct *lock = (struct lock_struct *) arg;
+	struct robust_list_head head;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = set_list(&head);
+	if (ret)
+		ksft_test_result_fail("set_robust_list error\n");
+
+	ret = mutex_lock(lock, &head, true);
+	if (ret)
+		ksft_test_result_fail("mutex_lock error\n");
+
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
+
+	sleep(1);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Same as robustness test, but inject an error where the mutex_lock() exits
+ * earlier, just after setting list_op_pending and taking the lock, to test the
+ * list_op_pending mechanism
+ */
+static void test_set_list_op_pending()
+{
+	struct lock_struct lock = { .futex = 0 };
+	struct robust_list_head head;
+	_Atomic(unsigned int) *futex = &lock.futex;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = set_list(&head);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+	ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+	ret = create_child(&child_fn_lock_with_error, &lock);
+	ASSERT_NE(ret, -1);
+
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
+	ret = mutex_lock(&lock, &head, false);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+	if (ret != 0)
+		printf("futex wait returned %d", errno);
+
+	ASSERT_TRUE(*futex | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED);
+
+	pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier);
+
+	ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", __func__);
+}
+
+#define CHILD_NR 10
+
+static int child_lock_holder(void *arg)
+{
+	struct lock_struct *locks = (struct lock_struct *) arg;
+	struct robust_list_head head;
+	int i;
+
+	set_list(&head);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < CHILD_NR; i++) {
+		locks[i].futex = 0;
+		mutex_lock(&locks[i], &head, false);
+	}
+
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier2);
+
+	sleep(1);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int child_wait_lock(void *arg)
+{
+	struct lock_struct *lock = (struct lock_struct *) arg;
+	struct robust_list_head head;
+	int ret;
+
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier2);
+	ret = mutex_lock(lock, &head, false);
+
+	if (ret)
+		ksft_test_result_fail("mutex_lock error\n");
+
+	if (!(lock->futex | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED))
+		ksft_test_result_fail("futex not marked with FUTEX_OWNER_DIED\n");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test a robust list of more than one element. All the waiters should wake when
+ * the holder dies
+ */
+static void test_robust_list_multiple_elements()
+{
+	struct lock_struct locks[CHILD_NR];
+	int i, ret;
+
+	ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+	ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier2, NULL, CHILD_NR + 1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+
+	create_child(&child_lock_holder, &locks);
+
+	/* Wait until the locker thread takes the look */
+	pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < CHILD_NR; i++)
+		create_child(&child_wait_lock, &locks[i]);
+
+	/* Wait for all children to return */
+	while (wait(NULL) > 0);
+
+	pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier);
+	pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier2);
+
+	ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", __func__);
+}
+
+void usage(char *prog)
+{
+	printf("Usage: %s\n", prog);
+	printf("  -c	Use color\n");
+	printf("  -h	Display this help message\n");
+	printf("  -v L	Verbosity level: %d=QUIET %d=CRITICAL %d=INFO\n",
+	       VQUIET, VCRITICAL, VINFO);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+	int c;
+
+	while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "cht:v:")) != -1) {
+		switch (c) {
+		case 'c':
+			log_color(1);
+			break;
+		case 'h':
+			usage(basename(argv[0]));
+			exit(0);
+		case 'v':
+			log_verbosity(atoi(optarg));
+			break;
+		default:
+			usage(basename(argv[0]));
+			exit(1);
+		}
+	}
+
+	ksft_print_header();
+	ksft_set_plan(6);
+
+	test_robustness();
+	test_set_robust_list_invalid_size();
+	test_get_robust_list_self();
+	test_get_robust_list_child();
+	test_set_list_op_pending();
+	test_robust_list_multiple_elements();
+
+	ksft_print_cnts();
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.46.0

Hi André,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on tip/locking/core]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.12-rc2 next-20241011]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andr-Almeida/selftests-futex-Add-ASSERT_-macros/20241010-091311
base:   tip/locking/core
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241010011142.905297-3-andrealmeid%40igalia.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests/futex: Create test for robust list
:::::: branch date: 2 days ago
:::::: commit date: 2 days ago
compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241012/202410120549.1KpTVqTu-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202410120549.1KpTVqTu-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> robust_list.c:121:44: warning: passing 'int *' to parameter of type 'unsigned int *' converts between pointers to integer types with different sign [-Wpointer-sign]
     121 |         if (atomic_compare_exchange_strong(futex, &zero, tid)) {
         |                                                   ^~~~~
   /opt/cross/clang-3b5b5c1ec4/lib/clang/18/include/stdatomic.h:144:112: note: expanded from macro 'atomic_compare_exchange_strong'
     144 | #define atomic_compare_exchange_strong(object, expected, desired) __c11_atomic_compare_exchange_strong(object, expected, desired, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)
         |                                                                                                                ^~~~~~~~
   1 warning generated.

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki