We should also verify that poisoned data after a misaligned struct is
also handled correctly by is_zeroed_user(). This test passes with no
kernel changes needed, so is_zeroed_user() was correct already.

Fixes: b28a10aedcd4 ("selftests: add openat2(2) selftests")
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
index 5790ab446527..4ca175a16ad6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c
@@ -112,9 +112,9 @@ void test_openat2_struct(void)
 				 *
 				 * This is effectively to check that is_zeroed_user() works.
 				 */
-				copy = malloc(misalign + sizeof(how_ext));
+				copy = malloc(misalign*2 + sizeof(how_ext));
 				how_copy = copy + misalign;
-				memset(copy, 0xff, misalign);
+				memset(copy, 0xff, misalign*2 + sizeof(how_ext));
 				memcpy(how_copy, &how_ext, sizeof(how_ext));
 			}
 

-- 
2.46.1