The function strcpy() is depreciated and potentially unsafe. It performs
no bounds checking on the destination buffer. This could result in
linear overflows beyond the end of the buffer, leading to all kinds of
misbehaviors. The safe replacement is strscpy() [1].

this fixes checkpatch warning:
    WARNING: Prefer strscpy over strcpy

Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strcpy [1]
Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
index 9d7e6b712abf..d460dd194f19 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
@@ -1832,8 +1832,8 @@ static int asus_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
 	if (!asus)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	asus->handle = device->handle;
-	strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_DEVICE_NAME);
-	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_CLASS);
+	strscpy(acpi_device_name(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_DEVICE_NAME);
+	strscpy(acpi_device_class(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_CLASS);
 	device->driver_data = asus;
 	asus->device = device;
 
-- 
2.43.0

On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 04:35:58 +0530, Abdul Rahim wrote:

> The function strcpy() is depreciated and potentially unsafe. It performs
> no bounds checking on the destination buffer. This could result in
> linear overflows beyond the end of the buffer, leading to all kinds of
> misbehaviors. The safe replacement is strscpy() [1].
> 
> this fixes checkpatch warning:
>     WARNING: Prefer strscpy over strcpy
> 
> [...]


Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
review-ilpo branch. Note it will show up in the public
platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo branch only once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

The list of commits applied:
[1/1] asus-laptop: prefer strscpy() over strcpy()
      commit: 8150408bfdb2f9c17970295427cf91470189e6d0

--
 i.

Hi,

On 10-Oct-24 1:05 AM, Abdul Rahim wrote:
> The function strcpy() is depreciated and potentially unsafe. It performs
> no bounds checking on the destination buffer. This could result in
> linear overflows beyond the end of the buffer, leading to all kinds of
> misbehaviors. The safe replacement is strscpy() [1].
> 
> this fixes checkpatch warning:
>     WARNING: Prefer strscpy over strcpy
> 
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strcpy [1]
> Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com>

Thanks, patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Regards,

Hans



> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> index 9d7e6b712abf..d460dd194f19 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> @@ -1832,8 +1832,8 @@ static int asus_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>  	if (!asus)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	asus->handle = device->handle;
> -	strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_DEVICE_NAME);
> -	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_CLASS);
> +	strscpy(acpi_device_name(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_DEVICE_NAME);
> +	strscpy(acpi_device_class(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_CLASS);
>  	device->driver_data = asus;
>  	asus->device = device;
>

On Thu, 10 Oct 2024, at 12:05 PM, Abdul Rahim wrote:
> The function strcpy() is depreciated and potentially unsafe. It performs
> no bounds checking on the destination buffer. This could result in
> linear overflows beyond the end of the buffer, leading to all kinds of
> misbehaviors. The safe replacement is strscpy() [1].
>
> this fixes checkpatch warning:
>     WARNING: Prefer strscpy over strcpy
>
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strcpy [1]
> Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c 
> b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> index 9d7e6b712abf..d460dd194f19 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
> @@ -1832,8 +1832,8 @@ static int asus_acpi_add(struct acpi_device 
> *device)
>  	if (!asus)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	asus->handle = device->handle;
> -	strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_DEVICE_NAME);
> -	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_CLASS);
> +	strscpy(acpi_device_name(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_DEVICE_NAME);
> +	strscpy(acpi_device_class(device), ASUS_LAPTOP_CLASS);
>  	device->driver_data = asus;
>  	asus->device = device;
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0

Looks good, thank you for doing this.

Reviewed-by: Luke D. Jones <luke@ljones.dev>