On Wed 09-10-24 23:17:27, Tang Yizhou wrote:
> From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
>
> The name of the BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL macro is misleading, as it is not
> only used in the bandwidth update functions wb_update_bandwidth() and
> __wb_update_bandwidth(), but also in the dirty limit update function
> domain_update_dirty_limit().
>
> Currently, we haven't found an ideal name, so update the comment only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index fcd4c1439cb9..c7c6b58a8461 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
> #define DIRTY_POLL_THRESH (128 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10))
>
> /*
> - * Estimate write bandwidth at 200ms intervals.
> + * Estimate write bandwidth or update dirty limit at 200ms intervals.
> */
> #define BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL max(HZ/5, 1)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR