From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
hard_pps() update does not modify anything which might be required by time
readers so forcing readers out of the way during the update is a pointless
exercise.
The interaction with adjtimex() and timekeeper updates which call into the
NTP code is properly serialized by timekeeper_lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 6acff4cb7b1c..4e3afe22d28c 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -2627,11 +2627,7 @@ void hardpps(const struct timespec64 *phase_ts, const struct timespec64 *raw_ts)
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
- write_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq);
-
__hardpps(phase_ts, raw_ts);
-
- write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(hardpps);
--
2.39.5