drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
The device_for_each_child_node() macro requires explicit calls to
fwnode_handle_put() upon early exits (return, break, goto) to decrement
the fwnode's refcount, and avoid levaing a node reference behind.
Add the missing fwnode_handle_put() after the common label for all error
paths.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: fdc6b21e2444 ("platform/chrome: Add Type C connector class driver")
Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
---
I usually switch to the scoped variant of the macro to fix such issues,
but given that the fix is relevant for stable kernels, I have provided
the "classical" approach by adding the missing fwnode_handle_put().
If switching to the scoped variant is desired, please let me know.
This driver and cross_typec_switch could be easily converted.
By the way, I wonder why all error paths are redirected to the same
label to unregister ports, even before registering them (which seems to
be harmless because unregistered ports are ignored, but still). With this
fix, that jump to the label is definitely required, but if the scoped
variant is used, maybe some simple returns would be enough.
---
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
index c7781aea0b88..f1324466efac 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
@@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ static int cros_typec_init_ports(struct cros_typec_data *typec)
return 0;
unregister_ports:
+ fwnode_handle_put(fwnode);
cros_unregister_ports(typec);
return ret;
}
---
base-commit: b6270c3bca987530eafc6a15f9d54ecd0033e0e3
change-id: 20241009-cross_ec_typec_fwnode_handle_put-9f13b4bd467f
Best regards,
--
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
On 09/10/2024 20:55, Javier Carrasco wrote: > The device_for_each_child_node() macro requires explicit calls to > fwnode_handle_put() upon early exits (return, break, goto) to decrement > the fwnode's refcount, and avoid levaing a node reference behind. > > Add the missing fwnode_handle_put() after the common label for all error > paths. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Fixes: fdc6b21e2444 ("platform/chrome: Add Type C connector class driver") > Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com> > --- > I usually switch to the scoped variant of the macro to fix such issues, > but given that the fix is relevant for stable kernels, I have provided > the "classical" approach by adding the missing fwnode_handle_put(). > > If switching to the scoped variant is desired, please let me know. > This driver and cross_typec_switch could be easily converted. > > By the way, I wonder why all error paths are redirected to the same > label to unregister ports, even before registering them (which seems to > be harmless because unregistered ports are ignored, but still). With this > fix, that jump to the label is definitely required, but if the scoped > variant is used, maybe some simple returns would be enough. > --- > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c > index c7781aea0b88..f1324466efac 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c > @@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ static int cros_typec_init_ports(struct cros_typec_data *typec) > return 0; > > unregister_ports: > + fwnode_handle_put(fwnode); > cros_unregister_ports(typec); > return ret; > } > > --- > base-commit: b6270c3bca987530eafc6a15f9d54ecd0033e0e3 > change-id: 20241009-cross_ec_typec_fwnode_handle_put-9f13b4bd467f > > Best regards, Small typo in the description, should be cross_ec_typec (last c is missing). I will fix that for v2, but I will wait for feedback and reviews to this first version. Best regards, Javier Carrasco
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 09:00:41PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote: > On 09/10/2024 20:55, Javier Carrasco wrote: > > By the way, I wonder why all error paths are redirected to the same > > label to unregister ports, even before registering them (which seems to > > be harmless because unregistered ports are ignored, but still). With this I don't know the context a lot. But it looks like just a way to unregister the registered ones in the error path. > Small typo in the description, should be cross_ec_typec (last c is > missing). I will fix that for v2, but I will wait for feedback and > reviews to this first version. Also cross -> cros. Otherwise, the fix looks good to me.
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.