It's done in probe so it should be done here.

Fixes: 1d3bb996 ("Device tree aware EMAC driver")
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
 v2: Rebase and add proper fixes line.
 drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
index a93423035325..c634534710d9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
@@ -742,6 +742,8 @@ static void mal_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
 
 	free_netdev(mal->dummy_dev);
 
+	dcr_unmap(mal->dcr_host, 0x100);
+
 	dma_free_coherent(&ofdev->dev,
 			  sizeof(struct mal_descriptor) *
 			  (NUM_TX_BUFF * mal->num_tx_chans +
-- 
2.46.2

Hello Rosen,

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 04:30:50PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> It's done in probe so it should be done here.
> 
> Fixes: 1d3bb996 ("Device tree aware EMAC driver")
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---
>  v2: Rebase and add proper fixes line.
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
> index a93423035325..c634534710d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
> @@ -742,6 +742,8 @@ static void mal_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>  
>  	free_netdev(mal->dummy_dev);
>  
> +	dcr_unmap(mal->dcr_host, 0x100);
> +
>  	dma_free_coherent(&ofdev->dev,
>  			  sizeof(struct mal_descriptor) *
>  			  (NUM_TX_BUFF * mal->num_tx_chans +

The fix per see seems correct, but, there are a few things you might
want to improve:

1) Fixes: format
Your "Fixes:" line does not follow the expected format, as detected by
checkpatch. you might want something as:

	Fixes: 1d3bb996481e ("Device tree aware EMAC driver")


2) The description can be improved. For instance, you say it is done in
probe but not in remove. Why should it be done in remove instead of
removed from probe()? That would help me to review it better, instead of
going into the code and figure it out.

Once you have fixed it, feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>

On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:23:02 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hello Rosen,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 04:30:50PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > It's done in probe so it should be done here.
> > 
> > Fixes: 1d3bb996 ("Device tree aware EMAC driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  v2: Rebase and add proper fixes line.
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
> > index a93423035325..c634534710d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
> > @@ -742,6 +742,8 @@ static void mal_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> >  
> >  	free_netdev(mal->dummy_dev);
> >  
> > +	dcr_unmap(mal->dcr_host, 0x100);
> > +
> >  	dma_free_coherent(&ofdev->dev,
> >  			  sizeof(struct mal_descriptor) *
> >  			  (NUM_TX_BUFF * mal->num_tx_chans +  
> 
> The fix per see seems correct, but, there are a few things you might
> want to improve:
> 
> 1) Fixes: format
> Your "Fixes:" line does not follow the expected format, as detected by
> checkpatch. you might want something as:
> 
> 	Fixes: 1d3bb996481e ("Device tree aware EMAC driver")
> 
> 
> 2) The description can be improved. For instance, you say it is done in
> probe but not in remove. Why should it be done in remove instead of
> removed from probe()? That would help me to review it better, instead of
> going into the code and figure it out.
> 
> Once you have fixed it, feel free to add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>

Good points, I'll fix when applying - I want to make sure this gets
into tomorrow's PR 'cause Rosen has patches for net-next depending 
on it.

On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 7:28 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:23:02 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Hello Rosen,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 04:30:50PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > > It's done in probe so it should be done here.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 1d3bb996 ("Device tree aware EMAC driver")
> > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  v2: Rebase and add proper fixes line.
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
> > > index a93423035325..c634534710d9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/emac/mal.c
> > > @@ -742,6 +742,8 @@ static void mal_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> > >
> > >     free_netdev(mal->dummy_dev);
> > >
> > > +   dcr_unmap(mal->dcr_host, 0x100);
> > > +
> > >     dma_free_coherent(&ofdev->dev,
> > >                       sizeof(struct mal_descriptor) *
> > >                       (NUM_TX_BUFF * mal->num_tx_chans +
> >
> > The fix per see seems correct, but, there are a few things you might
> > want to improve:
> >
> > 1) Fixes: format
> > Your "Fixes:" line does not follow the expected format, as detected by
> > checkpatch. you might want something as:
> >
> >       Fixes: 1d3bb996481e ("Device tree aware EMAC driver")
> >
> >
> > 2) The description can be improved. For instance, you say it is done in
> > probe but not in remove. Why should it be done in remove instead of
> > removed from probe()? That would help me to review it better, instead of
> > going into the code and figure it out.
> >
> > Once you have fixed it, feel free to add:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
>
> Good points, I'll fix when applying - I want to make sure this gets
> into tomorrow's PR 'cause Rosen has patches for net-next depending
> on it.
Much appreciated.