Hi Jonathan,
On 10/17/2024 8:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 12:31:35 -0500
> Terry Bowman <Terry.Bowman@amd.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/16/24 11:30, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:16:48 -0500
>>> Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The CXL AER service will be updated to support CXL PCIe port error
>>>> handling in the future. These devices will use a system panic during
>>>> recovery handling.
>>>
>>> Recovery handling by panic? :) That's an interesting form of recovery..
>>>
>>
>> Yes, Dan requested all UCE (fatal and non-fatal) are handled by panic in order
>> to limit the blast radius of corruption in the case of UCE.
> That's fair enough. Maybe it should be called attempted recovery handling ;)
>
> This is fine.
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>
> Jonathan
>
I'll add "attempted" recovery to the commit message.
Regards,
Terry
>>
>> The recovery logic in cxl_do_recovery() (not using the panic) is also tested as well.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Terry
>>
>>>>
>>>> Add PCI_ERS_RESULT_PANIC enumeration to pci_ers_result type.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/linux/pci.h | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>>>> index 4cf89a4b4cbc..6f7e7371161d 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>>>> @@ -857,6 +857,9 @@ enum pci_ers_result {
>>>>
>>>> /* No AER capabilities registered for the driver */
>>>> PCI_ERS_RESULT_NO_AER_DRIVER = (__force pci_ers_result_t) 6,
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Device state requires system panic */
>>>> + PCI_ERS_RESULT_PANIC = (__force pci_ers_result_t) 7,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> /* PCI bus error event callbacks */
>>>
>