drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Performance problems may occur if there is a problem with the
asymmetric connected lane such as h/w failure.
Currently, only check connected lane for rx/tx is checked if it is not 0.
But it should also be checked if it is asymmetrically connected.
v1 -> v2: add error routine.
ufs initialization error occurs in case of asymmetic connected
Signed-off-by: SEO HOYOUNG <hy50.seo@samsung.com>
---
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 24a32e2fd75e..1381eb7d506a 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -4540,6 +4540,14 @@ static int ufshcd_get_max_pwr_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (pwr_info->lane_rx != pwr_info->lane_tx) {
+ dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: asymmetric connected lanes. rx=%d, tx=%d\n",
+ __func__,
+ pwr_info->lane_rx,
+ pwr_info->lane_tx);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
/*
* First, get the maximum gears of HS speed.
* If a zero value, it means there is no HSGEAR capability.
@@ -8579,7 +8587,8 @@ static int ufshcd_device_params_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
hba->dev_info.f_power_on_wp_en = flag;
/* Probe maximum power mode co-supported by both UFS host and device */
- if (ufshcd_get_max_pwr_mode(hba))
+ ret = ufshcd_get_max_pwr_mode(hba);
+ if (ret)
dev_err(hba->dev,
"%s: Failed getting max supported power mode\n",
__func__);
--
2.26.0
On 10/7/24 11:38 PM, SEO HOYOUNG wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 24a32e2fd75e..1381eb7d506a 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -4540,6 +4540,14 @@ static int ufshcd_get_max_pwr_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (pwr_info->lane_rx != pwr_info->lane_tx) {
> + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: asymmetric connected lanes. rx=%d, tx=%d\n",
> + __func__,
> + pwr_info->lane_rx,
> + pwr_info->lane_tx);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * First, get the maximum gears of HS speed.
> * If a zero value, it means there is no HSGEAR capability.
> @@ -8579,7 +8587,8 @@ static int ufshcd_device_params_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> hba->dev_info.f_power_on_wp_en = flag;
>
> /* Probe maximum power mode co-supported by both UFS host and device */
> - if (ufshcd_get_max_pwr_mode(hba))
> + ret = ufshcd_get_max_pwr_mode(hba);
> + if (ret)
> dev_err(hba->dev,
> "%s: Failed getting max supported power mode\n",
> __func__);
I see two independent changes in the above patch. Should this patch
perhaps be split into two patches?
Thanks,
Bart.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.