[PATCH RFC v5 05/10] tun: Pad virtio header with zero

Akihiko Odaki posted 10 patches 1 month, 2 weeks ago
[PATCH RFC v5 05/10] tun: Pad virtio header with zero
Posted by Akihiko Odaki 1 month, 2 weeks ago
tun used to simply advance iov_iter when it needs to pad virtio header,
which leaves the garbage in the buffer as is. This is especially
problematic when tun starts to allow enabling the hash reporting
feature; even if the feature is enabled, the packet may lack a hash
value and may contain a hole in the virtio header because the packet
arrived before the feature gets enabled or does not contain the
header fields to be hashed. If the hole is not filled with zero, it is
impossible to tell if the packet lacks a hash value.

In theory, a user of tun can fill the buffer with zero before calling
read() to avoid such a problem, but leaving the garbage in the buffer is
awkward anyway so fill the buffer in tun.

Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
---
 drivers/net/tun_vnet.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/tun_vnet.h b/drivers/net/tun_vnet.h
index 7c7f3f6d85e9..c40bde0fdf8c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun_vnet.h
+++ b/drivers/net/tun_vnet.h
@@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ static inline int tun_vnet_hdr_put(int sz, struct iov_iter *iter,
 	if (copy_to_iter(hdr, sizeof(*hdr), iter) != sizeof(*hdr))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
-	iov_iter_advance(iter, sz - sizeof(*hdr));
+	if (iov_iter_zero(sz - sizeof(*hdr), iter) != sz - sizeof(*hdr))
+		return -EFAULT;
 
 	return 0;
 }

-- 
2.46.2
Re: [PATCH RFC v5 05/10] tun: Pad virtio header with zero
Posted by Jason Wang 1 month, 2 weeks ago
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:55 PM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> wrote:
>
> tun used to simply advance iov_iter when it needs to pad virtio header,
> which leaves the garbage in the buffer as is. This is especially
> problematic when tun starts to allow enabling the hash reporting
> feature; even if the feature is enabled, the packet may lack a hash
> value and may contain a hole in the virtio header because the packet
> arrived before the feature gets enabled or does not contain the
> header fields to be hashed. If the hole is not filled with zero, it is
> impossible to tell if the packet lacks a hash value.
>
> In theory, a user of tun can fill the buffer with zero before calling
> read() to avoid such a problem, but leaving the garbage in the buffer is
> awkward anyway so fill the buffer in tun.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>

This sounds like an independent fix that is worth going to -net first.

Thanks

> ---
>  drivers/net/tun_vnet.h | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun_vnet.h b/drivers/net/tun_vnet.h
> index 7c7f3f6d85e9..c40bde0fdf8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun_vnet.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun_vnet.h
> @@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ static inline int tun_vnet_hdr_put(int sz, struct iov_iter *iter,
>         if (copy_to_iter(hdr, sizeof(*hdr), iter) != sizeof(*hdr))
>                 return -EFAULT;
>
> -       iov_iter_advance(iter, sz - sizeof(*hdr));
> +       if (iov_iter_zero(sz - sizeof(*hdr), iter) != sz - sizeof(*hdr))
> +               return -EFAULT;
>
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.46.2
>