On DT platforms, if a regulator init_data is provided in config, it is
silently ignored in favor of the DT parsing done by the framework, if
of_match is set.
of_match is an indication that init_data is expected to be set based on DT
and the parsing should be done by the regulator framework.
If the regulator provider passed init_data it must be because it is useful
somehow, in such case of_match should be clear.
If the driver expects the framework to initialize this data on its
own, it should leave init_data clear.
Warn if both init_data and of_match are set, then default to the provided
init_data.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index d0b3879f2746..a58a9db3d9c7 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -5681,32 +5681,43 @@ regulator_register(struct device *dev,
goto clean;
}
- init_data = regulator_of_get_init_data(dev, regulator_desc, config,
- &rdev->dev.of_node);
-
- /*
- * Sometimes not all resources are probed already so we need to take
- * that into account. This happens most the time if the ena_gpiod comes
- * from a gpio extender or something else.
- */
- if (PTR_ERR(init_data) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
- ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
- goto clean;
- }
+ if (config->init_data) {
+ /*
+ * Providing of_match means the framework is expected to parse
+ * DT to get the init_data. This would conflict with provided
+ * init_data, if set. Warn if it happens.
+ */
+ if (regulator_desc->of_match)
+ dev_warn(dev, "Using provided init data - OF match ignored\n");
- /*
- * We need to keep track of any GPIO descriptor coming from the
- * device tree until we have handled it over to the core. If the
- * config that was passed in to this function DOES NOT contain
- * a descriptor, and the config after this call DOES contain
- * a descriptor, we definitely got one from parsing the device
- * tree.
- */
- if (!cfg->ena_gpiod && config->ena_gpiod)
- dangling_of_gpiod = true;
- if (!init_data) {
init_data = config->init_data;
rdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(config->of_node);
+
+ } else {
+ init_data = regulator_of_get_init_data(dev, regulator_desc,
+ config,
+ &rdev->dev.of_node);
+
+ /*
+ * Sometimes not all resources are probed already so we need to
+ * take that into account. This happens most the time if the
+ * ena_gpiod comes from a gpio extender or something else.
+ */
+ if (PTR_ERR(init_data) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
+ ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ goto clean;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We need to keep track of any GPIO descriptor coming from the
+ * device tree until we have handled it over to the core. If the
+ * config that was passed in to this function DOES NOT contain a
+ * descriptor, and the config after this call DOES contain a
+ * descriptor, we definitely got one from parsing the device
+ * tree.
+ */
+ if (!cfg->ena_gpiod && config->ena_gpiod)
+ dangling_of_gpiod = true;
}
ww_mutex_init(&rdev->mutex, ®ulator_ww_class);
--
2.45.2
On dinsdag 8 oktober 2024 18:07:01 Midden-Europese standaardtijd Jerome Brunet wrote:
> On DT platforms, if a regulator init_data is provided in config, it is
> silently ignored in favor of the DT parsing done by the framework, if
> of_match is set.
>
> of_match is an indication that init_data is expected to be set based on DT
> and the parsing should be done by the regulator framework.
>
> If the regulator provider passed init_data it must be because it is useful
> somehow, in such case of_match should be clear.
>
> If the driver expects the framework to initialize this data on its
> own, it should leave init_data clear.
>
> Warn if both init_data and of_match are set, then default to the provided
> init_data.
Hi Jerome,
This commit is breaking USB on qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead for me.
I can't easily provide the full log since USB is breaking with this but in
effect it looks like in drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c in ci_get_platdata()
the call devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vbus"); is always returning
EPROBE_DEFER, so USB never initializes.
This vbus regulator is provided by ti,bq24192 so the bq24190_charger.c
driver. While the driver does seem to probe correctly, I do also see that
warning "Using provided init data - OF match ignored" in dmesg.
Reverting this patch on top of v6.13.2 fixes the issue and makes USB work
again.
Regards
Luca
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index d0b3879f2746..a58a9db3d9c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -5681,32 +5681,43 @@ regulator_register(struct device *dev,
> goto clean;
> }
>
> - init_data = regulator_of_get_init_data(dev, regulator_desc, config,
> - &rdev->dev.of_node);
> -
> - /*
> - * Sometimes not all resources are probed already so we need to take
> - * that into account. This happens most the time if the ena_gpiod comes
> - * from a gpio extender or something else.
> - */
> - if (PTR_ERR(init_data) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> - goto clean;
> - }
> + if (config->init_data) {
> + /*
> + * Providing of_match means the framework is expected to parse
> + * DT to get the init_data. This would conflict with provided
> + * init_data, if set. Warn if it happens.
> + */
> + if (regulator_desc->of_match)
> + dev_warn(dev, "Using provided init data - OF match ignored\n");
>
> - /*
> - * We need to keep track of any GPIO descriptor coming from the
> - * device tree until we have handled it over to the core. If the
> - * config that was passed in to this function DOES NOT contain
> - * a descriptor, and the config after this call DOES contain
> - * a descriptor, we definitely got one from parsing the device
> - * tree.
> - */
> - if (!cfg->ena_gpiod && config->ena_gpiod)
> - dangling_of_gpiod = true;
> - if (!init_data) {
> init_data = config->init_data;
> rdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(config->of_node);
> +
> + } else {
> + init_data = regulator_of_get_init_data(dev, regulator_desc,
> + config,
> + &rdev->dev.of_node);
> +
> + /*
> + * Sometimes not all resources are probed already so we need to
> + * take that into account. This happens most the time if the
> + * ena_gpiod comes from a gpio extender or something else.
> + */
> + if (PTR_ERR(init_data) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + goto clean;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We need to keep track of any GPIO descriptor coming from the
> + * device tree until we have handled it over to the core. If the
> + * config that was passed in to this function DOES NOT contain a
> + * descriptor, and the config after this call DOES contain a
> + * descriptor, we definitely got one from parsing the device
> + * tree.
> + */
> + if (!cfg->ena_gpiod && config->ena_gpiod)
> + dangling_of_gpiod = true;
> }
>
> ww_mutex_init(&rdev->mutex, ®ulator_ww_class);
>
>
On Sun 09 Feb 2025 at 15:16, Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu> wrote:
> On dinsdag 8 oktober 2024 18:07:01 Midden-Europese standaardtijd Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> On DT platforms, if a regulator init_data is provided in config, it is
>> silently ignored in favor of the DT parsing done by the framework, if
>> of_match is set.
>>
>> of_match is an indication that init_data is expected to be set based on DT
>> and the parsing should be done by the regulator framework.
>>
>> If the regulator provider passed init_data it must be because it is useful
>> somehow, in such case of_match should be clear.
>>
>> If the driver expects the framework to initialize this data on its
>> own, it should leave init_data clear.
>>
>> Warn if both init_data and of_match are set, then default to the provided
>> init_data.
>
> Hi Jerome,
>
> This commit is breaking USB on qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead for me.
>
> I can't easily provide the full log since USB is breaking with this but in
> effect it looks like in drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c in ci_get_platdata()
> the call devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vbus"); is always returning
> EPROBE_DEFER, so USB never initializes.
Sorry about that.
>
> This vbus regulator is provided by ti,bq24192 so the bq24190_charger.c
> driver. While the driver does seem to probe correctly, I do also see that
> warning "Using provided init data - OF match ignored" in dmesg.
Well the driver does this funny thing of passing init_data but also
setting the of_match.
Looking at it more, your driver provide init_data/constraint here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c?h=v6.12.13#n718
Apparently this constraint is only meant as a backup/default in case
nothing is matched by the platform, which would explain why your
platform through the trouble of passing an empty regulator node to
override it.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts#n116
I did not really expect that but it seems intended indeed.
Revert is probably the sane thing to do but it would be nice to have
comment about that and maybe a debug print.
Mark, do you want to revert this directly or shall I submit the change
for you to apply ?
>
> Reverting this patch on top of v6.13.2 fixes the issue and makes USB work
> again.
>
> Regards
> Luca
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/regulator/core.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
>> index d0b3879f2746..a58a9db3d9c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
>> @@ -5681,32 +5681,43 @@ regulator_register(struct device *dev,
>> goto clean;
>> }
>>
>> - init_data = regulator_of_get_init_data(dev, regulator_desc, config,
>> - &rdev->dev.of_node);
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * Sometimes not all resources are probed already so we need to take
>> - * that into account. This happens most the time if the ena_gpiod comes
>> - * from a gpio extender or something else.
>> - */
>> - if (PTR_ERR(init_data) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> - ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> - goto clean;
>> - }
>> + if (config->init_data) {
>> + /*
>> + * Providing of_match means the framework is expected to parse
>> + * DT to get the init_data. This would conflict with provided
>> + * init_data, if set. Warn if it happens.
>> + */
>> + if (regulator_desc->of_match)
>> + dev_warn(dev, "Using provided init data - OF match ignored\n");
>>
>> - /*
>> - * We need to keep track of any GPIO descriptor coming from the
>> - * device tree until we have handled it over to the core. If the
>> - * config that was passed in to this function DOES NOT contain
>> - * a descriptor, and the config after this call DOES contain
>> - * a descriptor, we definitely got one from parsing the device
>> - * tree.
>> - */
>> - if (!cfg->ena_gpiod && config->ena_gpiod)
>> - dangling_of_gpiod = true;
>> - if (!init_data) {
>> init_data = config->init_data;
>> rdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(config->of_node);
>> +
>> + } else {
>> + init_data = regulator_of_get_init_data(dev, regulator_desc,
>> + config,
>> + &rdev->dev.of_node);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Sometimes not all resources are probed already so we need to
>> + * take that into account. This happens most the time if the
>> + * ena_gpiod comes from a gpio extender or something else.
>> + */
>> + if (PTR_ERR(init_data) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + goto clean;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We need to keep track of any GPIO descriptor coming from the
>> + * device tree until we have handled it over to the core. If the
>> + * config that was passed in to this function DOES NOT contain a
>> + * descriptor, and the config after this call DOES contain a
>> + * descriptor, we definitely got one from parsing the device
>> + * tree.
>> + */
>> + if (!cfg->ena_gpiod && config->ena_gpiod)
>> + dangling_of_gpiod = true;
>> }
>>
>> ww_mutex_init(&rdev->mutex, ®ulator_ww_class);
>>
>>
--
Jerome
On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 08:05:05PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote: > Mark, do you want to revert this directly or shall I submit the change > for you to apply ? Could someone please send a patch describing the change.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.